Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Sprint's "Simply Everything" plans appear to gain edge over AT&T

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by larry, Jul 29, 2008.

  1. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Sprint's "Simply Everything" plans appear to gain edge over AT&T

    If the aim is to win the hearts, minds -- and most importantly business -- of consumers, obviously it's a big help to win over the front line troops.

    In this, Sprint Nextel seems to be making important progress, according to a new report issued today by an analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co.

    Considering the barbs tossed Sprint's way last week by its friends at Radio Shack, it is noted with a wee bit of irony that the electronics retailer is the source of this morning's positive news.

    Radio Shack sells both Sprint and AT&T wireless service. The Baird team makes a point of regularly checking in with the clerks at the Shack to get an indication of the latest trends affecting the No. 1 -- AT&T -- and No. 3 -- Sprint -- wireless companies.

    Maybe Sprint CEO Dan Hesse is on to something after all with all this "Now Network" and "Simply Everything" unlimited calling stuff.

    Sprint is managing to stand out with its $99 plan, which includes unlimited voice calls, Internet surfing and other data services. AT&T has a $99 unlimited voice minutes plan.

    "Reps previously viewed the difference between the two carriers primarily as a choice between rollover minutes and earlier nights and weekends; however, with Sprint's Simply Everything plan, Sprint appears to have become the cost leader at the high end at RadioShack stores," Baird's William Power wrote. "Generally, reps seem to perceive Sprint as having the better data network and AT&T as having broader coverage. Overall, 54% of reps who recommended one carrier over the other recommended Sprint, largely because of the
    perceived greater data value."

    Sprint's "Simply Everything" plans appear to gain edge over AT&T | Sprint Connection | News and views on Sprint Nextel
     
  2. M in LA

    M in LA Mobile 28 Years Plus
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    347
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Phone:
    iPhone 13 Pro Max, XS Max
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon (since 1994)
    I wonder if this news will bear out in Sprint's quarterly numbers?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    The general consensus is that they can't do any worse than the past 2 or 3 quarters. It can only get better from here.
     
  4. M in LA

    M in LA Mobile 28 Years Plus
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    347
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Phone:
    iPhone 13 Pro Max, XS Max
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon (since 1994)
    For Sprint's sake, I hope you're right.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12,735
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    50
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    LOL! That better be true. I really wish the 3rd Q comes out with no net loss in subs for Sprint. At least a modest gain.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. Ddeere2

    Ddeere2 Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Laredo, Texas
    My Phone:
    iPhone 3GS 16Gb
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Yeah, but I'm not to sure, with a lot of people complaining about how were in a recession.But on the other hand it might, because finally consumer confidence is picking up, so Sprint might have lower numbers of loss than before.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12,735
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    50
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Sprint numbers in this coming report, whatever they may be, will really underline the failure of the Nextel merger. One of the main reasons for them to merge with Nextel was to be not so far behind Verizon and AT&T, but if you look at the totals, they're just as far behind as they were before they bought Nextel, some 20+ million customers. Once again, a distant third. And after Verizon finishes up its merger with Alltel, the difference will be even more pronounced.

    Makes me wonder, if they hadn't bought Nextel, maybe they would've had the same number of customers as they do today, but that growth would've been real growth, not purchased growth, plus they wouldn't have wasted all those billions on Nextel.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Regardless of what people think about the Nextel merger I'm still very glad it happened. It has been a huge benefit to us CDMA customers who got MUCH better coverage and call reliability out of the merger. Coverage that we would have never had for the most part otherwise. Unfortunately most customers don't realize this and have just taken it for granted.
     
  9. Simon5282

    Simon5282 Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2002
    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Florida
    My Phone:
    iPhone
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    For the industries sake, I hope you are right.
     
  10. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12,735
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    50
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Why you say "never", Larry? Networks are under constant improvement so I can't see any operator stopping coverage expansion of their network anywhere. Why was it necessary to buy Nextel to expand coverage? Couldn't Sprint do the same on their own? They were pretty good fighting NIMBYs in California, aren't they?

    Granted those improvements you speak about happened sooner as a result of the Nextel merger, but I wouldn't say they would've never happened absent the merger. I believe if they would've funneled those $35 billion in network improvements rather than the Nextel merger you would probably have an even better network today. Just think about it.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    I've talked about the reasons for this plenty of times before and don't really feel like re-hashing all of it again. In theory yes they could have used the Nextel money to make large scale improvements but it just wouldn't have happened for a variety of reasons. Without the Nextel purchase they would have only kept up their normal pace of improvements which would have been much smaller on scale and taken longer to do.
     

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice