Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Sprint sued by another affiliate, shareholders approve deal

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by ComicalMoodyDan, Jul 13, 2005.

  1. ComicalMoodyDan

    ComicalMoodyDan Gold Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2001
    Messages:
    6,302
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Kingsport, TN
    My Phone:
    LG Volt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Sprint
    Sprint sued by another affiliate, shareholders approve deal
    By Dan Meyer
    Jul 13, 2005

    Sprint Corp.'s pending acquisition of Nextel Communications Inc. received mixed news Wednesday as a Sprint wireless affiliate filed a lawsuit attempting to prevent Sprint from competing against the affiliate in its markets following the planned acquisition. On the positive side, the deal gained support from both Sprint and Nextel shareholders.

    Sprint affiliate Ubiquitel Inc. claimed that Sprint's pending acquisition of Nextel will violate its affiliate agreement as the combined operations plan to use Nextel's existing infrastructure, licenses and network to augment Sprint's network in the area.

    "Thus, the seamless national network that Ubiquitel and Sprint's other affiliates have financed, designed, constructed, managed and operated in their respective service areas will be expanded to draw on additional resources managed and operated by persons and entities other than the affiliates," Ubiquitel noted in its claim. "Accordingly, after the merger closes, Ubiquitel will be competing in its exclusive service areas with Sprint Nextel to sign up new customers for exactly the same seamless nationwide Sprint Nextel network, in violation of the management agreement."

    Ubiquitel also said that the Sprint/Nextel operations plan to begin selling newly branded Sprint services in former Nextel retail outlets that will be rebranded as Sprint Nextel stores. In support of its claim, Ubiquitel said that during a conference call with its affiliates late last month, Sprint said its goal was for both Sprint and Nextel to sell both companies' products and services on "day one" after the acquisition is complete.

    Ubiquitel added that Nextel's ongoing spectrum relocation process with the Federal Communications Commission will further violate its affiliate agreement. The FCC plan will provide Nextel with 10 megahertz of spectrum in the 1.9 GHz spectrum band in exchange for some of Nextel's 800 MHz spectrum holdings and nearly $5 billion in cash and related expenses. Ubiquitel said its affiliate agreement prevents Sprint from offering a competing service using the 1.9 GHz spectrum bands in Ubiquitel's service areas.

    Ubiquitel said it is licensed by Sprint to provide services in portions of California, Nevada, Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Indiana, Kentucky and Tennessee, and it currently serves more than 413,000 Sprint wireless customers.

    The Ubiquitel complaint also alleges "tortuous interference" by Nextel in improperly interfering with the affiliate's exclusive rights under the affiliate agreement. Ubiquitel claims that Nextel was aware that its acquisition by Sprint would violate the affiliate agreement with Sprint, but Nextel "intentionally caused Sprint to execute the merger agreement-a significant factor giving rise to the imminent breach of the management agreement."

    Sprint noted in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that both Sprint and Nextel plan to "vigorously defend this matter."

    Ubiquitel said it was seeking a court judgement to force Sprint to comply with the exclusivity provisions of its affiliate agreement and prevent Sprint from disclosing confidential Ubiquitel business information to any person involved in operating or managing Nextel's business operations in Ubiquitel's markets; using Nextel's infrastructure, licenses or network to provide Sprint coverage or sell Sprint products and services in Ubiquitel's service areas; using the Sprint brand to sell wireless services in Ubiquitel's service areas; and from owning, operating, building or managing a wireless network using Nextel's 1.9 GHz spectrum in Ubiquitel's service areas.

    Sprint said in its SEC 8-K filing that it had discussed possible revisions of Ubiquitel's affiliate agreement ahead of its acquisition of Nextel, and it expected those discussions to continue.

    The Ubiquitel suit is similar to one filed by fellow affiliate US Unwired Inc. that attempted to prevent Sprint/Nextel from offering competing wireless services in US Unwired's Southeast footprint. That suit, which went to trial last month, was settled earlier this week when Sprint agreed to acquire US Unwired for $1.3 billion.

    Nextel has a similar dilemma with its affiliate Nextel Partners Inc., which began legal proceedings last week in New York seeking a stay in the Sprint acquisition of Nextel, pending amendments to its affiliate agreement. Nextel Partners' claims are centered around a recent Sprint branding announcement to use the Sprint name for the combined Sprint/Nextel operations and Nextel Partners' possible use of the name for its own operations.

    The Nextel Partners' issues are not expected to impede Sprint's acquisition of Nextel as Nextel Partners management has already said it will encourage its shareholders to vote in favor of a put option that will force Nextel to acquire the 68 percent of Nextel Partners it does not already own.

    Despite the affiliate issues, Sprint and Nextel shareholders overwhelmingly both voted earlier today in favor of Sprint's acquisition of Nextel. Reportedly more than 70 percent of Nextel shareholders and 96 percent of Sprint shareholders voted to approve the deal, which is still waiting approval from the Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice. FCC staff members have reportedly recommended approval of the deal, which is expected to close next month.

    Sprint sued by another affiliate, shareholders approve deal
     
  2. agentHibby

    agentHibby Iowa Cellular Guru
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SID 150 or 1214
    My Phone:
    Nokia 6256i
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon Wireless
    looks like Sprint will have to buy another affilate so they will shut up and let them have there way.

    Before too long Sprint will have to buy back almost all of there partners! :loony: :googlyeye :evillaugh
     
  3. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Ubiquitel is one of the better affiliates. Sprint should just buy them out.
     
  4. Fathead

    Fathead In the Industry
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Pocatello, ID
    Ubiquitel resembles swiss cheese here. Please buy them sprint.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    They're California network is quite good.
     
  6. Fathead

    Fathead In the Industry
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Pocatello, ID
    If sprint buys them and puts just a little effort in it, they could have a quality network here.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12,735
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    50
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    So it sounds like Ubiquitel's coverage is not quite ubiquitous. ;)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Alamosa PCS is another large affiliate who might file a lawsuit.
     
  9. agentHibby

    agentHibby Iowa Cellular Guru
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SID 150 or 1214
    My Phone:
    Nokia 6256i
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon Wireless
    can't wait for another iPCS lawsuit :lol:

    I am sure Horizon will add to the pot as well.

    Ubiquitel's network in Logan is fine, but once you get into ID it not so great like fathead has said.
     
  10. NYCDru

    NYCDru Sprint Newbie
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2002
    Messages:
    3,239
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    Motrola V3m
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Sprint, Verizon(former), ATT(former),
    And quite frankly, they will be happier once they do.
     
  11. WirelessBeachBum

    WirelessBeachBum Soylent Green is People
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2002
    Messages:
    2,792
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    Hilton Head Island, SC
    My Phone:
    Thunderbolt...still
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW
    Yep I'm waiting for Alamosa to join in, they merged with Airgate the affiliate in my area....
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
    Agreed, Sprint's network in Idaho is like swiss cheese.
     

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice