Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

How many wireless carriers do we need?

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by Fire14, Sep 14, 2009.

  1. Fire14

    Fire14 Easy,Cheap & Sleazy
    Senior Member

    Sep 27, 2002
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    Likes Received:
    Union County NJ
    My Phone:
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Fewer players in wireless could rein in price cuts

    T-Mobile looking at Sprint? Wireless industry could see some consolidation, analysts say

    How many wireless carriers do we need? It's a question that's popping up again as T-Mobile USA is said to be looking at buying Sprint Nextel Corp.

    Now that most people have a cell phone and once-heady growth in the industry is slowing, analysts say carriers are going to be looking at buying each other to increase their scale and to avoid competing too much on price. Consumers have been benefiting from relentless price-cutting on cell phone service in the past few years.

    But consolidation doesn't come easy to the industry, and the government may not look kindly on the combinations that reduce competition.

    U.K.'s Sunday Daily Telegraph reported that T-Mobile USA's owner, Deutsche Telekom AG, has hired banking advisers to explore a bid for Sprint Nextel Corp.

    It's not the first time there has been talk of such a combination, and the buyer would have significant hurdles to overcome. But if it were consummated, analysts say, it could at least momentarily put the price-slashing on hold.

    "The U.S. wireless market is crying out for consolidation," Sanford Bernstein analyst Craig Moffett told investors in a research note Monday. He added that "there are too many cooks in the kitchen."

    Deutsche Telekom and Sprint wouldn't comment.

    Sprint's stock jumped on the news, gaining 38 cents, or 10 percent, to close at $4.15, giving it a market capitalization of $11.7 billion. Deutsche Telekom's U.S.-listed shares fell 8 cents, or 0.6 percent, to $13.79.

    This year has seen dramatic price cuts on wireless service, particularly for customers who don't have contracts and go month to month on "prepaid" plans. Sprint, through its Boost Mobile brand, introduced a $50 prepaid unlimited-calling plan in January. Virgin Mobile followed suit, and regional upstarts Leap Wireless International Inc. and MetroPCS Communications Inc., which were already around the $50 mark for unlimited service, have trimmed prices too.

    Those cuts are starting to spill over into the more common plans with two-year contracts, for so-called "postpaid" service. Last week, Sprint announced it new postpaid plans starting at $70 per month in which calls to other cell phones would not be deducted from the monthly bucket of minutes.

    The price cuts are coming as growth in the wireless industry has slowed sharply, particularly when it comes to new contract-signing customers. At the end of last year, there were 87 cell phone subscriptions for every 100 Americans, according to the CTIA-The Wireless Association.

    Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc., the No. 1 and No. 2 in the industry, have been grabbing most of the remaining customers who are willing and able to sign two-year contracts — Verizon because it has the best network, AT&T because it has the iPhone.

    That leaves No. 3 Sprint and No. 4 T-Mobile USA scrambling for lower-paying prepaid customers, where they are also competing with smaller carriers like MetroPCS and Leap.

    A big obstacle to a merger would be that Sprint and T-Mobile use incompatible technologies: Sprint phones wouldn't work on T-Mobile's network, and vice versa. Sprint is still dealing with the aftermath of such an acquisition. It bought Nextel, another carrier with an incompatible network, in 2005. That combination has been fraught with problems, and is a major reason Sprint is losing subscribers.

    Antitrust concerns could also derail a deal. The Obama administration has signaled a tougher stance toward the wireless industry, and has started looking into practices like exclusive contracts between phone makers and the carriers.

    Moffett noted that the Department of Justice has rejected mergers in industries with a similar concentration of players. However, a combined T-Mobile and Sprint could offer more effective competition to AT&T and Verizon, he noted.

    In May, when the latest round of speculation about a T-Mobile-Sprint combination was in the air, Stifel Nicolaus analysts said a deal would likely pass antitrust muster as long as the companies could present a credible story about being stronger combined than apart. AT&T and Verizon Wireless are gearing up for the next round of network upgrades, and it could benefit consumers if there's a credible competitor that can offer similar data speeds.

    Sprint had 48.8 million subscribers at the end of June, compared to T-Mobile USA's 33.5 million. Together, they would have had 82.3 million, placing them in between Verizon with 87.7 million and AT&T with 79.6 million.

    The U.S. wireless industry is already consolidating, but at a moderate pace, with most of the acquired companies being regional carriers. Since Sprint bought Nextel, the largest deal has been Verizon Wireless buying Alltel Corp., once the No. 5 in the industry by subscriber count, in January for $5.9 billion. Sprint has announced a $483 million deal to buy Virgin Mobile USA Inc., increasing its focus on the prepaid market. Virgin phones already use Sprint's network.

    In another sign of Deutsche Telekom's desire for consolidation, it said last week that it plans to merge its British wireless unit with that of France Telecom SA to form that country's biggest mobile operator.

    Ironically, the biggest beneficiaries of a T-Mobile-Sprint deal could be AT&T and Verizon Wireless. Moffett notes that those companies would benefit from a "more rational" price structure, with fewer players to compete on pricing, while avoiding the messy process of a merger themselves.

    AT&T shares fell 13 cents to $26.53. Shares of Verizon Communications Inc., the majority owner of Verizon Wireless, fell 19 cents to $31.07.

    Fewer Players in Wireless Could Rein in Price Cuts
  2. Der84

    Der84 EH!
    Senior Member

    Jun 24, 2008
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    Likes Received:
    My Phone:
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Rogers (2007-2011) Bell (2011-present)
    Hmm... now I don't see why they would want to help AT&T and Verizon (2 of the biggest competitors). That and T-Mobile and Sprint operate on two different networks, unless Sprint was ever to go GSM, then wouldn't that make more sense for the merge? Unless I'm missing something here.

    That would be a possible case here in Canada where all 3 major carriers (Rogers, Telus and Bell) are all GSM.
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. bobolito

    bobolito Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    May 3, 2002
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    Likes Received:
    in front of my computer
    My Phone:
    iPhone SE
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Can you imagine a T-Mobile larger than AT&T with 80+ million customers? LOL!
    For competition sake, I hope this doesn't happen.
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2020 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

Positive SSL
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice