Nope. Maybe Metro should have ANY type of modem, and not just some POS Samsung dumb phone. _________________________ MetroPCS brings its LTE network to Boston, Sacramento, and New York City -- Engadget MetroPCS brings its LTE network to Boston, Sacramento, and New York City By Chris Ziegler posted Dec 15th 2010 12:10PM Regional carrier MetroPCS is ticking three more checkboxes today as it keeps pushing its ongoing LTE network rollout, and they're big ones: on top of Sacramento, they've added Boston and none other than New York City. That makes the carrier second to launch LTE in the Big Apple -- Verizon's already there -- but you can't take away from the fact that MetroPCS beat the big guys with their first live commercial markets by several months. As for hardware, it's the same as usual: the Samsung Craft dumbphone is your only option, which means that if you're looking to blaze on your notebook with a next-gen USB stick, you're still going to have to head to Verizon anyway. Follow the break for the full press release.
MetroPCS's "LTE" network is almost as fast as T-Mobile's so called "4G" HSPA network, which apparently isn't as fast as they claim it is. It may be LTE in name, but the speeds are far less than AT&T, Verizon (3G & LTE) and Sprint's WiMAX. Budget LTE from a budget carrier. This is probably why hardly anybody notices or cares... MetroPCS not bringing speed but LTE innovation - FierceWireless - 4G - Your World... Faster MetroPCS Launches LTE, but Speed Is Not the Focus | Current Analysis
How can anyone even test the speeds of the network if the only device out there for it is this crappy dumb phone? I'm sure that thing does not use the full speed of the network. I want a USB modem, damn it!
The fact that they have a Swiss cheese network tells the story. Besides there have been a few reports mentioning that, although they were the "first" launching LTE, faster data speeds are not the primary focus or intent. There is no such thing as LTE roaming at the moment, so once you leave their limited service area, you'd lose whatever minuscule speed bump you were getting. I doubt an LTE USB modem for Metro is going to become a reality any time soon.
Metro claims that my home area in NY is covered by LTE, though I don't recall seeing any of their towers with new panels. Unless something changed in the last few weeks, I think their maps may be lying. Also, what freq are they running LTE on, 1700?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148a Safari/6533.18.5) How does Metro advertise 4G when only a handful of sites are actually turned up? I'm not even talking about the massive holes in coverage. I know they are working on coverage and will eventually become a player but their ads seem over rated to me.