I had an interesting experience in a T-Mobile store in Boston today. I went in fully prepared to pay $179 and commit to a data plan that would cost me an extra $20/mo for two years in exchange for a T-Mobile/HTC G1. I happen to know that this particular store has about 30 in stock, unlike the website, where they are back-ordered. I wanted instant gratification, and I told the (knowledgeable) sales guy as much. He started to process the upgrade. Funny thing was, as the sales guy and I were chatting, the subject of unlocking came up (can't remember how). He said, "Well, you know, this is one of the only phones that T-Mobile will not unlock." Still looking for reasons to buy it, and knowing that its 3G is not compatible with AT&T, I said, "Well, it doesn't make sense to bring it to another carrier anyway, so that's OK, unless of course I'm in Europe." He said, "They don't unlock this phone. So if you want to use a foreign SIM card in Europe, I would not recommend it." I said, "You mean if I have this for 3 or 4 months and tell T-Mobile I will be traveling in Europe they won't unlock it?" He said, "That's right. What you could do is sign up for the Google Developer Program, which anyone can do for $25, and then you can buy the unlocked, unbranded version from Google. It's $400, which is the same price we sell it for without a contract." Then he told me a few other cool things about the special Google version. I thought this was extraordinary. He actually talked himself out of a sale! When I walked out of there, he had to know there was only a slim chance I would ever be back. So what I want to know is: Given that T-Mobile is a European company, is there a real downside to not being able to slip in a random European SIM? If I only go to Europe once a year at most, what are the chances I will spend more than the $220 difference (now) in phone charges (later) by sticking to T-Mobile's offerings? Does anyone know what the international roaming charges are (voice and data) on a G1? (I can ask T-Mo this, of course). Thanks, SW
Wow, sounds like good customer service, even at the expense of a sale. It sounds like T-Mobile is "iPhone"-ing the G1 to keep as many people from taking it to AT&T (or other GSM carriers, for that matter) as possible. I understand why, but still IMO, it is a bit heavy-handed. Apparently it's a "carrier-eat-carrier" world out there...And the G1 is the latest hostage.
Very interesting Steve, I would be all for the unlocked and unbranded version and $400 is actually less expensive than what most Smartphones go for. As for your concerns: 1. You will not be able to slip in a random Euro SIM in your T-Mobile USA locked G1. If you want to use a local SIM you can always use your unlocked LG and leave the G1 for data including E-Mail. That is what I do, I do not use my primary phone for making calls while overseas just receiving calls from here and data. AT&T's lowest International Data Roaming Package is $25.00 for 20 meg. which is just pefect for me. 2.There will always be a financial benefit in getting a phone through the provider. In the case of the G1 I don't doubt somebody will come up with the unlocking tools soon, however the provider mandated bloatware will always remain on it until you are able to get an "untainted" ROM for it and want to hack your phone. just in case it is not obvious to you, I am highly allergic to branded devices.
Somehow, I knew you would say that. Of course, I still have the unlocked LG, so I agree that voice is not really a problem. It's really Web browsing and Google maps I am concerned about. I need maps and restaurant reviews! I looked up T-Mobile's rates for France, Italy and Germany, just to get a sampling. They were all the same, as follows: That's a lot more than $25 for 20 meg, obviously, and it could run into real money. Looks like I may need to get the Google version. SW
Well the plot thickens a bit. I called T-Mobile Customer Service today and they told me that T-Mobile will unlock the G1. The rep further said that since I've been a customer in good standing since 2006, they would unlock it for me right away, without a waiting period. I'll believe that when it happens, but it was nice to hear. Also, it seems somewhat consistent with this Engadget article: T-Mobile's CTO on G1 unlocking and tethering -- plus a few details you might have missed Which contains the following: "(CTO Cole) Brodman also said that the company's policy of unlocking phones for customers in good standing wouldn't change for this phone." SW
Well, you could always try to get it unlocked right away and if that fails exercise your buyers remorse privilege
Steve, AT&T also does unlock right away. What they require is that the person has been a customer in good standing for 90 days not that you have that phone for 90 days. The first calls from my Blackjack & also from my Treo 750(on my way back from the store)was to CS asking for the unlock code. I am pretty sure it is the same with T-Mobile. The other restriction being you cannot ask for an another unlock code sooner than 90 days after the first one. Oh and I would still get the unbranded one Palm850/v0100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11)
As you suggested below, if I get the T-Mo version, I'm definitely going to test this policy during the eval period. I know you would. I'll have more on this later. SW
I work for tmobile and we DO UNLOCK THE G1 so the guy in the store didn't know what he was talking about as a matter of fact I processed two unlocks for the G1 this week. His intent was honorable but information was just plain wrong.
Thanks, I am going to come back to you if I have an issue doing this. One other question - do you know if/when T-Mobile will be sending out the "Cupcake" update for the G1? Thanks, SW
I saw this last night: Facts surface about Cupcake elements in a new T-Mobile G1 update | Android Community
Yes, thanks. I'm less concerned with the date or exactly what's in the update (lots of speculation and hair-splitting in the comments below the article you referenced) than the principle. If T-Mo is willing to periodically send out updates that fix bugs or improve functionality, that's great. That's what I would expect in a phone based on an "open" platform. Beyond that, whether we get stereo bluetooth in a week or 3 months is less important to me. Having a supported version of the phone was one reason I decided to give the T-Mo version a try, over the developer version (or "Android Dev Phone 1"). Apparently this is unlike the situation where Nokia, Palm, or some other manufacturer releases an unlocked, but fully functional device. Google is making no claims for its functionality other than as a developer testbed. Then I read this detailed discussion of updating a Dev Phone with the latest software yourself, and it seemed like more effort than I was willing to commit. Laziness won out and I am trying the stock G1. I'll have some impressions in the next few days. SW
I've had T-Mobile and the G1 for two months. I was traveling over the holidays so I called t-mobile about getting the phone unlocked. They gave me no fuss and submitted the request. They e-mailed me a few days later with the code. So whoever told you that they don't unlock the phone is an idiot.
Yes, I have received my unlock code as well. The store person meant well, but was misinformed. I will report on the unlock in my G1 review thread. SW