I was under the impression that Google had bought WAZE and had incorporated it into Google Maps. But today, I read about enhancements to the WAZE app. I guess I'm confused who is who now. Any insight? http://www.engadget.com/2015/10/19/waze-app-update-ios-android/
I never downloaded WAZE. but I think I have received WAZE warning when I am navigating with Google Maps about congestion ahead.
Waze is still a standalone app. It's really more for commuting than an overall map service like Google Maps. Since it expands the driving experience by having "Wazers" who update current conditions, it offers more than what Google could do with Maps without them bogging it down. Waze is really good in urban areas like Los Angeles because of our notorious traffic. Waze lets drivers know of alternate routes which GMaps doesn't. The only integration of Waze in to GMaps is icons that appear mentioning a current highway issue from Waze.
Okaaaay, so what is this? http://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2013/06/11/four-reasons-for-google-to-buy-waze/ http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/11/it...a-boost-to-its-location-and-mapping-business/
I prefer Waze. It always routes me the quickest way despite traffic. Plus, it always reads correct road names. Google Maps has a habit of saying "Turn Right on State Route 856", instead of "Turn Right on Sterling Boulevard".
Google wanting to keep other major competitors from acquiring Waze, along with augmenting their existing map service. Kind of like covering two different ends of the mapping spectrum.
I like Waze. It once told me there was road kill in the road up ahead. Very useful in the rural areas of upstate New York. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I must be dense. ("I am your density" - Back To The Future) I still haven't had explained to me why, Waze is still considered a stand-alone app seeing as it is owned by Google and incorporated into Google Maps.
Simple. It's works alone without signing into google or even using google maps ( which I don't). Makes sense? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok. I would have expected Google to take down the brand, its servers, etc. Seems odd both are still active, but I can live with that.
Waze is a driving app. It is road/traffic conditions, notifications of accidents and police presence, along with alternate routing to avoid traffic delays. User reporting ability GMaps does not have. GMaps is exactly that. Maps to view, search businesses, integration with PC web-browser GMaps. It has a satellite view option Waze doesn't. There's transit info and options for travel (by bicycle or foot), plus regular GPS driving directions like Waze. Waze existed long before Google bought it. Wazers, as users are called, are a huge part of what makes the app work so well. Google would anger a highly loyal bunch of users if they got rid of the app or fully merged it with GMaps. Merging the two would make GMaps to heavy. So it makes sense for Google to keep them separate and benefit from the best of both worlds.
@M in LA: I'm aware of all the points you covered. Actually, Google Maps does have accident indications and more (at least the in the Northern CA area I live).
I tried Waze a few weeks ago, but it drove me crazy; I think because I used it for the wrong purpose. I used it to find a place I never went before in an area I was not familiar with. It kept telling me to turn onto side streets and not knowing the streets myself, I just got more confused. Seems like Waze is best for places that you travel to regularly and need help tweaking the route to avoid slowdowns, obstacles and speed traps.
For work I have been regularly driving into downtown DC. Waze is great. Calculates the route based on real time traffic information. Often times it will take me a few miles "out of the way", but when I'm avoiding a huge traffic jam on I-66, I actually get there faster. When I let it do its own thing, I rarely get stuck in traffic.
Ok, so now for a Google Maps plug: After picking my wife up at the Oakland Airport from a red eye flight, I discovered I-880 south was completely stopped due to construction. Turns out even the south-bound entrance was blocked. Even though it was now 12:30AM, traffic around me would not allow me to move over so I ended up on 880 north. I immediately exited at Hegenberger, pulled over into a hotel parking lot and opened Google maps. It knew that 880 was stopped and routed me exactly as I expected -- east to San Leandro Blvd south bound (bad area but no traffic) and then further east to 580 southbound in southeast Oakland/San Leandro. I hadn't driven that route in years but I knew enough that it was correctly routing me. When I got onto 580 I closed Google Maps. (Yes, in Oakland area 580 runs north/south, then around Castro Valley it veers left and becomes a east/west freeway.) We got home around 1AM but it would have been much later if i had attempted to get back on 880 south.