This is hilarious... well, at least from where I stand https://twitter.com/tconrad/status/658682973680603136
If you don't stay in the garden, you can't smell the roses. And, per Apple, there are no roses outside the garden.
This is worse than that. You're in the garden, but you can't learn anything about the roses unless you're paying to smell the roses
Takes effort!? Ah, poor baby. Reminds me of George Jetson complaining about is poor button-pushing finger. http://wp6109-flywheel.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/george-jetson-button-pushing.gif
Just a bug not an omission. Doesn't work even with a subscription. Just phrase the question differently. http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/apple/s...ibers-only-n451891?cid=par-time-tech_20151027 Everyone has an agenda. This bug was posted by founder of Pandora . You know that great music service that might be overshadowed by Apple? You guys are the software gurus here? Didn't think to google to figure out the reason? Basic search term search thing bug issue. I guess that wouldn't support your agenda too. Google voice search works on my iPhone last time I used it- a year ago Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn't care enough to research as I don't have any use for this information I was suspicious enough to post this with a question mark though @viewfly, don't you have to start the Google app to use the voice search on iPhone?
Yet you cared enough to waste my time? A five sentence inquiry would have been less effort than your post and would have returned an intelligent answer. It must be the near full moon and Halloween. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A five sentence inquiry? That is a bit of an effort. I can't remember the last time I Googled something 5 sentences long
Ah, but my agenda was not to waste your time (you took that upon yourself), it was to post something on WA. If it generates discussion, great, if it doesn't -- oh well. Also I think that at the time of my post two days ago those links were all the information that was available.
Ah, your link on the Tweet and the NBC link on the correction were all on the 26th, some hours apart. So your post on WA on the 27th was stale news, in fact no news at all, and in fact totally incorrect, even the original tweet. A small bit of research would have detected that. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You mean to say that a small bit of research would've indicated the tweet I linked to was not hilarious to me? I distinctly remember laughing when I saw it, which would indicate to me that my post was in fact totally correct. Unless of course you're reading something I didn't say
I think there is where Captain Kirk looks at Dr. Spock with a raised eyebrow. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk