I was wondering about smart watches, like the Samsung Gear, others, and the anticipated Apple iWatch. I'm going to guess that the dozen regulars on this forum probably feel the way I am at the moment...I don't really need one, or see the point. What is your opinions? Here are some of my observations. I was in a train station where Samsung had purchased ALL the ad space. Surrounded with posters of S4 phones, Note3 and the Gear Smartwatch, I gave it some thought. The ads showed the Gear being used to answer the phone, read a notification, read about 6 words from an email, and a couple of other things. I wear a watch, but do I really need another rechargeable device on my wrist to tell me a snapshot of what is on the phone in my pants pocket? Not really. Besides, I'm a klutz with watches. I bang them going through doors all the time. Besides not liking having the same watch as everyone else potentially, scratching up an iWatch would be be worse. I mean, I have a case for my phone, and that is in my pocket...but the watch is really 'out there' ready to be banged up all the time. Did I mention recharging it? So then I tried to think like Steve Jobs...okay Samsung and others did the obvious. So how would Apple redefine the smart watch? I thought, and thought. And I drew a blank. Nothing. I kinda 'felt' the first iPhone coming. But not the smart watch. The only reason I came up with was if my smart phone was TOO big to fit/remove from my pants pocket all the time or just use, then a iWatch may be useful. Or maybe I only had my iPad/Tablet in a briefcase, and the iWatch would be useful. But I always have the phone with me, in-between the two. Maybe there is no good reason. Samsung jumped on this early, like with the smart TV sets...as Apple was hinting around them. Maybe Apple will come out with nothing...cause there is nothing really to be done here. Maybe they will. But I don't see myself spending $300 bucks on one no matter how 'sexy' it is made...unless it has some unique function. Sometimes TV/Movies predict the future. StarTrek had the Tricoder...and my iPhone is like one...and I'm happy! But I don't remember anyone on StarTrek having a watch coupled to their Tricorder (am I wrong?). But I admit the StarTrek ' press to talk' chest badge was kinda cool. Maybe we need a iPocketwatch, or iLabelpin that I can tap to communicate with SIRI instead. But that is like my BT headset already. I like the iTiePin/iLabelpin idea better. Less Geeky then an head/earset. Anyhow...do you agree? Would you not be interested in the current versions of smart watches? Most probably have dumped watches completely, and the thought of going back to one, only to repeat what is on your phone...makes no sense. I got a hunch this whole smart watch thing is a bust.
I'm kinda with you, only even more extreme. Every 3 or so years I have to replace the battery in my watch (it's a solar rechargeable). This is about all the effort I'm willing to put in maintaining my watch, regardless of whether it's dumb or smart. So until the smart watch battery can last that long (and obviously hold enough charge overnight to not die before daylight recharges it fully) I have zero interest.
Hold the press, me and VF agree on something! I also don't see the need for a "smart watch". "Google Glasses" sound interesting, but I can't see myself wearing that either (altho a HUD on my car would be cool ) I keep reading alot about "wearable technology" these days, so it seems alot of companies see that as the next frontier. I can see wearing a watch or band (like Alcatel's) if you have a medical condition and need to be monitored, or an athlete who wants to monitor heart-rate, but that's a niche thing and far from the mainstream path where the big sales happen. But who knows, maybe the "wearable technology" is the future. Gerbing fetches $250 for a pair of heated gloves, and sales seem to be good. Maybe put a wifi connection on there too and charge double that. Intel has the "if you build it, they will come" mentality: Looking back to around 2000, I built some of the first 3G networks in the world, everyone wanted fast mobile data speeds, but then after we built it, nobody really "came". The networks were "under-utilized" because nobody knew what to do with the fast speeds, web-browsers didn't really exist on phones then (WAP!) and screens were too small anyway. The operators were waiting for the "killer app" that would make everyone pick up their phones and use data on it. 3G dongles for laptops became slowly available, but operators were so afraid of network congestion that they charged outrageous prices to limit the people using them so they wouldn't crash the network. The 3G nets didn't really become fully utilized until the mid-late 2000's, when screens got bigger and not one "killer app" became available, but rather a bunch of apps became available. Ask AT&T how their data traffic volume changed overnight and crashed their network when suddenly everyone wanted to watch YouTube on the iPhone. So, maybe "wearable technology" doesn't have much appeal right now, but let's wait and see how it evolves over the next decade. Personally, I see more use in embedded technology, machine-to-machine (M2M), but who knows. There's millions of smart and creative people out there, let's see what all these brilliant minds can come up with over time. Throw enough stuff at the wall and something will stick eventually...
Dmapr, yes, I agree. The battery in my Skagen analog watch will last 3 years, maybe 5. No solar though. I could see a analog watch, made from titanium with an e-ink background interesting. But it still would have to do something useful. RR, yes, we do agree here. I thought that I heard a disturbance in the Force this AM. I have the feeling that vendors jumped on this too early, trying to get ahead of Apple, but really didn't put much thought into it. And I doubt that Apple has much to offer too. Here is a pretty decent overview of smart watches seen at CES 2014. CES 2014: Apple's Competition in the Smart Watch Arena - Mac Rumors
I just don't see the use of a smart watch. I am always having my hands on the phone instead. I have several watches, but they are mostly time pieces used to complement what I'm wearing... And I can't see myself paying $250 for a functional accessory. Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
A watch and a bracelet have the same meaning for me, a decorative item that manages to get caught on things, and are not a necessity . So yes, I agree with the others, I do think the vendors jumped on the Smartwatch concept too quickly and there isn't a huge market for it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Apple has been stagnant and Samsung declining a little, so they are both probably under a lot of pressure to find new ways to grow. Apple was talking about it, but has been quiet lately, maybe after seeing Samsung flop they might think twice. There is no real interest in it, and no 'must have' feature it can bring to the table right now.
Stopped in Best Buy to catch up. Saw the Samsung Gear smart watch. One word. Chunky. Apple never came out with a TV or stand alone camera. I wonder if all the rumors and leaks are just meant to throw the competition off track. Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk Pro
I haven't worn a watch in almost a decade, so I don't have the need for a smart watch. But I could see them replacing dumb phones in the future. It could give people another way to control their home alarm or automation system, their cars, and other things in a small and easier to use device. Sent from my RM-940_nam_att_200 using Tapatalk
But I thought smart watch didn't operate without a smartphone. Wouldn't people wanting to replace dumb phones be better off with a dumbphone watch?