Teens Rate Music, Games and Video Functionality Less Important on Cell Phones Online wireless retailer LetsTalk has published the results of a survey of US teenagers on their use of cell phones. The respondents, aged 10-18, overwhelmingly chose text messaging as their most important feature beyond voice calls, with very few teens identifying functionality such as video, email, instant messaging (IM) or a music player as the most important feature on a cell phone. The survey asked a representative sampling of teens in the United States between ages 10 and 18, what is your cell phone's most important feature, and found: 66% of females aged 16-18 consider texting the most important feature; compared to just 49% of males in same age group 35% of males aged 10-12 consider games the most important feature; nearly three times the average teen Despite efforts by carriers, mobile video is not considered the most important feature for any teen segment Camera phones are the 2nd most popular feature behind text messaging. On average, 27% of teen females thought camera phones were the most important feature; 25% of males. The aggregate responses for teens in terms of their most important cell phone feature: Texting -- 49% Camera -- 25% Games -- 12% Music player -- 5% IM -- 5% E-mail -- 2% Video -- 2% "Are cell phones changing and doing more than ever before? Absolutely. Do teens look at their phones today and see much more than a cell phone or texting device? No." said Delly Tamer, founder and CEO of _____________. "Past research from _____________ has shown that many consumers don't rely on their cell phones for everything, and teens today seem to be telling us the same thing." The texting survey, commissioned by LetsTalk and conducted by noted research firm Teenage Research Unlimited, was conducted in August 2006. The poll interviewed a representative sampling of over 1,200 young adults in the United States between the ages of 10 and 18. www.cellular-news.com/story/19339.php
Interesting survey. I know the carriers really want to entice the youngsters with features, but even they care much more about voice and text. I think they should be spending money on building rock solid coverage prior to committing resources to things like video. The cart is before the horse at times.
The trouble with that is that coverage is not very "sexy." People whine about companies paying Catherine Zeta Jones instead of putting up more towers. It just don't work that way despite some people thinking that it should.
I think the problem with this, is a few things. 1st Verizon & Cingular with the larger networks would be a leaders in these fields & the other carriers wouldn't want that while they build out their networks to provide better coverage. 2nd the carriers want to show the investors they are making them money & not just spending it, so if they can get more money for data even though it's not rock solid coverage for voice or data, the investors don't care, plus offering it now gives them more money to build more towers. And 3rd, these companies that develop these technologies, are excellent sales people & make the carriers buy these products, before other carriers. It would be nice to have rock solid coverage almost everywhere in the country, but that won't happen until the carriers get all the money they can out of the customers.