While looking through the HTC One 440ppi 'retina+' display, I was curious about its all metal design- and how they worked in the externally exposed metal antenna's - we all remember the public relations disaster of the first iPhone 4 and 'antennagate' and how metal antennas exposed on the band or phone exterior was heavily criticized. Well that was resolved with the 4S and then the 5. And a new bumper crop of metal smartphones are out and coming out to attract the high end buyer. The HTC One is all metal, the new Nokia Lumia 925 is metal and the rumored S5 will be Samsung's all metal high end design. Here is a good discussion on the way that HTC designed theirs. And some photos of the Lumia 925, the HTC One. The Nokia is very similar to the iPhone with the top and bottom bands. So too the HTC One with a 'plastic' insert on the top and bottom. Also a diversity antenna that switches between the top and bottom. The iPhone 5 reserves the glass strip on the top/bottom for Wifi/BT, a bit different than the One. But the top/bottom band define the diversity cellular antennas. All interesting stuff...Who says phones are boring? This stuff is neat! AnandTech | The HTC One Review Nokia Lumia 925 - Slim and Lightweight Smartphone with Pureview Camera - Nokia P.S. Having trouble uploading photos. Did I reach a limit?
Here is a video of the Nokia all metal 925 showing the exploded parts of the lens and the Aluminum frame with isolation bands for the external antennas. Looks nice. Much nicer than the polycarbonate ones, IMO. It seems that the 925 has a metal mono frame with glass front and poly back.But the frame supports the antenna...like the iPhones. Explanation from Nokia.....http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/05/23/aerial-view-the-lumia-925-antenna-solution/ Windows OS of course. This may be a winner! [video=youtube_share;0iCu9JrWhww]http://youtu.be/0iCu9JrWhww[/video]
I didn't see any mention of transmit diversity in those articles, and a quick Google came up empty. Can you point to some other articles or explanation of how the HTC, Nokia or iPhone utilizes transmit diversity? I know HSPA, LTE, wifi, etc. can use 2 antennas for spatial multiplexing (MIMO) to achieve higher data rates, but that's different than transmit diversity. I don't think I have ever seen transmit diversity used in cellular. Receive diversity is used at the base station to reduce fading dips and improve signal. And in UMTS the phones there are rake receivers to combat multi-path, but again that receiving, not transmitting. The only example of transmit diversity I can find in cellular networks is a somewhat recent trial by Qualcomm (2010). The benefit of it looks actually better than I expected, but usually when they trial this kind of stuff driving around in a van, it means any commercial implementation of it is several years away. I'd be really surprised if there are already 3 phones commercially available that support it Very interesting to me, but I think it's a safe bet that most people don't get excited and buy phones based on antenna solutions Maybe metal housings tho...
The quotation in my OP is from the linked Anandtech article. That article writes about the iPhone 4S, 5 and HTC One using transmit diversity. I would refer you back to that article to reread it. A quick Google search easily came up with quite a few references to the same, including an Apple Press Release and other articles from 2 years ago. I don't understand why it was difficult for you? 'Diversity' can mean many things, including an intelligent switch. From another article Anandtech: From Apple Press Release on the 4S: There is more...but all this detail is off topic. Receive diversity has been used in Verizon phones for some time. Transmit switching allows the mitigation of a hand covering the top or bottom of the phone. As the Nokia says in their 925 article (above link), covering both will cause a problem...but that is unlikely to happen..."as it is tricky to use the buttons that way"
Interesting, I'm aware receive (Rx) diversity has been used on the network side for a long time, either by 2 Rx antennas (space diversity) or more commonly by cross-polarized antennas within a single housing (polarization diversity). I wasn't really aware that phones were using diversity as well (are they using polarization diversity as well as space dicersity?). I found a Qualcomm research paper dated 2005 which explored Tx/Rx diversity in CDMA handsets: The most recent commercial handset I found was a Palm Pre (2009) that had dual antennas. So I guess the dual antennas in cell-phones began commercially sometime in the late 2000's? In which case I'd say it's relatively "new", at least to someone like me who has been working with cellular since the late 1990's I guess it wasn't used much previously (ie: pre-2005) because of poor processing power of older phones, as well as trying to cram everything into a small device. But as components become smaller, and processing power increases, I can imagine Tx/Rx diversity in the phone itself is something handset mfgrs will explore more of and can probably have some good effects. The "intelligent switching" that Qualcomm described in 2005 and is in use today is just a beginning. As for cell-phones with metal housings, that seems to be a relatively recent thing as well. The first aluminum-body phone I can find was the Nokia N8 released in 2010. It's also the first GSM/UMTS (ie: non-CDMA) phone I found that has dual antennas on it. Normally the antennas are within the casing, and a metal housing would obviously interfere with that. On the Nokia N8, the top and bottom pieces, altho having a metallic-look, are actually plastic, and the antennas are encased there, allowing the phone to have a ~80% metal casing and still have internal antennas. The 2010 Motorola Devour also had a primarily aluminum housing, but had rubberized ends where antennas were located: External antenna bands on phones with 100% metal casing, ala the iPhone, HTC One, Nokia Lumia, etc, obviously needs to be designed with a great deal of care, and have very good isolation, as hands touching exposed antennas can degrade the signal. Altho I can agree a brushed-aluminum casing has a nice look and feel, I'm still "old-school" and prefer a rubberized exterior, mainly it's the non-slip properties.
No phone can be 100% metal casing as one larger surface, the touch glass screen, is not obviously. Perhaps not even the back, which may be plastic or glass. This thread is about unibody cell phone construction where exposed, external parts of the unibody are the radiating/receiving antennas, and the solutions undertaken to make that successful. Interesting to see other manufacturers taking the same approach, after the commercial success of the GSM iPhone 4, especially with the RF success of the Verizon iPhone 4 and the GSM/CDMA 4S and the LTE/CDMA/GSM iPhone 5. The rumor mill is that the Samsung S5 will be of a similar design, but who really knows.