Makes sense. I'm sure the idea has been raised before, it's just usually the mess of organizing these kind of things. Currently cellular network operators install measurement devices (like TEMS Automatic) on taxis and busses to get measurement reports of their network automatically and in real-time. Using the USPS would cover much, much more area. But again, much, much more coordination and red-tape to cut thru before anything actually happens. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/18/opinion/18ravnitzky.html?_r=2
Whew. Maybe I don't need to start hawking my stash of Forever stamps just yet. Thanks RR - interesting, and makes a lot of sense. I didn't realize buses and taxis were already utilized in this way, or that the National Weather Service is using this method to collect data too.
It makes sense I suppose. No other "fleet" with any company could possibly cover that much ground.... So to make the trucks serve more than one purpose is a good idea. However, what about the USPS delivery vehicles that are not the typical branded vehicle owned by USPS? Where I live, they deliver the mail in "normal" vehicles (which I don't think are owned by the USPS, but by the person delivering the mail). I don't think those would be equipped with such communication and measuring devices -- so rural America once again would get a slap in the face.
I don't know that there would be any reason why non-official USPS vehicles couldn't be similarly equipped? I don't live in a rural area, but our Saturday delivery even in my area is by a "temporary" carrier who delivers in their own vehicle. However, most of them use permanently modified vehicles for right-side mail delivery (driver's side on the right). And generally when a temporary carrier is promoted to full time status and receives an "official" USPS vehicle, they sell their vehicle to another temporary carrier. So since even a non USPS-owned vehicle will tend to remain within the system, I would think it would be a worthwhile investment to equip and utilize them in the same manner in the rural areas.
Good idea. UPS could also do this. Their trucks have been equipped with wireless and GPS technologies for at least 10 years.
Actually, UPS has been doing it for a while, though only a very small number of vehicles are equipped. I want to say the vendor we are using also has gear in a number of trucks owned by one of the large big-rig fleets like Swift or JB Hunt.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148a Safari/6533.18.5) Not to mention the thousands of vehicles used by Verizon and AT&T technicians and maintenance people. You would think they would be using them too. Police and fire vehicles? The bottom line will come down to money though. Who's gonna pay for all the equipment, installation and maintenance of the equipment?