Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Join Now

Council concludes planned Verizon transmitter poses no health risk to residents

Discussion in 'Western US Wireless Forum' started by dglively, Jul 28, 2004.

  1. dglively

    dglively Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sonoma County, CA
    My Phone:
    LG VX6000 (his)
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Verizon; Formerly-AT&T TDMA
    In your face NIMBY's!


    RP rejects appeal of park cell tower

    Council concludes planned Verizon transmitter poses no health risk to residents
    July 28, 2004

    By CLARK MASON
    THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

    Convinced that a cell phone antenna poses no hazard, the Rohnert Park City Council on Tuesday rejected an appeal by residents intent on keeping one out of their neighborhood park.

    Full Story:

    http://www.pressdemocrat.com/local/news/28celltower_b3b03_empempireb.html
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #1 dglively, Jul 28, 2004
  2. Rich

    Rich Bronze Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2001
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    New Port Richey, FL
    My Phone:
    BlackBerry® Style™ 9670 s
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Sprint- AT&t
    nice :)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #2 Rich, Jul 28, 2004
  3. Gman

    Gman Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    476
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego
    My Phone:
    Epic 4G
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Sprint
    Well the interesting thing is that they cannot include health arguments in their approval process. If it meets the FCC's requirements that is all they can consider per the FCC. Often they seem to wiggle around the topic by saying the tower is not fitting for it's surroundings but in actuality they are trying not to piss off their citizens who have the health concerns/paranoia.

    G.
     
    #3 Gman, Jul 29, 2004
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice