Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

News Article Correction: Cingular NOT changing its name to AT&T

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by ComicalMoodyDan, Nov 21, 2005.

  1. ComicalMoodyDan

    ComicalMoodyDan Gold Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2001
    Messages:
    6,302
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Kingsport, TN
    My Phone:
    LG Volt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Sprint
    New AT&T planning wireless service using Cingular network
    By Dan Meyer
    Nov 21, 2005

    SAN ANTONIO-SBC Communications Inc. is reportedly planning to launch an AT&T branded wireless service that will use the network of SBC's current wireless joint venture, Cingular Wireless L.L.C. SBC's plans follow the closing last weekend of its $16 billion acquisition of AT&T Corp.

    Contrary to published reports, Cingular said it is not changing its name to AT&T.

    "We are continuing with the strong Cingular brand that we have spent the past five years building and promoting," said Cingular spokesman Clay Owen.

    SBC's chairman and chief executive officer Ed Whitacre said in an interview over the weekend that Cingular would drop its brand name for the AT&T brand in most of its markets. BellSouth Corp., which controls the 40 percent of Cingular, said in the story that it did not have any objections to the name change.

    Owen said Whitacre's comments were related to SBC-which changed its name to AT&T following the purchase-and its plans to launch an AT&T branded wireless service that it would sell in select markets using Cingular's network. Owen likened the set-up to Sprint Nextel Corp.'s extensive mobile virtual network operator agreements.

    Cingular was formed by the combination of SBC and BellSouth's wireless businesses in 2001 and quickly became the industry's second largest player, standing behind Verizon Wireless and ahead of AT&T Wireless Services Inc. Owen noted that when the Cingular venture was formed, both SBC and BellSouth reserved the right to launch separately branded wireless services.

    Cingular pushed past Verizon Wireless last year as the industry's largest operator following its $41 billion acquisition of AWS. However, as part of the agreement, Cingular was forced to sign away rights to the AT&T brand name back to AT&T, which had announced plans to launch a wireless service using Sprint Nextel CDMA network.

    AT&T then scuttled those plans earlier this year when SBC announced plans to acquire AT&T. AT&T said at the time it was still looking at launching an AT&T branded wireless service, but would instead use Cingular's network.

    Analysts have noted that the AT&T brand is one of the most recognized names in the world, and was the main reason SBC decided to change its name to AT&T following its acquisition.

    http://www.rcrnews.com/news.cms?newsId=24896
     
  2. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002
    GOOD! That would be a very dumb idea
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Gideon H

    Gideon H Quase Três Anos Com WA!
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Higienópolis, São Paulo
    My Phone:
    Motorola E398
    Wireless Provider(s):
    TIM Brasil
    WOW they responded quickly to the outpouring of bad responses to that...
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. jones

    jones Silver Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Messages:
    3,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    They realize it cost lots of Money
    to change Names.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
    They did respond fast, but I was very surprised at them changing the Cingular name back to AT&T when I read other articles this morning.
     
  6. ShoresGuy

    ShoresGuy Euer WA Experte in Europa
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    6,529
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    419
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    94065,US/Köln, Germany
    My Phone:
    HTC/T-Mobile MDA II PPC
    Wireless Provider(s):
    E-Plus (BASE 12 month flatrate)/Vodafone Germany
    It makes you wonder: What the heck for?!! What amazes me even more is that SBC wants to market an AT&T MVNO on Cingular in certain markets.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. Critic

    Critic The Digital Ruler
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Princeton NJ
    My Phone:
    Apple iPhone 3G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    There are people for whom the AT&T name still carries a lot of weight. That said, it does seem somewhat counter-intuitive to throw money (through promotion and branding, primarily) at a product that would have to, essentially, be Cingular dressed in its father's clothes. The only upside I see here is that the ATTWS MVNO allows the "new" AT&T (a/k/a the "old" SBC) to sell wireless to their wireline customers as a bundled product without 'competing' against Cingular.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. KevinJames

    KevinJames WA's 1st retired mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    4,044
    Likes Received:
    739
    Location:
    Central Valley NorCA
    My Phone:
    Samsung S7-Edge
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T & Verizon
    Actually, the focus is not concern over consumers like you and I at all. It is concern about the business customers.

    Well, we'll have to see. All the internal announcements at the new at&t are indeed pointing to renaming the company. Ed is CEO of of the new at&t and the "biggest" name in the company right now. So any other comments from other sources I would take with a grain of salt.

    And Mr. Clay Owen is no one in any position to challenge Mr. Ed. He is just a "media contact"

    http://www.cingular.com/about/latest_news/03_03_18
     
  9. Critic

    Critic The Digital Ruler
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Princeton NJ
    My Phone:
    Apple iPhone 3G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    This just in - Generalismo Francisco Franco is STILL DEAD.

    Good night, and have a pleasant tomorrow.

    =)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. jones

    jones Silver Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Messages:
    3,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    will Generalismo Francisco Franco rise?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    I guess part of it had to do with AT&T was planning on selling a wireless service as an MVNO thru Sprint & I am sure SBC/AT&T are looking for people that want to go back to the AT&T name, even though it's service is Cingular and it would bring in more money for both companies if people do go this route.
    Also as critic stated, they can sell bundled services with the AT&T name depending on how they want to market it.

    I have been seeing alot of SBC commericals on TV lately (mainly on Spike TV), and as of Sunday they are mentioning they are now the new AT&T and the commercials talk about bundle service's.
     
  12. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12,735
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    50
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Well, if they bundle AT&T MVNO with a VoIP service, they can count me in.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    8,446
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    293
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    EnV
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    Well since I have AT&T VoIP service already and an AT&T Landline, and am still a Blue customer, I am 75% there. :browani:
     

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice