Bush frustration sparks expletive Monday, July 17, 2006 Posted: 1256 GMT (2056 HKT) ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (CNN) -- U.S. President George W. Bush expressed frustration Monday at attempts to get U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan to do more to end the conflict in Lebanon. In the conversation, Bush also says he plans to send U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to the Middle East. During a photo opportunity where there was an open microphone, Bush was heard expressing his frustration to British Prime Minister Tony Blair using an expletive. Bush and Blair were aware that the event was a photo opportunity and that the media was present. Blair later turned off the microphone. Earlier in the day, Blair and Annan called for the deployment of an international force in southern Lebanon, in order to end the spiraling conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. The text of their conversation is as follows: Bush: What about Kofi Annan? I don't like the sequence of it. His attitude is basically cease-fire and everything else happens. Blair: I think the thing that is really difficult is you can't stop this unless you get this international presence agreed. Bush: She's going. I think Condi's (U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice) going to go pretty soon. Blair: Well that's all that matters. If you see, it will take some time to get out of there. But at least it gives people.... Bush: It's a process I agree. I told her your offer too. Blair: Well it's only or if she's gonna or if she needs the ground prepared as it were. See, if she goes out she's got to succeed as it were, where as I can just go out and talk. Bush: See the irony is what they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this ____ and it's over. Blair: Cause I think this is all part of the same thing. What does he think? He thinks if Lebanon turns out fine, if he gets a solution in Israel and Palestine, Iraq goes in the right way, he's done it. That's what this whole things about. It's the same with Iran. Bush: I feel like telling Kofi to get on the phone with Assad and make something happen. We're not blaming Israel and we're not blaming the Lebanese government. Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/07/17/russia.g8.bushexpletive/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our beloved president has done it again, he was caught by a live mic cussing without realizing that he was being heard . It's reminiscent of the remark he made to Cheney during the 2000 election campaign. The Republican presidential candidate George W Bush has said he regrets the fact that people heard him make an insulting comment about a journalist, but he refused to apologise. Just before a campaign speech in Illinois, Mr Bush said to his running mate Dick Cheney: "There's Adam Clymer, major league _______ from the New York Times." Mr Bush later said he did not realise that live microphones were going to pick up the remark, but he stopped short of an actual apology. A BBC correspondent says that the Texas governor appeared shaken by the gaffe, which came as he started the final phase of campaigning for November's election. Not the first time Asked if "calling people names" was part of the campaign, Mr Cheney said: "The governor made a private comment to me." Mr Bush has been unhappy with several articles by Mr Clymer which were critical of his record. In response Mr Clymer said: "I'm disappointed in the governor's language." The BBC Washington correspondent, Philippa Thomas, says that the incident is every politician's nightmare and it has happened to the Texas governor before. On the campaign trail on Tuesday, Mr Bush returned to his normal agenda, delivering a speech about making medical benefits more widely available. Democrats' delight But the Gore campaign was quick to seize on Mr Bush's mistake, with a spokesman declaring that the Democrats had high regard for journalists. "We hold virtually all members of the Fourth Estate in the highest regard and we believe they should be part of the democratic process day in and day out," Democratic spokesman Chris Lehane said. "It's the second time in less than a week that the governor has broken his promise to 'change the tone' of the campaign. "First, he used an ad to attack the vice-president in a very nasty and personal way, now he's used an expletive to attack a member of the working press," added Mr Lehane. Bushisms from the past: "There's Adam Clymer, major league _______ from the New York Times" "I understand small-business growth - I was one" "Keep good relations with the Grecians" Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/910614.stm Further info: http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bushcuss.asp --------------------------------------------------------------------------
My favorite was when Reagan said that he had just signed a bill outlawing Russia... The bombing begins in 5 minutes... -Jay
And to think if Allen Funt was still alive to do a special called Geroge W. Bush Candid Microphone what thing we would hear :rotfl: :loony:
Yeah they happen all right but how often do you see a video with two world leaders talking informally and so strongly about such a crisis? That video also shows how good Bush' manners are....beginning by talking with his mouth full.
Table manner criticisms aside, note that nothing said was in contrast to anything he has said publicly, nor do I disagree with his sentiment. Therefore, no story, IMO. But of course the media wants to make a big deal of it because he said a slang word in assumed privacy.
Don't want to go into too many bloopers, but I am sure he learned it when Geroge H.W. Bush got sick and threw-up on the prime minister of Japan during a dinner in 1991 . Or in 2003 when General Clark was running for President and said privately to someone that he was going to kick the out of someone and a mic caught his voice.
It's definitely not a big deal since we all cuss at some point, it's just unusual to see this side of a politician who normally controls the media at a press conference since he/she normally is prepared for what questions will be asked of him/her. Here's the BBC's take on it, they quoted Bush's sentence: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/3681938.stm
I have plenty of issues with GW, but him saying "sh*t" isn't one of them. It says more about the media than about the presidency, as wirles said. In deference to the rules of the forum, I'll refrain from commenting on your assertion that this president is "prepared" for questions.
Not very often do world leaders say things like this indeed this is true but it is not my place to judge. If it was me I would have done the same thing lol.
The link doesn't take you to the right place, but seeing as it is the BBC, I am sure it is the usual Anti-American rhetoric with a full dose of BBC UK Snobbery towards Yanks. Their MO doesn't change. They can be a decent source of news...as long as it doesn't involve something about the US.
Big fing deal. Oh no, the president used a curse word! Billions of virgin ears were assaulted by the word "s__t"! I have lots of issues with Our Beloved Orangutan but his use of swearwords isn't one of them.
I can't say I find the BBC to be terribly biased when it comes to America. No news source is 100% unbiased, human nature gets in the way, but from what I can see the BBC does a relatively good job of being as objective as possible. Certainly if one compares the BBC with a news organisation such as FOX News one can see a very clear difference in both reporting styles and objectivity. What you will find is that many British media sources run stories that are critical of various foriegn countries/governments (as well as Britain itself), not just the United States. As for 'UK snobbery' towards Yanks I wonder if perhaps you have misunderstood the British mindset. The United Kingdom is a series of islands and the people who live on these islands tend to have an island mentality when it comes to foriegn matters. Of course there are national stereotypes of Americans in the British media, just as there are stereotypes of the French or Germans, it really isn't exclusive to Americans. The reason many Britons are sometimes critical of the US is arguably similar to the reason why so many are sometimes critical of the EU; Britons tend not to like the idea of foriegners deciding or influencing British affairs.
I tend to agree with scotsboyuk. What many perceive as bias I attribute to a news organization reflecting the conventional perspective in their culture. Most days I at least glance at the BBC News Web page, along with my dose of CNN's page. I also listen to quite a bit of BBC Radio news. I may disagree with their perspective (on the Middle East, for example), but I don't really question their overall commitment to basic factual reporting. Like other traditional news outlets, but unlike Fox, the BBC does try to explicitly distinguish between factual reporting, opinion, and a given reporter's observations. If I want another perspective I can click and read the Jerusalem Post, or Al-Ahram (Cairo), for that matter. I love the Web!
Of course, as well as about a million other sites in the blogosphere. Reminds me of the title of a book by the late David Brinkley "Everyone Is Entitled to My Opinion"