Alright, this has been nagging at me for a couple of days now, so I figured I'd just post something and see if anyone could shed some light on this for me. I was watching TV, and saw a commercial for the LG Chocolate. (I believe it was the "Lady Sovereign" spot.) While we know that the Chocolate is a somewhat flawed product, I couldn't help but be impressed by the slick advertising campaign surrounding it. Then I started to consider the spots for the Moto V3m - in particular, the 'moron in a hardware store' spot, and the 'douchebag on the treadmill' spot. VZW was pushing a lot of the same features on the V3m that they're pushing on the Chocolate - music and navigation - but the V3m (billed as the 'ultimate media RAZR' - I guess VZW didn't get the memo from Moto about some of those new RAZRs) promos seemed positively amateurish compared to the campaign for the Chocolate. Does anyone know the reason for the differences? Different ad agencies? Was the Choco spot paid for or produced by LG, while the V3m spots were VZW-produced? Does VZW know they've got a dud on their hands, and they're putting as much shine on the proverbial turd as they can?
Its an LG. Isn't there any better reason to try and put the biggest spin on it as possible? People generally know that Motorola has quality products, but the LG advertising for their higher end offerings has always been slick. I guess they're just trying to boost their image. -jay
LG is probably spending alot more money than Moto on marketing. They have been suffering from poor sales and Verizon picking up popular Motorola handsets isn't helping them. I guess you would have to see the agreements, but I'll bet the manufacturers are responsible for a very large percentage of marketing costs for thier handsets.
I would tend to agree, although I'm sure when it comes to media spots I think it's probably half half since verizon is pushing it's service too. Thing is anybody else see how much more advertising VZW is doing compared to Cingular/Sprint/etc
from RCR: CIBC: Sales of LG’s Chocolate ‘somewhat disappointing’ By Phil Carson Sep 5, 2006 NEW YORK—In a note to investors this week, CIBC World Markets analyst Ittai Kidron wrote that LG Electronics Co. Ltd.’s Chocolate phone has “challenged” the dominance of Motorola Inc.’s Razr, though actual sales of LG’s much-touted handset have been “somewhat disappointing.” Ultimately, according to Kidron, Motorola will meet its own sales targets for the United States market for the quarter. Kidron wrote that Verizon Wireless has aggressively marketed the Chocolate while putting less marketing muscle behind the Razr, which has been on the market for about two years. The analyst wrote that shipments from LG to Verizon Wireless have been “on pace” at 400,000 to 500,000 units per month beginning in mid-August, although the actual retail sales of the Chocolate were below expectations.