New Poll Shows NY Consumers Reject More Wireless Regulations By more than a 2-to-1 margin (56% to 24%), wireless phone users in New York oppose adding new state government regulations on their wireless service, according to a poll released today by consumer advocacy group MyWireless.org. The bipartisan survey of 800 likely voters who are also wireless phone users, conducted by McLaughlin & Associates and Penn, Schoen, & Berland Associates, found that more than 84% are satisfied with their cell phone service, and that "protecting consumers' rights" ranks at the bottom of the list of issues most important in deciding their votes for Governor and State Legislature. This survey mirrors two recent studies from the University of Michigan and J.D. Power and Associates that found overall wireless customer satisfaction has increased markedly. The data also corresponds with recent Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reports that show wireless-related complaints decreased 6.9% since the end of the 4th Quarter in 2005. The FCC report (covering the 1st Quarter of 2006) also shows that for every 1 million wireless subscribers, there are only 22 complaints registered with the FCC, or 0.002%. According to the MyWireless.org survey, 7 in 10 New Yorkers (70%) believe new state regulations would make their service more expensive. 71% of consumers believe adding new state government regulations on cell phone service would make service worse or would do nothing to improve it, compared with 14% who believe new regulations would improve wireless services. If a "bill of rights" would ultimately raise the price for wireless phone service, more than three-quarters (78%) of New Yorkers would not be willing to pay more for such provisions. When asked whether lawmakers should pass a cell phone "bill of rights" to provide more consumer protections, a majority (52%) said such regulations would cause New Yorkers to pay higher prices and have fewer choices for wireless phone service. Less than one-third (32%) of wireless phone consumers support such legislation, which is currently being considered in the New York State Assembly. "These survey results highlight the fact that there is absolutely no consumer mandate for the state government to add more costly and complicated regulations on wireless phone service," said Kimberly Kuo, Executive Director of MyWireless.org. "New Yorkers are highly satisfied with their wireless services, and also strongly opposed to unnecessary regulations that will raise their wireless prices. The so-called 'cell phone bill of rights' is a solution searching for a problem that doesn't exist." 60% of New Yorkers surveyed believe existing competition among wireless providers means consumers receive quality services, and less than one-third (31%) think the state government needs to add more regulations in this area. Only 1% of voters surveyed ranked "protecting consumer's rights" as an issue in deciding their votes for Governor and State Legislature, well behind "creating jobs and improving the state's economy" (24%), "preventing tax increases" (19%), "reducing wasteful government spending" (17%), "providing affordable health care" (14%) and "improving education" (12%). "What wireless consumers are telling us they care about is keeping prices low, innovation swift, and choices broad. There is obviously very little public support for the Assembly's so-called 'Wireless Telephone Service Consumer Protection Act' among the New Yorkers this legislation purports to protect," added Kuo. "If lawmakers really want to protect consumers, they should address the outrageous 22% wireless taxes New Yorkers pay every month — the third highest in the nation." http://www.wirelessiq.com/content/newsfeed/7402.html
Another version of that story Wireless bill may cost consumers more by Amanda Fung June 06, 2006 The state Assembly's consumer affairs committee approved a bill that would offer greater consumer protection but make service more expensive. The New York State Assembly's consumer affairs committee approved Tuesday a bill that would offer greater consumer protection, but critics say it will make service more expensive. The Wireless Telephone Service Consumer Protection Act will require wireless companies to disclose of all fees, allow people to cancel their contracts without a penalty, provide more detailed coverage maps and disclose to customers the cell phone E-911 capabilities. "The need for consumer protection in this unregulated industry is critical. Cell phone users should know their rights as a consumer will be enforced under this legislation," said Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, who sponsored the bill, in a recent statement. Lois Aronstein, the director of the New York state chapter of the AARP, which is pushing for the legislation, recently said “the cell phone industry has now out-ranked used car dealers as the most complained about industry in the nation.” But advocacy groups such as Mywireless.org disagree. These critics side with wireless providers who say adhering to these additional rules will cost them money. And those costs would get passed on to the consumer. According to a recent Mywireless.org survey, about 70% of New Yorkers said new state regulations on cell phone service would make service more expensive, worse or do nothing to improve it. More than 78% of respondents said they would not be willing to pay more for the protection.' Research firms McLaughlin & Associates, and Penn Schoen & Berland Associates conducted the survey of 800 New York cell phone users for Mywireless.org http://www.newyorkbusiness.com/news.cms?id=13831
Personally I fail to see how these requirements, with the exception of the provision to allow contract cancellations, would cost consumers more. Full fee disclosure might cause monetory loss if it discourages people from signing up for service who might otherwise be in for a rude surprise when their first bill arrives and it is too late to cancel. Detailed coverage maps are already provided by T-Mobile and that does not appear to have hurt the number four carrier or increased prices. Disclosing the E-911 capabilities of a phone is a documentation issue for the manufacturer of the phone not the carrier unless the carrier has absolutely no E-911 capabilities other than triangulation.