Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

No more Windows Mobile phones from Palm

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by charlyee, Sep 18, 2009.

  1. charlyee

    charlyee Ultimate Insanity
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    9,906
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1,586
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    My Phone:
    iPhone X
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t/Airtel/Turkcell
    No more Windows Mobile phones from Palm
    Nancy Gohring 17.09.2009 kl 22:40 | IDG News Service


    Palm said it will stop developing new phones running Windows Mobile software, instead focusing future development on its new WebOS operating system.

    ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    In the future, Palm plans to focus solely on WebOS rather than developing phones that run operating systems from other vendors like Microsoft. "While there are still Centros and Treos moving through the channel, our future engineering efforts are based around WebOS," Rubinstein said. The Centro runs Palm OS, Palm's previous operating system, and the Treo runs Windows.

    The appeal of the Pre to business customers--a segment that Windows has traditionally appealed to--may have helped Palm decide to focus on its own phones and drop Windows. "We found early on that demand [from businesses] was stronger than expected," Rubinstein said. As a result, Palm has accelerated updates to the WebOS platform, such as improved Exchange security policies, that business users want, he said.

    Though Palm probably did not make up a major share of Windows sales, the news is probably a blow to Microsoft, which has struggled to keep up in an increasingly competitive mobile market. Updated Windows phones running version 6.5 will come in early October, but the more significant upgrade--the apparent response to the launch of the iPhone two years ago--won't arrive until next year.

    "Palm has been and remains a great partner to Microsoft, and they are one of the many companies we work with to deliver a compelling range of mobile offerings," a Microsoft spokesman said in a statement.


    Details/Source
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. Critic

    Critic The Digital Ruler
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Princeton NJ
    My Phone:
    Apple iPhone 3G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Meh. It was pretty clear (to me, anyway) that Palm was using WinMo as a stopgap/bridge OS to keep the company afloat while they built the WebOS (and got themselves out from under the thumb of ACCESS). I'm not overly surprised by this. Realistically, could they focus on a new OS AND continue to innovate on WinMo enough to keep up with the likes of HTC?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. charlyee

    charlyee Ultimate Insanity
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    9,906
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1,586
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    My Phone:
    iPhone X
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t/Airtel/Turkcell
    Wirelessly posted (Treo Pro: Palm850/v0100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11))

    It should not come as a surprise. I along with many loyal Palm users, migrated to WM only because of the Treos, which were not standard HTC devices but had many Palm tweaks incorporated.

    I see this as an excellent & timely shift in strategy. I am very happy with my Treo Pro, but I am quite sure that there will be an appropriate GSM Palm Web OS device in my future.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #3 charlyee, Sep 18, 2009
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2009
  4. RadioRaiders

    RadioRaiders RF Black-Belt
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,074
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    464
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Wireless Provider(s):
    GSM / WCDMA /LTE
    I just got a BlackJack II a few weeks ago to learn some WinMob programming. WinMob has some good programming support, but I don't really like the Windows interface on my phone. On a PC it's fine, but somehow doesn't translate well to a phone, in my opinion. I'm glad to see more Linux-based phones OS's like Symbian, Android and now webOS. I think Linux is a great platform for phones.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Shizam76

    Shizam76 Shizam! Babyyyyy!
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,145
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    95
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Illinois
    My Phone:
    Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t
    I'm with you Charlyee! I can't stand my Treo sometimes because of WM. I have had to hard reset twice because of it. Sometimes I can just throw this thing out my car window I get so mad sometimes.
     
  6. RadioFoneGuy

    RadioFoneGuy Powered by HTC FUZE
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,235
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    6
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Everywhere.
    My Phone:
    Nokia 6103, 6010, 2260
    Wireless Provider(s):
    The death star formally known as Cell One.
    I think Palm should carry both for a few years as it give them a foot in two doors. Some phone may prefer the WM over Web OS.

    I would have bought a Palm a few times if it werent for the keyboard designs.

    RR you have to get a Windows Mobile Pro device with a touch screen thats when they become more fun to play with. I have had a couple of HTC Tilt, Fuze and a couple others.
     
  7. budney

    budney Resident Headbanger
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,861
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    14
    Likes Received:
    341
    Location:
    Eugene, OR
    My Phone:
    iPhone 6s+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    I agree, Palm should keep WM for another two years at least. WebOS just isn't ready for primetime quite yet. They need to expand their app library, offer more features, and customization.

    As much as I liked my Moto Q, I will not go back to WM standard. WM Pro is just much easier to use, customize, and has better apps.
     
  8. RadioFoneGuy

    RadioFoneGuy Powered by HTC FUZE
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,235
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    6
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Everywhere.
    My Phone:
    Nokia 6103, 6010, 2260
    Wireless Provider(s):
    The death star formally known as Cell One.
    once you have played with Pro, WM standard seems lame.
     
  9. strunke

    strunke .:|Always Covered|:.
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    BVR
    My Phone:
    Blackberry 8230, KRZR K1m
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial
    Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.60 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.2.14912/960; U; en) Presto/2.2.0)

    I second the touch screen thing. I played with windows mobile on the moto Q. I couldn't stand it. The I used a HTC 6800 it's like night and day...
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice