Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Sprint/Nextel Cell tower Malibu

Discussion in 'GENERAL Wireless Discussion' started by RRainey, Jan 25, 2007.

  1. RRainey

    RRainey New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Culver City
    I joined this forum in order to post this question. I was just passing some time yesterday and I Googled my parents names. Included in the results was a Conditional Use permit application before the planning commision for the city Of malibu for a Wireless Telecommunications Facility. Apparently it was approved. Some changes were make on a power pole which is either on or very near my parents property. this use permit was issued in 2001!

    My parents were approached and were offered up to 700/month for this "cell tower". They never recieved a dime, and never signed a contract. How can I tell if the power pole has a cell on it? And do they owe my parents lots of bucks? RR
     
  2. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    can you post a picture so soem can take alook at what is attched on the pole and then I am sure some one will be able to tell you.
     
  3. RRainey

    RRainey New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Culver City
    I will take a Photo next time I am out there, thanks RR
     
  4. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    If Sprint decided to use a power pole to place their antenna then they would be paying the power company a monthly lease rate. I believe I remember the case you are referring to in Malibu. If you give me an address or cross streets there I'll look it up.
     
  5. RRainey

    RRainey New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Culver City
    I just find it odd that they were offered money if the power company was going to be paid. The first offer was 300/month and my mom kept saying no and maybe she got too gready, the final offer which she refused was 700/month. She was kind of concerned about "radiation".

    Her address is 3821 Carbon Canyon road RR
     
  6. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Sprint does not have an antenna there. Their nearest one is at 22002 Carbon Mesa which is to the North West of there. They probably changed their minds about needing a site in that location or they dropped it from their budget.

    By the way there's much more radiation that comes from the phone itself then there is from the cell site antennas. $700/month would have been a great deal for this type of site. I would have snatched it right up. I'm also wondering why they were offered money. Typically Malibu doesn't allow cell sites on private residential property.
     
  7. RRainey

    RRainey New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Culver City
    I suppose that is why they went to the planning commission and got approval for a "residential wireless telecommunications facility" within a RR-2 zone.
    I suppose another reason my parents didn't go for it was they really didn't need the money. Someone else went for the 700 or less. RR
     
  8. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Well in some cases they do allow it. But it's not very typical. In any event they changed their plans and went for something else. It happens all the time in the business.
     
  9. TelcomJunkie

    TelcomJunkie Bad Handoff Investigator
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,355
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    151
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    The 4145
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Big Brother
    I'll let you know tomorrow afternoon.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. RRainey

    RRainey New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Culver City
    T. Junkie, did you have a chance to "check it out" ? RR
     
  11. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Just out of curiosity why does this matter now? Are you hoping Sprint will re-consider their offer and once again want to use this location for a future cell antenna? Or do you think they snuck up an antenna and aren't paying?
     
    #11 larry, Jan 26, 2007
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2007
  12. TelcomJunkie

    TelcomJunkie Bad Handoff Investigator
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,355
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    151
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    The 4145
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Big Brother
    Sorry I didn't make it quite that far up PCH today. But I'll will be on Monday.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. RRainey

    RRainey New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Culver City
    I think they may have put the antenna in and should be paying! RR
     
  14. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
  15. TelcomJunkie

    TelcomJunkie Bad Handoff Investigator
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,355
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    151
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    The 4145
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Big Brother
    Sorry in the delay but I did not see any Sprint equipment at that address. There is a Sprint fiber run in the area but you would not see any money off the pole lease, even if it's on your property since the pole is owned by Southern California Edison.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice