Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Study: Cingular brand more popular than AT&T

Discussion in 'AT&T Wireless Forum' started by Shizuka, Jan 18, 2007.

  1. Shizuka

    Shizuka Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PuertoRico
    My Phone:
    Nokia
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Study: Cingular brand more popular than AT&T

    AT&T Inc. could have a tough time transferring the positive associations of the Cingular Wireless L.L.C. brand to the veteran AT&T brand, according to new research from the Keller Fay Group, which specializes in tracking and analyzing word-of-mouth marketing.

    According to Keller Fay’s measurement program for word-of-mouth marketing, Cingular has nearly four times more positive talk about it than AT&T. In the telecom category, Cingular ranked second in what Keller Fay calls “Talkshare,” or the percentage of people talking about the brand. Cingular claimed 19 percent of telecom conversations, and 19 percent of those conversations were positive. AT&T ranked last among telecom providers both in the percentage of people talking about the brand (seven percent) and in positive discussions (five percent). People were also far more likely to recommend that someone buy or try Cingular (27 percent) than AT&T (15 percent).

    “The branding challenges for AT&T will be formidable regardless of its name choice, since telecom has the least positive word of mouth of any product or service category we measure,” said Ed Keller, founder and CEO of the Keller Fay Group.

    A survey released by Keller Fay in June of last year showed that brands including Toyota, Wal-Mart, Honda and Apple/iPod consistently claimed a positive place in people’s conversations; the only telecom company that made the top 10 was Verizon, in 10th place.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. Shizuka

    Shizuka Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PuertoRico
    My Phone:
    Nokia
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    I don't know much about branding and marketing but, Could it be a good idea to keep both brands as a brandname like: Cingular+at&t or At&t-Cingular ?

    What you think?:confused:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12,735
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    50
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    That's like Phillips-Magnavox, or Sony-Ericsson. It could work, but you never know.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Zebrapimp

    Zebrapimp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-mobile
    I think they should be more concerned with streamlining management than worrying about the name change. I think and I just think it but one of the things that hindered their growth for a while was the idea that Sigman had to answer to two different boards of directors.

    That being said, I think the at&t name is a much better "brand" name. Its more recognizable globally. Where the benefit is drawn for a more globally recognizable name I don't know but it sounds good to say.

    I wonder if this poll would be reversed if At&t had been the kept name and Cingular was now the name they were changing too????
     
  5. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    Unfortunatly for Brand names, AT&T got beaten up in the 80's in the US & it hurt them big time.
    Yes Globally they are a bigger name, and another problem is with all their past problems the younger generation doesn't know it as well as the older generation that knows how the name meant something.
    It's going to take Cingular/AT&T a while to get people to look at AT&T as a leader again and a lot of work by the current management that took over AT&T and BellSouth.

    For a while and maybe more then 6 months they may need to keep the rebranding process going, maybe they should have the Alpha tags say AT&T/Cingular on them for 4-6 Months to get people use to the changes in the name only.

    The only problem with Cingular keeping the AT&T Wireless name, was it belonged to the original AT&T as a leased name, and they weren't able to keep it under the merger agreements. Would it have helped, I don't think so & by going as Cingular from AT&T Wireless then to AT&T may actually help them.

    A lot of people had bad experiences with AT&T Wireless and even with the name change you hear people thinking it's going back to the old AT&T Wireless & complaining.

    They have their work cut out for them, but I think if they do it right, they can make it work.
     
  6. Jay2TheRescue

    Jay2TheRescue Resident Spamslayer
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    12,405
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    158
    Likes Received:
    438
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    My Phone:
    Pixel 4a 5G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&Tingular 310-410
    You mean like Sprint Nextel?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. Damian7132

    Damian7132 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    My Phone:
    V3razr
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Cingular Wireless
    THe Cingular Name is Dead (as much as i dont like it).There is no going back the rebranding is going foward and alot faster than alot of you know in next few weeks there are alot of changes that will be effecting "The New AT&T".A Opp asked me my view on how fast the change will be and i told him i actually think as soon as they have enough Blue paint and shirts ordered LOL.
     
  8. Shizuka

    Shizuka Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PuertoRico
    My Phone:
    Nokia
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Exactly. I know the re-branding to at&t mobile or whatever is imminent. But there are plenty of examples of re-branding mergers using both names:

    American-Marietta merges with the Glenn L. Martin Company to form the Martin Marietta Corporation

    Schering Corporation grew to become a global research-based pharmaceutical firm, and in 1971, merged with Plough Inc., a worldwide manufacturer of consumer products, to create Schering-Plough Corporation

    1989 SmithKline Beckman and The Beecham Group plc merge to form SmithKline Beecham plc.

    1995 Glaxo and Wellcome merge to form Glaxo Wellcome.

    2000 GlaxoSmithKline formed through the merger of Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham.

    Lockheed Martin Corporation was formed in March 1995 with the merger of two of the world's premier technology companies, Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta Corporation.

    Although Ben&Jerry's is not a merger I love the fusion of Chocolate Fudge-Brownie :biggrin:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. stockscalper

    stockscalper Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2003
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    WNC
    My Phone:
    Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Unfortunately, T-Horrible
    They should just keep the Cingular name and put in small print "a division of AT&T" but they won't because of corporate arrogance. I agree with the study. AT&T has a negative image to me, not because of the 80's and the breakup but because of how sluggish and behind the times they have always been. Not to mention their failed ventures in the past, Lucent Technologies, AT&T computer division, etc. Then, there are recent memories of AT&T Wireless and its poor customer service and horrible coverge. I remember people saying when the Cingular name came about that it was needed because of the bad image and reputation AT&T Wireless had. How soon we forget, but maybe that is what they are relying on :browani:
     
  10. Fnineone

    Fnineone New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    From my own experience. When it used to be ATT wireless, I had great services and coverage. Then when it became Cingular I thoughts things would get better, but it didn't and it went from good to bad. If I get a dime each time I was lied to by Cingular Reps/customer service, I would be rich.

    It has gotten so bad that recently I switched to T-mobile and have been pretty happy so far.

    TBH, doesn't really matter which name the brand, if their customer service and their management is poor. A good name can become bad over night.
     
  11. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    I am not sure where you live, but am guessing CA by your coverage experience & saying coverage got worst. They appear to still be working on integration in CA from what I hear & it's a large state with a lot of work needed to the old Blue network.

    I know for I also never had a problem with AT&T Wireless, and when they merged I know a lot of Orange customers coverage improved as the integration happened & now they are happy.
    This is in the North NJ area, but others have said coverage has improved when the integration was completed.

    I guess we all will see what happens when the name changes & if it really does effect new customers & Churn over the year.
     
  12. Fnineone

    Fnineone New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope I live in Lexington, Kentucky.

    Background I use a triband phone that does not use 850mhz. So it uses 1900 mhz. And it was working fine up until last April. Called Cingular numerous time but they can never tell me why it stopped working (each time it was something different). The only area that can still get a signal was at the Bluegrass Airport.

    And if you check coverage map from Cingular, they don't tell you which area uses 850/1900

    The company I work for uses Cingular and the devices are quad band, so those have no problems at all with signal, but driving thru I-75 between lexington and Cincinnati, frequently your calls will get dropped or the quality of the call would become so bad that you will have to hang up.
     
  13. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    That was your problem for sure, lack of 850, as well as them still adding towers ect... I am pretty sure they are running both bands in KY. You only need a dual band for the US, since 2 of the bands on a quad are for Europe & other counties overseas.

    It's good that your T-Mobile is working well for you in these area's & that's what's the most important thing.
     
  14. COtech

    COtech Bronze Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    1,043
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    My Phone:
    Sam. Galaxy SII Skyrocket
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility
    Cingular told the GSM Forum, see my earlier http://forums.wirelessadvisor.com/cingular-wireless-users/57781-850-1900-mhz-3g-band-coverage.html thread.

    COtech
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  15. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    I would say that it is worth teh risk to change the naem. If one looks at the JD powers survey, the Cingular brand did not do well on a national basis. So may be the at&t will get that turned around.
     
  16. Jordan2005

    Jordan2005 Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Yuba City / Marysville
    My Phone:
    Black Moto Razr V3
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Cingular, T-Mobile, Verizon, Sprint PCS, Nextel,
    To be honest, i dont think that the Cingular name is in any way shape or form better than AT&T. AT&T is soooo mush better than Cingular imho!!!! Plus the cs that i got from at&t was 1000 times bettr than the cs i get from Cingular. Cingular is horriable!!!! AT&T was the best i ever had!!!

    I compleatly agree!
    If anything, i think AT&T would be WAY better than Cingular!!!!!
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. blsemp

    blsemp Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2003
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Powdersville, South Carolina
    My Phone:
    Nokia 900
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t
    I feel it is the right choice. They want to bundle services. It would only make sense to have the same name.

    :D :D
     
  18. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    You do realize that only the name is changing & it's not going to change their CS, it's still the same Cingular people running the business.

    This is Not the Old AT&T, it's Cingular's owners SBC/BellSouth.
    1st SBC bought AT&T Corp. and kept the AT&T name, then they bought BellSouth & changed that to AT&T. Since SBC/AT&T now own 100% of Cingular, they are changing it's name to AT&T.
     
  19. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch

    One thing I wonder, does any one think that at&t might some how unify their CS group and gun for the best service? I know the days of the old AT&T when they still owned the Wireless they had the best CS ever which started to fall appart slowly after it was spun off from the parent company.
     
  20. Athena

    Athena New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California

    It's possible. It might make things easier if you can just call one number and speak to one representative about all your "at&t" services.. Just like I can now, with my local, long distance, and DSL..

    The thing about AWS even before the spinoff, they were still a separate division of AT&T Long Distance, and had their own customer service, but you're right. Prior to the spinoff AWS customer service was soo much better. Having worked for them in customer service (1998-2004), it was a pain for all of us to have to deal with the stupidity from Management and never ending changing of how we were to deal with customers.. Which was the main reason why I quit my job there, right before the buyout from Cingular, they completely lost their sense of direction, and had us going every which way, struggling to keep as many customers as possible. It was all about the contracts... Get as many people in contracts as you could..
     
  21. UFO

    UFO Bronze Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Hampton Roads, VA
    My Phone:
    Palm Centro
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Sprint and alltel
    This is very unlikely because at&t contracts out a lot of their customer service call centers. I'm assuming they have different 'divisions' so that a number of these 'divisions' can be contracted out to low-bidder third parties that can do the job for less. I know a few people that answer the phones for at&t though I can't remember for which division. They've all sounded really bitter about their job but I won't go into details. It will be hard for at&t to improve the customer service when they're not actually the ones that do their own customer service. It could be different for at&t mobile/wireless though but I doubt a unified cs is in the near future.
     
  22. Grimreaper

    Grimreaper New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    My Phone:
    Nokia 6620
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Cingular/at&t
    You have phone that still has a AT&T logo on it? is it TDMA? If so thats your problem. The IRDB and other roaming programing is locking you out. Also Ohio 1900mhz PCS is GONE. Since they didn't have Analog they didn't need to keep that state online till 2008. They cleared the band width so they could getthe GSM and UMTS imbeded better. So you are roaming off a bunch of little compaines.

    If you have a Cingular logo GSM product and having this complaint I would suspect your issue is the phone not the system.
     
  23. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    I would think may be they would combine and use some part of it. It can not be all of the at&t CS be handled by third party. Cingular has a lot of its owned call centers with some contracts that they picked up from the days of blue and they continue to have them (most are in Canada). I doubt they will but if they move to integrate products they then would need specific departments to handle the all in one and not keep sending one from one department to the other.
     
  24. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon

    I thought Cingular had quite a few Call Centers in the US as well, when they were talking about their union negotiations, I thought they mentioned around 5. I could be wrong though and we know they have a couple in Canada as you mentioned.

    It would make sense for them to consolidate them into the centers & may save them more money in the long run.
     
  25. Athena

    Athena New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    In addition.. A few months after the buyout, all of the AWS owned call centers (not 3rd party vendors..) were transitioned over to Cingular customer service, and all the 3rd party vendors remained the "blue" customer service team.
     
  26. walkguru

    walkguru Wireless Guru
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,084
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    28
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    My Phone:
    iphone 3gs 32black
    Wireless Provider(s):
    cingular,family plan w/4 lines
    att will do just fine, nicholing and dimeing us to death, making money hand over fist.:loony:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  27. Shizuka

    Shizuka Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PuertoRico
    My Phone:
    Nokia
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    As long as Cingular keeps delivering the right numbers I don't see AT&T changing anything.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  28. Shizuka

    Shizuka Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PuertoRico
    My Phone:
    Nokia
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T

    I mean nothing but the brandname.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  29. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    They have to keep the investors & Upper Managment happy with all of their money they keep putting in their pockets.

    Maybe when they have their networks built out, then they can give us a break. (Yeah Right).
     
  30. unit417

    unit417 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bethlehem, PA
    My Phone:
    i730
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Nextel & Cingular
    Lets face it, no matter what it is called, if the system works, and the price is right, people will by it. I know people who still had their service with AT&T and never paid the price to switch to Cingular just to get rollover. I only went back after several years with Verizon to get the additional lines for $9.95. Then Verizon came out with it. I still remember the old days of 1986 when I had this HUGE EFJohnson phone hanging off my dash and two antennas on the roof of my truck and sometimes the $600 phone bills for the month. Then it was Cellular One. Verizon was BAMS. And everybody's phone worked on everybody's network. And I still have my custom number from 1986! And I still carry my 2 way radio. Guess I am from the stone ages. Got that in 78. And remember when the pager was king? I even have one that has the Cell One logo. Enough history.....
     
    #30 unit417, Jan 30, 2007
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2007

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice