Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Republican lawmakers say Google "gamed" 700Mhz auction

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by Eric47, Apr 16, 2008.

  1. Eric47

    Eric47 Bronze Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,400
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    49
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    in my own house
    My Phone:
    crackberry's
    Republican lawmakers say Google "gamed" 700Mhz auction - Engadget

    and

    Bloomberg.com: News



    By Molly Peterson

    April 15 (Bloomberg) -- Google Inc. manipulated a U.S. government spectrum auction by bidding just enough to trigger rules that will open a nationwide set of airwaves to any device and then walking away, Republican lawmakers said.

    The so-called open-access requirements, also backed by consumer groups, may have shortchanged taxpayers by discouraging more companies from bidding, Representative Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, said today at a hearing.

    ``Google was successful in gaming the system,'' Upton said. The rules were a ``social engineering'' experiment by the Federal Communications Commission that prevented the spectrum swath, known as the C-block, from raising billions of dollars more, he said.

    Google offered $4.71 billion for the C-block, surpassing a $4.6 billion threshold that activated the rules. Verizon Wireless later won the airwaves with a $4.74 billion offer. Google, the most-used search engine, said that while it was prepared to win the airwaves, its main goal was to ensure the open-access rules took effect.

    Republican Representatives Cliff Stearns of Florida and John Shimkus of Illinois echoed Upton's comments. Shimkus asked whether Google had ``duped'' the FCC by bidding primarily to trigger the open-access rules.

    FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said the agency wasn't duped, adding that the rules weren't designed to prevent any company from bidding.

    ``My goal was to make sure that whoever won the C-block had an open platform,'' Martin, a Republican, told the House telecommunications subcommittee.

    More Choices

    The rules aim to boost consumer choice by requiring the C- block winner to let any legal wireless handset or program use the network. Opening the network to more devices may help Mountain View, California-based Google sell more advertising on phones by expanding consumers' access to mobile Web content.

    The auction raised a record amount of revenue and created ``historic new rights'' for wireless subscribers ``as a direct result of Google's bidding,'' company spokesman Adam Kovacevich said.

    ``By any measure, that's a huge success for consumers, and we're proud of our role in helping make that happen,'' Kovacevich said today in an e-mailed statement.

    Google said months before the auction that it would bid enough to trigger the open-access rules if the agency adopted them, Democratic FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said.

    ``They put over $4.6 billion of their capital at risk,'' Adelstein said in an interview after the hearing. ``That's not a game. That's real money that could have come out of their pocket if Verizon hadn't come out and bid more.''

    The C-block comprises about a third of the auctioned airwaves, which will become available when television broadcasters switch to digital signals in 2009. The auction, which ended March 18 after two months of bidding, raised $19 billion, exceeding government projections of as much as $15 billion.

    To contact the reporter on this story: Molly Peterson in Washington at mpeterson9@bloomberg.net
    Last Updated: April 15, 2008 20:54 EDT
     
  2. M in LA

    M in LA Mobile 28 Years Plus
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    347
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Phone:
    iPhone 13 Pro Max, XS Max
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon (since 1994)
    What do they REALLY DO in Washington???:confused:

    I have a hard time believing what Google did was a surprise to these "lawmakers"...:rolleyes:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. strunke

    strunke .:|Always Covered|:.
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    BVR
    My Phone:
    Blackberry 8230, KRZR K1m
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial
    Seems like it shouldn't surprise anyone. They did do it obviously.

    Fred Upton is a good man though, not corrupt like the leaders of congress....

    I wonder if this will go anywhere....
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Eric47

    Eric47 Bronze Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,400
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    49
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    in my own house
    My Phone:
    crackberry's
    well its mid to late 09 before TV has to get off those airwaves, and then i believe that it still cant be used for wireless until "the FCC says OK " so there is plenty of time for things to develop from all of this.
     
  5. AnthroMatt

    AnthroMatt Big Meanie
    Super Moderator Junior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    9,257
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    2
    Likes Received:
    195
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    My Phone:
    Apple iPhone 13 Pro
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, AT&T Prepaid
    So stupid. We all know what Google was up to. And like Adelstein said, nothing was in place that forced Verizon to outbid Google.

    Besides, if companies only view spectrum as valuable when they can have a "closed" system in place in the PUBLIC airwaves, then I think that is a bigger problem.

    If the lawmakers are upset that the open access clause that Google triggered might have cost the government some revenue, they shouldn't be upset at Google's bid, but at the FCC for implementing the open access provision. If the clause was in place but Google had not bid, the lawmakers are basically claiming the auction would have netted even less money, since companies would have kept their bids low so as not to trigger the clause. So in that case, Google actually helped raise more money for the Feds since they pushed the bidding past the open access threshold.
     
  6. Eric47

    Eric47 Bronze Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,400
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    49
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    in my own house
    My Phone:
    crackberry's
    i love how google CEO's make a $1 salary yearly LOL. they do however get by on a measely $100 mill in stock, but that is all variable....shows alot of confidence in their company, for that i take my hat off to them. but this whole open access still seems like a toss up in the air, no one really knows how it will play out or if it will even become profitable. you may even see verizon use it in a strategic way so that it is not useful for the Google's that wanto use it..for instance, only using it in rural areas and not in major areas.
     

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice