Welcome to Our WirelessAdvisor Community!

You are viewing our forums as a GUEST. Please join us so you can post and view all the pictures.
Registration is easy, fast and FREE!

Barely a Sprint signal on Kennesaw Mountain

Discussion in 'Southern US Wireless Forum' started by TKR, Mar 12, 2005.

  1. TKR

    TKR Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    This is a technical question of sorts.

    In Marietta, Georgia, if you go up to the top of Kennesaw Mountain, which is big hill that stand alone about 700 feet or so above local terrain, you barely pick up a sprint signal at the top. You begin to lose signal about half way up. This is despite the fact that there are plenty of towers in all directions of the mountiain, from 1-3 miles away.

    Why is it that it is hard for the phone to hold a signal?

    Is it that the antenna panels are not aimed up to pick up the slight angle of the elevation? They are not THAT directionally sensitive are they?

    Or is it that the phone begins to pick up too many PN offsets and can't handle it all? If so, is this a unique CDMA weakness (too many towers in range)?

    We found a Cingular phone a couple of years ago at the top (probably TDMA), and it had a booming signal, so we were easily able to notify the owner using their own phone.
     
  2. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
    It might be that the towers are not aimed right for you to pick up a signal there, but usually 700 feet don't matter.
    I guess it's pilot pollution then. I've been on top of a lot of mountains with my CDMA phone(Verizon) and never experienced pilot pollution problems, even though my phone was able to 'see' tons of towers.
     
  3. chris4434

    chris4434 Junior Member
    Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    georgia
    My Phone:
    Motorola RAZR D&G Gold
    Wireless Provider(s):
    Cingular, Sprint PCS (cancelled), T-Mobile
    I have noticed the same problem. It seems like the signal is very poor at the parking lot on the top of the mountain, but once you walk to the actual top the signal becomes strong again. When I was hiking on it my phone kept going from sprint to digital roam to analog roam to no signal.
     
  4. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
    Any pictures of the mountain/area?
     
  5. roamer1

    roamer1 In Memoriam
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,749
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sandy Springs, GA
    My Phone:
    Palm Treo 680
    Wireless Provider(s):
    lots of orange, a little Little Rock blue
    a) the panels on the nearby sites are tilted downward
    b) as SPCS is CDMA, you're probably have issues with pilot pollution -- basically, being able to see too many sites from the top of the mountain.

    These sort of issues also exist on the tops of other mountains around Atlanta and north GA, including Stone Mountain (where even VZW CDMA "poops out" and drops to AMPS at the top while non-CDMA carriers generally work fine), Fort Mountain between Chatsworth and Ellijay, etc.

    In Chattanooga, which is basically surrounded by mountains, carriers generally avoid the problem by having sites atop Lookout, Signal, White Oak, etc. mountains -- something that's impossible to do in state or national parks or forests, hence the issues at Kennesaw Mountain, Stone Mountain, etc.

    -SC
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. TKR

    TKR Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    I don't pretend to understand how CDMA communication strings actually work with PN offsets, etc. But this type of situation can't be that uncommon a problem. I wonder shouldn't it be possible to deploy a prioritization algorithem in CDMA for this type of situation so that the phone basically tells the network it is getting too much noise and it need to "pick" a tower? Is anything like that possible?
     
  7. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    TKR,

    I couldn't agree with you more. And you're right it is a very common problem. You would think by now the CDMA technology would have evolved to help reduce or eliminate the PN offsets that are weak or unusuable but it hasn't. Like roamer1 said it's definetly the old pilot pollution thing when your phone sees too many stray signals at the same time and doesn't know which one to pick. Even though the panels are typically tilted downward a tiny amount of signal will propogate upward. Very seldom are panels aimed upward towards hills but I have seen it.
     
  8. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
    I've seen panels tilted upward, and there was no mountain or tall building to cover.
     
  9. TKR

    TKR Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T

    This particular setting does not present THAT much of an up angle, anway.
     
  10. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
    So I guess the thing to do *if*Sprint wanted to provide reliable service up there would be to add something like a microcell or very weak cellsite that doesn't cover much surroundings(and spill down,creating problems off the mountain). Just for arguments sake.
    Now, a GSM carrier wouldn't have to do this, correct, since a GSM phone can still 'see' through all those offsets and lock onto one single offset, correct?
     
  11. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    I have as well. *shrug*
     
  12. larry

    larry Sprint loyalist and former mod
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2001
    Messages:
    13,723
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    165
    Likes Received:
    56
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    My Phone:
    Galaxy S22+
    Wireless Provider(s):
    T-Mobile
    I believe that GSM has similar problems in situations like this that's caused by a different issue. Maybe someone else can explain it better.
     
  13. Andy

    Andy Diamond Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    10,281
    Cell Tower Picture Gallery:
    130
    Likes Received:
    7
    My Phone:
    HTC Thunderbolt
    Wireless Provider(s):
    VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile

    I didn't know that was the case. I will do some resarch and post it here if I find anything.
     
  14. TKR

    TKR Senior Member
    Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wireless Provider(s):
    AT&T
    Well, I went up to the summit yesterday with my new 2300 (which can digitally roam and also has a better service screen than my old 4900).

    I put the phone in both Sprint and Verizon roaming modes. Both providers suffered from very weak signal bars. However, VZW was getting about -75dB and Sprint about -85 dB, so there was no lack of overall signal. However, the Ec/Io reading for both were typically between -15 and -25 dB, or worse. That means a lot of noise, so the issue would seem to be pilot pollution.

    It would be nice if they could come up with a CDMA filtering/proccessing algorithem to allow better functionality in such "noisy" signal environments.
     

Share This Page

Copyright 1997-2023 Wireless Advisor™, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice