Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Holy $*&#, AT&T buys T-Mobile USA

Discussion in 'Wireless News' started by Yankees368, Mar 20, 2011.

  1. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002
    Uhm, ok. I don't think anyone saw this coming. There were rumblings of T-Mobile getting along with Sprint, but never AT&T. This will put AT&T as the real #1 in terms of total users. WOAH.

    AT&T aquiring T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telecom « The Cell Phone Junkie

    In a surprising move on Sunday, AT&T announced it’s pans to acquire T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom for $39 billion.

    Press Release:
    AT&T to Acquire T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom

    Provides Fast, Efficient and Certain Solution to Impending Spectrum Exhaust Challenges Facing AT&T and T-Mobile USA in Key Markets Due to Explosive Demand for Mobile Broadband

    Enhances Network Capacity, Output and Quality in Near Term for Both Companies’ Customers

    AT&T Commits to Expand 4G LTE Deployment to an Additional 46.5 Million Americans, Including in Rural, Smaller Communities, for a Total of 294 Million or 95% of the U.S. Population

    Provides 4G LTE Service for T-Mobile USA’s 34 Million Subscribers

    More Than $8 Billion in Incremental Infrastructure Spend by a U.S. Company over Seven Years, Enabling Nation’s High-Tech Industry, Innovation and Economic Growth

    Creates Substantial Value for AT&T Shareholders Through Large, Straightforward Synergies

    DALLAS & BONN, Germany–(BUSINESS WIRE)–AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Deutsche Telekom AG (FWB: DTE) today announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which AT&T will acquire T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom in a cash-and-stock transaction currently valued at approximately $39 billion. The agreement has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies.

    “every part of America to the digital age.”

    AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile USA provides an optimal combination of network assets to add capacity sooner than any alternative, and it provides an opportunity to improve network quality in the near term for both companies’ customers. In addition, it provides a fast, efficient and certain solution to the impending exhaustion of wireless spectrum in some markets, which limits both companies’ ability to meet the ongoing explosive demand for mobile broadband.

    With this transaction, AT&T commits to a significant expansion of robust 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) deployment to 95 percent of the U.S. population to reach an additional 46.5 million Americans beyond current plans – including rural communities and small towns. This helps achieve the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and President Obama’s goals to connect “every part of America to the digital age.” T-Mobile USA does not have a clear path to delivering LTE.

    “This transaction represents a major commitment to strengthen and expand critical infrastructure for our nation’s future,” said Randall Stephenson, AT&T Chairman and CEO. “It will improve network quality, and it will bring advanced LTE capabilities to more than 294 million people. Mobile broadband networks drive economic opportunity everywhere, and they enable the expanding high-tech ecosystem that includes device makers, cloud and content providers, app developers, customers, and more. During the past few years, America’s high-tech industry has delivered innovation at unprecedented speed, and this combination will accelerate its continued growth.”

    Stephenson continued, “This transaction delivers significant customer, shareowner and public benefits that are available at this level only from the combination of these two companies with complementary network technologies, spectrum positions and operations. We are confident in our ability to execute a seamless integration, and with additional spectrum and network capabilities, we can better meet our customers’ current demands, build for the future and help achieve the President’s goals for a high-speed, wirelessly connected America.”

    Deutsche Telekom Chairman and CEO René Obermann said, “After evaluating strategic options for T-Mobile USA, I am confident that AT&T is the best partner for our customers, shareholders and the mobile broadband ecosystem. Our common network technology makes this a logical combination and provides an efficient path to gaining the spectrum and network assets needed to provide T-Mobile customers with 4G LTE and the best devices. Also, the transaction returns significant value to Deutsche Telekom shareholders and allows us to retain exposure to the U.S. market.”

    As part of the transaction, Deutsche Telekom will receive an equity stake in AT&T that, based on the terms of the agreement, would give Deutsche Telekom an ownership interest in AT&T of approximately 8 percent. A Deutsche Telekom representative will join the AT&T Board of Directors.

    Competition and Pricing

    The U.S. wireless industry is one of the most fiercely competitive markets in the world and will remain so after this deal. The U.S. is one of the few countries in the world where a large majority of consumers can choose from five or more wireless providers in their local market. For example, in 18 of the top 20 U.S. local markets, there are five or more providers. Local market competition is escalating among larger carriers, low-cost carriers and several regional wireless players with nationwide service plans. This intense competition is only increasing with the build-out of new 4G networks and the emergence of new market entrants.

    The competitiveness of the market has directly benefited consumers. A 2010 report from the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) states the overall average price (adjusted for inflation) for wireless services declined 50 percent from 1999 to 2009, during a period which saw five major wireless mergers.

    Addresses wireless spectrum challenges facing AT&T, T-Mobile USA, their customers, and U.S. policymakers

    This transaction quickly provides the spectrum and network efficiencies necessary for AT&T to address impending spectrum exhaust in key markets driven by the exponential growth in mobile broadband traffic on its network. AT&T’s mobile data traffic grew 8,000 percent over the past four years and by 2015 it is expected to be eight to 10 times what it was in 2010. Put another way, all of the mobile traffic volume AT&T carried during 2010 is estimated to be carried in just the first six to seven weeks of 2015. Because AT&T has led the U.S. in smartphones, tablets and e-readers – and as a result, mobile broadband – it requires additional spectrum before new spectrum will become available. In the long term, the entire industry will need additional spectrum to address the explosive growth in demand for mobile broadband.

    Improves service quality for U.S. wireless customers

    AT&T and T-Mobile USA customers will see service improvements – including improved voice quality – as a result of additional spectrum, increased cell tower density and broader network infrastructure. At closing, AT&T will immediately gain cell sites equivalent to what would have taken on average five years to build without the transaction, and double that in some markets. The combination will increase AT&T’s network density by approximately 30 percent in some of its most populated areas, while avoiding the need to construct additional cell towers. This transaction will increase spectrum efficiency to increase capacity and output, which not only improves service, but is also the best way to ensure competitive prices and services in a market where demand is extremely high and spectrum is in short supply.

    Expands 4G LTE deployment to 95 percent of U.S. population – urban and rural areas

    This transaction will directly benefit an additional 46.5 million Americans – equivalent to the combined populations of the states of New York and Texas – who will, as a result of this combination, have access to AT&T’s latest 4G LTE technology. In terms of area covered, the transaction enables 4G LTE deployment to an additional 1.2 million square miles, equivalent to 4.5 times the size of the state of Texas. Rural and smaller communities will substantially benefit from the expansion of 4G LTE deployment, increasing the competitiveness of the businesses and entrepreneurs in these areas.

    Increases AT&T’s investment in the U.S.

    The acquisition will increase AT&T’s infrastructure investment in the U.S. by more than $8 billion over seven years. Expansion of AT&T’s 4G LTE network is an important foundation for the next wave of innovation and growth in mobile broadband, ensuring the U.S. continues to lead the world in wireless technology and availability. It makes T-Mobile USA, currently a German-owned U.S. telecom network, part of a U.S.-based company.

    An impressive, combined workforce

    Bringing AT&T and T-Mobile USA together will create an impressive workforce that is best positioned to compete in today’s global economy. Post-closing, AT&T intends to tap into the significant knowledge and expertise held by employees of both AT&T and T-Mobile USA to succeed. AT&T is the only major U.S. wireless company with a union workforce, offering leading wages, benefits, training and development for employees. The combined company will continue to have a strong employee and operations base in the Seattle area.

    Consistent with AT&T’s track record of value-enhancing acquisitions

    AT&T has a strong track record of executing value-enhancing acquisitions and expects to create substantial value for shareholders through large, straightforward synergies with a run rate of more than $3 billion, three years after closing onward (excluding integration costs). The value of the synergies is expected to exceed the purchase price of $39 billion. Revenue synergies come from opportunities to increase smartphone penetration and data average revenue per user, with cost savings coming from network efficiencies, subscriber and support savings, reduced churn and avoided capital and spectrum expenditures.

    The transaction will enhance margin potential and improve the company’s long-term revenue growth potential as it benefits from a more robust mobile broadband platform for new services.

    Additional financial information

    The $39 billion purchase price will include a cash payment of $25 billion with the balance to be paid using AT&T common stock, subject to adjustment. AT&T has the right to increase the cash portion of the purchase price by up to $4.2 billion with a corresponding reduction in the stock component, so long as Deutsche Telekom receives at least a 5 percent equity ownership interest in AT&T.

    The number of AT&T shares issued will be based on the AT&T share price during the 30-day period prior to closing, subject to a 7.5 percent collar; there is a one-year lock-up period during which Deutsche Telekom cannot sell shares.

    The cash portion of the purchase price will be financed with new debt and cash on AT&T’s balance sheet. AT&T has an 18-month commitment for a one-year unsecured bridge term facility underwritten by J.P. Morgan for $20 billion. AT&T assumes no debt from T-Mobile USA or Deutsche Telekom and continues to have a strong balance sheet.

    The transaction is expected to be earnings (excluding non-cash amortization and integration costs) accretive in the third year after closing. Pro-forma for 2010, this transaction increases AT&T’s total wireless revenues from $58.5 billion to nearly $80 billion, and increases the percentage of AT&T’s total revenues from wireless, wireline data and managed services to approximately 80 percent.

    This transaction will allow for sufficient cash flow to support AT&T’s dividend. AT&T has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years, a matter decided by AT&T’s Board of Directors.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    3 people like this.
  2. Gamer03

    Gamer03 Technology Aficionado
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,065
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    74
    Likes Received:
    249
    Location:
    The Florida Everglades
    My Phone:
    Motorola X Pure
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon Wireless
    I can't believe it. I never saw this coming. If this does get approval, then I eventually see Verizon wanting to acquire Sprint down the road since they will not want to get left behind.

    Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F191 Safari/6533.18.5
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002
    DoJ approval of either of these moves will probably take forever. If AT&T does indeed get the approval for T-Mobile, I don't believe you will ever see Verizon being allowed to purchase Sprint. If they did, that would create only 2 monster networks in the US, AT&T and Verizon. Prices would go sky high and competition would be nill.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    1 person likes this.
  4. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002

    Attached Files:

    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    1 person likes this.
  5. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    I think this should have happened a while back. The VZW/Altell acquasition created the difference between the 2 and gave VZW the edge. But if this is to take place, AT&T might finally be on an even par with spectrum comparison but we only hope that they do SE it all. I don't think this would have gone ahead if AT&T has not already discussed this take over with the FCC and DOJ. I just hope that AT&T hands over the customer service over to the T side and then may be we can have the best of both worlds.
     
  6. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002
    I don't see that happening. I predict that AT&T will make T-Mobile vanish, along with all unlimited plans, their good customer service, etc. This won't be pretty for T-Mobile employees.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. Jay2TheRescue

    Jay2TheRescue Resident Spamslayer
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    12,405
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    158
    Likes Received:
    438
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    My Phone:
    Pixel 4a 5G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&Tingular 310-410
    I don't know about Verizon buying Sprint. Sprint still hasn't successfully integrated its customers & networks from the Nextel merger. If Verizon took over Sprint, there would have to be some major changes on the Sprint/Nextel side. Maybe it would take a buyout from Verizon to finally bring it all together.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. Shizam76

    Shizam76 Shizam! Babyyyyy!
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,145
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    95
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Illinois
    My Phone:
    Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t
    Wow. The two companies that hated each other the most. Isn't the entire TMobile network basically an overlap onto at&t?
     
  9. Jay2TheRescue

    Jay2TheRescue Resident Spamslayer
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    12,405
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    158
    Likes Received:
    438
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    My Phone:
    Pixel 4a 5G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&Tingular 310-410
    I think that's the point. To increase sites and bandwidth.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. Shizam76

    Shizam76 Shizam! Babyyyyy!
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,145
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    95
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Illinois
    My Phone:
    Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t
    On the pole in my backyard, tmobile has panels and in the fall at&t put up panels. Will they take one of those sets down...leave them up?
     
  11. RadioRaiders

    RadioRaiders RF Black-Belt
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,074
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    464
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Wireless Provider(s):
    GSM / WCDMA /LTE
    Holy crap, is this for real? :eek: If it is, this is bad, very bad. There really needs to be more competition. As it is today, it's really only a 2-horse-race with VZW and ATT. But the smaller guys like T-Mob and Sprint weren't that far behind. If the 3rd and 4th place guys like T-Mob and Sprint get eaten, it's going to be really bad for consumers, because these are the companies that are driving prices down, creating competition, etc. If and when it becomes a duopoly between VZW and ATT then the game is pretty much over and consumers will really have to bend down and just take whatever the 2 giants put on the plate and offer them, because they'll have nothing else to chose from :(

    I really hope Sprint gets their act together and can pull up to the #3 spot with some good offerings. Or maybe see MetroPCS step up up as well. I hear they are being aggressive with LTE, but again, they are only in cities really.

    Actually, mergers are usually done to kill competition. I've seen alot of large networks merge, and usually something like 30-40% of the sites are redundant and get shut down. Don't know if that will be the case here or not. T-Mob focuses on city coverage, so AT&T may indeed be interested in the extra sites and bandwidth in these areas, especially in NY and Cali, since they are weak there currently.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. CRC

    CRC Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Hercules, CA.
    My Phone:
    Apple iPhone 6
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    OH-NO!!! This really sucks major doggy-doo-doo!! :mad: While spectrum wise it may be a good thing, and more hand-sets will be available, I foresee higher monthly fees. I'm not sure about customer service, for I've never dealt w/AT&T. But no more "Pink-T"!! :cryingaq:

    Any idea when the transition will happen? Couldn't read the article too well on my BB. Don't think I saw in the article it mentioning when.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #12 CRC, Mar 20, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2011
  13. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002
    Nothing will be happening for a least an entire year. Heck, AT&T is still finishing up the Centennial merger here in Michigan and the rest of the mid-west. AT&T is going to get a significant coverage boost in the NYC metro area, as t-mobile did a crazy good job building out filler sites recently.
    And Shizam76, as for your situation, don't expect a change on that tower for years. Even after the merger, it will take a long time to integrate the networks, and they might just leave it the way it is so they can put LTE up and have the room they need at the site. Who knows though.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    Maybe the end result will be less complaints about the network congestion which would result in less call to CS and the customer service could then relax a bit and we end up with better CS. In all honesty, I think AT&T's trouble was mostly as a result of the iphone and it took over a big chunk of the spectrum usage.But, like was said, for AT&T the big gain is in major markets and this would do an immediate improvement in the service and decrease the congestion. Now I don't think we will see a VZW/Sprint merger as this would for sure cause regulatory concerns, it would most likely be a merger between Sprint and another 2nd tier like Metro who is pushing hard to become a major and if these 2 join then we will see a third tier One company. Should this happen, then AT&T and VZW will care about the offerings of the third. We all know that the Sprint and T Mobile offerings did not cause VZW or AT&T from doing major changes but a stronger 3rd would for sure make them notice. In any manner, ultimately, like every where in the world all will end up with similar plans and the best will be based on overall service
     
  15. CRC

    CRC Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Hercules, CA.
    My Phone:
    Apple iPhone 6
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    I think the least that AT&T could do is make their AT&T world symbol "magenta"! :p
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  16. SteveW

    SteveW Battery mgmt is my life
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,095
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Cambridge, MA
    My Phone:
    T-Mo G2, LG CU500
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile

    It's interesting that they were careful in the press release to speak about the move to "4G LTE" and not 4G, since T-Mo has been advertising their "4G" heavily for months.


    SteveW
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #16 SteveW, Mar 20, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2011
  17. SteveW

    SteveW Battery mgmt is my life
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,095
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Cambridge, MA
    My Phone:
    T-Mo G2, LG CU500
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    Well their competitive marketing will certainly change. I guess Carly Foulkes' gig is over. She'll be fine, I'm sure. ;)




    SteveW
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  18. TWX

    TWX Mobile Enthusiast
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,184
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    8
    Likes Received:
    117
    Location:
    Rogers City, Michigan
    My Phone:
    iPhone 5s
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Wow. Dumb question, why is Michigan estimated to get a massive boost like that? T-Mobile doesn't provide service here at all in northern Michigan, so why can they now basically cover the entire state?
     
  19. josephd

    josephd Tomorrow is another day.
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,293
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    144
    Location:
    MA.
    My Phone:
    White iPhone 5C 16GB
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    The way I see it, I am in contract with VZW for one more year. I am also with VZW because my AT&T service went south when I moved, T-Mobile is not much better either. So aside of hurting competition, the acquisition does not affect me. And besides, VZW so far has been working well for me here.

    BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.973 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105
     
  20. Yankees368

    Yankees368 Compulsive Signal Checker
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,366
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    876
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    NYC
    My Phone:
    iPhones 4S???
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon, Sprint 2002-2010, Voicestream 2001-2002
    AT&T probably did not have enough spectrum to provide LTE in those area previously (even though I believe those are areas that Verizon had to divest to them) and that gaining t-mobile spectrum will allow them to do so.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    1 person likes this.
  21. TWX

    TWX Mobile Enthusiast
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,184
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    8
    Likes Received:
    117
    Location:
    Rogers City, Michigan
    My Phone:
    iPhone 5s
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Ah ok. Well, that's good for people around who only had Verizon as an option for 3G/4G mainly. :)
     
  22. josephd

    josephd Tomorrow is another day.
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,293
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    144
    Location:
    MA.
    My Phone:
    White iPhone 5C 16GB
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon
    I was involved with AT&T Wireless when the aquisition with Cingular and than AT&T happened. There was also a lot of unnecessary panic back then.
    All I noticed was the signs being changed and some stores closing. Maybe it was luck, but I did not see a hiccup in my service. If anything T-Mobile's customers should see an improvement in their service.

    BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.973 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105
     
  23. Jay2TheRescue

    Jay2TheRescue Resident Spamslayer
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    12,405
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    158
    Likes Received:
    438
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    My Phone:
    Pixel 4a 5G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&Tingular 310-410
    Same here. When Cingular acquired ATTW I noticed nothing but increased coverage.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  24. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    Coverage maps:

    [​IMG]

    cant seem to be able to get the T Mobile mapin here so please clcik on the link T-Mobile Coverage
     
  25. M in LA

    M in LA Mobile 28 Years Plus
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    347
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Phone:
    iPhone 13 Pro Max, XS Max
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon (since 1994)
    I could care less which carrier is #1. This is awful news. Down to ONE major GSM carrier.

    I wonder if this will get past regulators and how much will AT&T have to divest? I came across this news via the Google News widget on my phone and couldn't believe what I saw. A few people I told the news to were shocked (not that this really matters in the scheme of things with what's going on in Japan).

    Bad news all around and I hope it fails. If Verizon tries this :censored: with Sprint, I hope that dies a horrible death too.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    1 person likes this.
  26. tmobileman

    tmobileman Iphone Hater
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    At my house
    My Phone:
    G1v1.5, Dash, Touch Pro 2
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Tmobile
    interesting day at work today...I am in shock and worried for my job, who knows what will happen next.
     
  27. charlyee

    charlyee Ultimate Insanity
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    9,906
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1,586
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    My Phone:
    iPhone X
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t/Airtel/Turkcell
    Hope everything will go well for you. :)

    Here is some discussions on the regulatory hurdles facing this deal:

    March 20, 2011 6:02 PM PDT
    AT&T-T-Mobile USA deal may face regulatory hurdles
    by Marguerite Reardon



    From a network and technology perspective, the $39 billion marriage between AT&T and T-Mobile USA is a no-brainer, but the companies may have to do some smooth talking to get the deal approved by regulators.

    AT&T and T-Mobile USA, which is owned by German phone company Deutsche Telekom, each use the GSM technology and each company plans to deploy the 4G technology known as LTE in the future. AT&T plans to launch its LTE network this summer, and T-Mobile has said in the past that LTE is on its roadmap.

    Currently, each company has been upgrading its network to the latest version of 3G wireless technology called HSPA+. (T-Mobile stirred up controversy last summer when it began marketing the HSPA+ network as 4G. AT&T, which initially criticized T-Mobile for this, began calling its own HSPA+ network 4G earlier this year.)

    The technology synergies between T-Mobile and AT&T are stark contrast to how T-Mobile lined up with Sprint Nextel, which had been rumored to be eying T-Mobile for more than two years. Sprint uses a different network technology called CDMA, which is the same technology that Verizon Wireless uses. What's more Sprint is using WiMax for its next generation wireless network.

    While regulators would have been much more eager to see No. 3 Sprint Nextel merge with No. 4 T-Mobile so that they could take on No. 1 Verizon Wireless and No. 2 AT&T, the reality is that such a scenario would have been an integration nightmare for Sprint. Sprint is still struggling to make sense of its 2005 acquisition of Nextel, which also used a completely different technology.

    "There's no question that AT&T and T-Mobile are a very good fit from a technology standpoint," said Charles Golvin, an analyst with Forrester Research. "A Sprint-T-Mobile deal would have given these companies scale, but it made sense from an integration standpoint."
    But even though the deal makes sense from a technology standpoint, it won't necessarily be smooth sailing. For one, regulators are likely to scrutinize this deal closely. And secondly, even though AT&T and T-Mobile use the same technology, they use different wireless spectrum bands to deliver their services. This means that AT&T will have to move T-Mobile's customers to different spectrum bands in order to integrate the networks.

    Regulatory scrutiny

    First let's look at the regulatory picture. The biggest issue for the FCC and for the Department of Justice, which also needs to approve this merger, is whether a merger between these companies would concentrate too much power in the hands of a single company, which could affect pricing and services for consumers. T-Mobile has always been a price leader. It's safe to say that AT&T will likely not adopt T-Mobile pricing, which means that consumers will be losing a more affordable player in the wireless market.

    And the reason is simple. It won't need to. AT&T and Verizon Wireless already control more than 40 percent of the existing wireless market. And T-Mobile, the smallest of the major wireless operators, would concentrate AT&T's market power further. A combined AT&T and T-Mobile would have nearly 130 million subscribers, which is a third more than Verizon Wireless, the No. 1 nationwide player in the country. The new AT&T-T-Mobile would also have twice as many customers as No. 3. Sprint Nextel.

    The FCC has already expressed concern over the competitive landscape in wireless. In May the FCC warned that the industry is getting too concentrated. In its report, the agency said that since 2003, market concentration in wireless has increased 32 percent. The report indicates that 60 percent of the nation's subscribers and revenue come from the country's two largest wireless providers: AT&T and Verizon Wireless. The FCC noted that these companies are continuing to gain customers as other national operators, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile USA, have been losing subscribers.

    So far the FCC hasn't issued a statement regarding the proposed AT&T-T-Mobile merger. But insiders at the agency have said previously that they would be more concerned with an acquisition between AT&T and Verizon Wireless and either Sprint Nextel or T-Mobile USA than a merger involving Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile.


    Read more: AT&T-T-Mobile USA deal may face regulatory hurdles | Signal Strength - CNET News
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  28. charlyee

    charlyee Ultimate Insanity
    Super Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    9,906
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1,586
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    My Phone:
    iPhone X
    Wireless Provider(s):
    at&t/Airtel/Turkcell
    Here is T-Mobile's coverage map:

    [​IMG]


    On a personal basis, it will not make much difference, I am in a strong at&t area with poor to none T-Mobile coverage. However, I do not like the idea of only one GSM provider, so at&t can basically make up their owns rules. They do so even now, for example Big Blue is the only provider that does not allow side loading of apps on Androids.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  29. TWX

    TWX Mobile Enthusiast
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,184
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    8
    Likes Received:
    117
    Location:
    Rogers City, Michigan
    My Phone:
    iPhone 5s
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Here's T-Mobile's native GSM 1900 coverage area w/o roaming partners. Keep in mind that mostly all of this is upgraded to HSPA+

    *Map from Mobile World Live
     

    Attached Files:

  30. hf1khal

    hf1khal Who am I to judge
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,269
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    1
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Ashburn VA
    My Phone:
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    looking at these 2 maps one can see that T mobile has the spectrum that AT&T in the major cities. the rest look like they will compliment the lower coverage areas for AT&T. So here I see the purchase of Altell by VZW places AT&T's proposed purchase on an equal footing and will probably result in the sale of a small amount of assets for it to gain final approval. My bet is that AT&T has already counted for this and will include it in its application process.
     

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice