Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Residents rage over antennas

Discussion in 'Western US Wireless Forum' started by larry, Aug 1, 2008.

  1. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,722
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Residents rage over antennas
    Foothill building's tenants, neighbors vow to appeal approval of new cellular devices.
    By Jason Wells
    Published: Last Updated Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:15 PM PDT
    LA CRESCENTA — County planning commissioners on Wednesday approved 12 cellular antennas for the rooftop of a Foothill Boulevard office building, infuriating its tenants and nearby residents who say the equipment could pose health risks and wreck local aesthetics.

    Opponents of the project on Thursday vowed to appeal the unanimous decision of the Los Angeles County Regional Planning Commission to allow Sprint-Nextel to erect the 6-foot-tall cellular antennas and a global positioning system antenna behind screens atop the three-story office building at 2450 Foothill Blvd.

    Chris Workman, who lives behind the building in the 2500 block of Community Avenue, said she and her husband, Glen, would file the $775 appeal to the county Board of Supervisors and seek help from the community in forming a coalition in opposition to the project.

    "We are doing it not just for ourselves," she said. "I will not live here with another (antenna) in my face. Enough's enough."

    Federal regulatory agencies maintain that telecommunications facilities, including cellular antennas and towers, do not pose a significant health risk to nearby residents, but opponents of the equipment say those findings are based on ambiguous research.

    Local governments and commissions have, under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, been unable to consider the potential ill health effects of radio waves or radiation when hearing an application to install communications equipment, forcing opponents to center their protests on aesthetic grounds.

    Even then, architectural masking — fake trees, paneling, textures and other tools — has often been enough to persuade local land-use commissions and court judges to approve the applications.

    "It's almost like, what can we do?" said Kristen Wheatley, an employee of Monarch E&S Insurance Services, which occupies the entire first floor of the 2540 Foothill Blvd. building.

    Executives for the company, which recently re-signed a 10-year lease for the space, said their employees feared the antennas' potential health effects so much that several have threatened to leave the company.

    With that in mind, Monarch managers on Thursday said that if the antennas cannot be blocked, they will consider breaking their lease and moving elsewhere.

    "We're not going to lose our employees . . . just because [the landlord] wants to make more money," said Hanriette Avedian, a vice president for the company.

    The building's owner could not be reached for comment Thursday.

    Sprint-Nextel spokeswoman Kathleen Dunleavy defended the planned antennas as necessary to fill in what is considered a relative dead zone in terms of signal strength.

    "If a paying customer wanted to use the high-speed network, they could not in that area," Dunleavy said.

    The antennas will stand about 6 feet tall and be shielded by screens that will be painted and textured to blend in with the building's facade, according to plans submitted to the county.

    Property owners — public and private — typically make thousands of dollars each year in land-lease agreements to telecommunications companies seeking to expand their service areas.

    The Glendale City Council in May approved a Metro PCS cellular tower in the form of a 60-foot flagpole at a community park in a 10-year land lease deal worth $2,500 per month. That rate will increase by 4% each year.

    Dunleavy would not disclose the leasing terms for the Sprint-Nextel antennas.

    The Crescenta Valley Town Council, which has been careful in its opposition to steer clear of directly accusing the antennas of being harmful to public health, has backed opponents of the project in collecting signatures for an online opposition petition.

    The petition calls on county officials to halt construction of the antennas until independent studies on the potential health effects of radio frequency radiation on people can be completed.

    Dunleavy, backed by federal findings, said there is no evidence that radio waves from the antennas negatively affect public health.

    But nearby residents and building tenants remain unconvinced, and many said they would support an appeal of the planning commission's decision to the county Board of Supervisors.

    Paul Novak, planning deputy for county Supervisor Michael Antonovich, whose district includes La Crescenta, said appeals to cellular equipment applications at that level are relatively rare.

    A spokesman for Antonovich said issuing an opinion on the Sprint-Nextel application would be inappropriate until a potential appeals hearing is held.

    Opponents have until Aug. 13 to file an appeal, according to the county Department of Regional Planning.

    Appeals typically take several months to reach the board.
     
  2. budney

    budney Resident Headbanger
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,861
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    14
    Likes Received:
    341
    Location:
    Eugene, OR
    My Phone:
    iPhone 6s+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    When will people learn that the air they breath inside a building and outside will shorten their lives way more then any cell tower will.

    And to Monarch, great PR job.But are you serious?
     
  3. TelcomJunkie

    TelcomJunkie Bad Handoff Investigator
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,355
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    151
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    The 4145
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Big Brother
    Keep wasting that taxpayer dollar!
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. M in LA

    M in LA Mobile 28 Years Plus
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    347
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Phone:
    iPhone 13 Pro Max, XS Max
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon (since 1994)
    I guess they have nothing better to do in La Crescenta. :rolleyes:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2022 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice