Research firm feels W-CDMA will take over CDMA Markets in some countries Dell’Oro: W-CDMA set to stomp into CDMA market W-CDMA technology will enjoy “exceptional” growth over the next several years, according to research firm Dell’Oro Group, expansion that will come at the expense of CDMA technology. “While growth in W-CDMA remains tepid in the short term, we remain confident in its longer-term growth and potential to slowly displace GSM, because of the large percentage of mobile service providers that have committed to W-CDMA technology and the expectation of increased subscriber adoption as handset prices drop in the future,” said Greg Collins, vice president of mobile infrastructure research at Dell’Oro. Dell’Oro’s report predicts that W-CDMA technology will capture “meaningful market share” from CDMA as carriers in key growth areas such as India, Brazil and Korea migrate their subscriber bases to GSM or W-CDMA-based services. News of the worldwide move from CDMA to W-CDMA first surfaced last year, when several CDMA carriers across the globe indicated they were eying GSM and W-CDMA technology. CDMA proponents sought to refute reports on the issue, citing a separate list of carriers they said were moving from GSM to CDMA. CDMA pioneer Qualcomm Inc. also sought to downplay the situation, pointing to its strong chipset and intellectual property position in W-CDMA. Dell’Oro’s prediction of a shift from CDMA to W-CDMA over the next several years lends additional weight to concerns over the future of the CDMA market. Aside from the W-CDMA vs. CDMA battle, Dell’Oro’s report also touched on the market for WiMAX technology, a nascent but much-hyped portion of the global infrastructure industry. Dell’Oro predicts that revenues in the worldwide mobile infrastructure equipment market will grow steadily over the next five years, and that WiMAX equipment sales will help push revenues along starting next year. “We expect the mobile WiMAX market to grow by a compounded annual growth rate exceeding of 50 percent through 2011,” said Collins. “Despite this strong growth, we predict WiMAX will account for less than 10 percent of the mobile infrastructure market in 2011 because of the lack of voice services available in the short term.” http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070131/FREE/70131007/1008/FREE
http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/01/HNwimaxheldback_1.html Report on mobile market predicts GSM will continue to dominate over the next five years By Stephen Lawson, IDG News Service February 01, 2007 The GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) family of technologies will continue to dominate the mobile infrastructure business over the next five years, a research company said Wednesday. Sales of network gear for WiMax, the hot new mobile broadband system, will grow by an average of 50 percent per year until 2011 but still only make up about 5 percent of the market worldwide, according to Dell'Oro Group. Meanwhile, versions of WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access) will grab share away from rival EV-DO (Evolution-Data Optimized) technologies as mobile operators build their networks, said Dell'Oro analyst Greg Collins. The Redwood City, California, company on Wednesday announced a report on the mobile infrastructure market from 2006 to 2011. Backers of mobile WiMax have painted a bright future for the emerging technology, which is based on the IEEE 802.16e standard and designed to deliver multiple megabits per second over a range of miles (1 mile = 1.6 km). Collins didn't label WiMax a loser but said it will get off the ground slowly because it's an underdog when it comes to carrying voice calls. Emerging WCDMA and EVDO technologies have closer ties to the cellular world and will be better equipped to handle calls over the next few years, Collins believes, so most users will hang onto them. Dell'Oro forecast 2011 revenue of about $2 billion for WiMax network infrastructure that serves end users. Gear for other purposes, such as mobile operators' wireless "backhaul" links to cell towers, wasn't included. Broad adoption of WiMax will drive down its cost, further accelerating the rollout, according to Intel and other WiMax supporters. Dell'Oro's forecast growth rate could impede the technology's progress toward attractive consumer prices, Collins said, although it does share some features with other emerging wireless systems. The emergence of WiMax will be a sideshow to growing dominance of WCDMA technologies in the cellular world, according to Dell'Oro's forecast. Most of the world's mobile operators have grown up on GSM and are upgrading to WCDMA technologies, including the upcoming HSUPA (high-speed uplink packet access) and LTE (Long-Term Evolution) systems. The competing CDMA technology, with its own upcoming versions, has had strongholds in the U.S. and South Korea and been adopted in some other countries. Some CDMA carriers in developing countries, such as India and Brazil, are now migrating toward the WCDMA path, Collins said. Among other things, they want to serve travelers from other countries, most of which use WCDMA, to earn lucrative roaming charges, he said. Even in South Korea, some operators are looking away from CDMA because they are worried about support for future development of a minority technology, Collins said. CDMA's 3G technologies made up 20 percent of spending on mobile infrastructure in 2006 but will represent only about 13 percent in 2011, according to Dell'Oro. One reason WCDMA takes up such a large share of infrastructure revenue is that it's more expensive to upgrade to those technologies, said James Person, chief operating officer of the CDMA Development Group, which represents vendors and operators using CDMA. This is true, but CDMA's global footprint among mobile operators still is shrinking, Collins said.
I'll never understand all this cheerleading for/against CDMA or GSM. The viable existience of both is what helps to drive innovation. What, you want CDMA to just go away? That will really help progress. What I want are single devices that are fully compatible and functional with either platform. Now THAT's what I would call global roaming capability.
TKR, I agree completely! WHO CARES if the other countries are going W-CDMA from CDMA? Verizon and Sprint aren't changing. All this CDMA/GSM crap is getting really OLD!!!
I agree with both of you, I think both the CDMA & GSM companies like bashing each other. And yes a GSM/CDMA dual mode phone would be neat to see come out, I just don't think it would be easy to sell, since any carrier with both technologies would fight over the rights to the phone. I just post the articles on these subjects for information purpose only on how bad the CDMA/GSM battles can get & if it's a problem, I will stop posting them.
It is completely alright to post them Fire14. It's others......not that I am a moderator or anything....
Fire, my comments were not directed at you. It was more about the idiocy of the GSM/CDMA war that drives me nuts. I appreciate the things you post. I learn more from the Wireless News forum than anyplace else on WA. Keep up the posts. There are a few posters on this site who LOVE to post anything about GSM taking over the world. It's their choice to post it, and my choice to express my opinions on it. That's what I love about this site.
Sprint Expanding Nextel's IDEN Coverage and Deploying WIMAX means CDMA future is Questionable. Yes, that is GSM for Now and How Long GSM will Last Depends on the 690 GSM Carriers around the Globe.
Diversity and substitution are two wonderful things to have in any market... ultimately better for the consumer in the long run.
Wars are idiotic in general, no argument there. As someone who may've said a few times that I'd like to see everyone use GSM I need to explain myself -- I don't really care whether it's GSM technology or CDMA technology, all I care about is not being limited in phone choices to those offered by the carriers. On a GSM carrier all I have to do is buy the phone I like that supports the US frequencies, stick my SIM in it and use it. Call me spoiled, I won't argue with that
I don't really care about the debate; I just go with what works for me. Usually, it's the carriers with their heavy handed tactics that drives me crazy