I'm surprised that it took Android this long to pass Apple, given the fact that Android has more than one device available, and they are sold on all of the leading wireless carriers, compared to the Apple iPhone which is only being sold through AT&T.…… Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16
I think part of it is just consumer education learning about Android. Apple has been producing electronics for decades, including the iPod for I think 6 years before the iPhone came out. They had a built-in user base wanting to get their product.
It didn't really take that long. Android was only on T-Mobile until last October when Verizon released the Droid and shortly thereafter, the Eris. Sprint followed with two devices in November. AT&T didn't get their first Android device until late in the first quarter...much too late to make a meaningful impact in Android's 1st quarter numbers. So in about 4.5 months of wide realease, Android shot past the iPhone. Maybe this will spur Apple to make their phone available to more carriers in the U.S. sooner than they had originally planned?
Talk about divergent paths: Apple iPhone - 1 carrier, 2 phone versions. Android - 4 carriers (so far), many phones (with more on the way). I'm glad Android has become a parallel to Apple versus trying to play catch-up and becoming a clone. The more divergence, the better, IMO.
Nope. Not going to happen till 2012. If the deal that was made between AT&T, and Apple stands. http://stadium.weblogsinc.com/engadget/files/Apple_iPhone_Ex_brief.pdf
Apple questions Android smartphone surge : Apple Inc on Tuesday questioned recent data showing smartphones using Google's Android operating system surpassing iPhone sales in the United States, and said there are no signs that the competition is gaining in the smartphone market. ADVERTISEMENT Smartphones using Android accounted for 28 percent of U.S. unit sales in the first quarter, ahead of Apple at 21 percent, research group NPD said on Monday. Research in Motion Ltd was No. 1 at 36 percent, NPD said. Apple said the NPD data didn't provide a complete picture. "This is a very limited report on 150,000 U.S. consumers responding to an online survey and does not account for the more than 85 million iPhone and iPod touch customers worldwide," said Apple spokeswoman Natalie Harrison. She said the iPhone far outsells Android on a worldwide basis, and pointed to a report from IDC last week which showed the iPhone with a 16.1 percent global market share, behind No. 2 RIM and No. 1 Nokia Oyj. "We had a record quarter with iPhone sales growing by 131 percent and with our new iPhone OS 4.0 software coming this summer, we see no signs of the competition catching up any time soon," Harrison said. Apple has sold more than 51 million iPhones since it started selling the device in 2007. Apple questions Android smartphone surge - Yahoo! Canada News
Re: Apple questions Android smartphone surge : So Apple is quoting their worldwide numbers to counter a study aimed at U.S. customers. A typical tactic of a company that is trying to confuse people. And for the record, I have nothing against Apple...I like my Mac more than any PC I have owned. I own an iPod touch, which is better than any iPhone (IMO) since there is no AT&T involved.
Re: Apple questions Android smartphone surge : If they are going to do a study in which Apple put up against multiple Android devices that are being sold to multiple carriers, then I think it's important to look at ALL the numbers. Like you said, the Apple iPhone is currently only being sold through AT&T here in the US, yet the numbers that were given, included all of Android's devices that are sold on all 4 of the wireless networks. It doesn't seem like a fair study to me given this fact. And I'm not just saying this because I happen to own and use the iPhone 3GS on AT&T's network. :wink: Data on the iPod touch can only work while using a WiFi connection, so saying that it is better than the iPhone, which gets a continuous data flow is nothing more than a joke.
Re: Apple questions Android smartphone surge : Apple chose to seek out a single carrier. No one forced them into that model. Apple chose a closed system, Google chose open. Nothing wrong with either one, but you can't reasonably compare iPhone sales worldwide to Android sales domestically, nor can you claim domestic comparisons are unfair when it is entirely because of Apple that only one carrier sells their device here. I have no doubt that if the iPhone was sold on all 4 major carriers there would be more iPhone than Android (and BlackBerry) users in this country, but that isn't the case. As to WiFI vs. AT&T data, the iPhone gets no more data than the touch if AT&T doesn't work well where you live and work.
Re: Apple questions Android smartphone surge : Finally, we have come to something that we can both agree on. However, as an iPhone owner, I would expect that Apple's iPhone sales would be down in Q1, as a lot of customers hold off on purchasing one while they await the 4th generation iPhone. Obviously the iPhone is working for those that are on AT&T's network, either on EDGE, or 3G, or it would not continue to sell as good as it has been. My iPhone with AT&T gets a full 3G signal at home and at work for me, so I'm happy with it.
Re: Apple questions Android smartphone surge : Q1 is typically a down quarter for everyone, though the prospect of a new iPhone might reduce their sales even more than normal.
I think it's only a matter of time before Android becomes the #1 OS simply because it's on a variety of different phones (and most of them are nice ones too). HTC and Motorola are pretty much building all their new smartphones around Android, and SonyEricsson, Samsung, LG and others are also getting Android devices out there too. Nokia is sticking to Symbian, mainly because they have to after all the millions of $'s they dumped into it. As for the metrics, you can have a look here, on p.9 it shows Android passing Apple in OS share, but Apple having more device share (huh? ) Admob takes statistics about phones that hit websites with Admob on them, and Admob is owned by Google, so not sure how that factors in. Anyway, metrics will always be disputed, but I think there's no disputing Android is rising quick :browani: