Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33

AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

NY Times: AT&T Said to Seek Verizon Wireless Assets - DealBook Blog - NYTimes.com...

  1. #1
    JFB
    JFB is in the house!
    Administrator JFB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1998
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,453
    Phone(s)
    HTC Amaze 4G
    Provider(s)
    T-Mobile
    Devices
    iPod Nano 16GB, Sirius Starmate Replay
    Likes
    388
    Images
    7

    News AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Last edited by JFB; 02-04-2009 at 7:29 PM.
    Joe

    Are you new to WA?

    Introduce yourself in our Welcome Forum!

  2. #2


    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Kingsport, TN
    Posts
    6,306
    Phone(s)
    iPhone 5
    Provider(s)
    T-Mobile
    Likes
    53

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    I actually hope AT&Ticon or T-Mobileicon end up with the divested Alltel markets in Virginia. There is little to any GSM coverage in those areas up for divesture in SW VA.

  3. #3
    THE (Samsung) Beast Quint101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    3,696
    Phone(s)
    Samsung Galaxy Note 3
    Nokia Lumia 521
    Samsung Gusto 2
    Provider(s)
    VZW, T-Mobile
    Devices
    Nexus 7
    Likes
    443
    Images
    48

    Default

    Wirelessly posted (Q's Mobile: BlackBerry8130/4.5.0.77 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

    Are the private equity partners fronts for some of the smaller wireless carriers like USCellular?
    Follow me here.

    Reluctantly proud Verizon Wireless user since 2005.

    GO BRAVES!!!!!!

    Contract Cellular history: Verizon: 2005 to present, Sprint 2001 - 2003
    Prepaid history: Alltel/Verizon 2005 to present; T-Mobile: Off and on since 1999; AT&T 2003 - 2005

  4. #4
    Go Lakers! larry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    13,715
    Phone(s)
    LG Optimus G
    Provider(s)
    Sprint
    Likes
    45
    Images
    166

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Critics, including consumer advocates and Verizonicon’s smaller competitors, believe such a deal — allowing one giant telecom provider to transfer customers to another — would not be in the interest of consumers, according to the paper.

    I agree with this. It's too bad the two giants keep getting bigger while everyone else gets smaller. I'd like to see some smaller carriers end up with some of the divested assets.

  5. #5

    Kalimotxo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,181
    Phone(s)
    The latest and greatest.
    Provider(s)
    All of them.
    Likes
    14
    Images
    6

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by TNDan21 View Post
    I actually hope AT&Ticon or T-Mobileicon end up with the divested Alltel markets in Virginia. There is little to any GSM coverage in those areas up for divesture in SW VA.
    I agree 100%. GSM is a joke compared to CDMA.

  6. #6
    Who am I to judge hf1khal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ashburn VA
    Posts
    2,269
    Phone(s)
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Provider(s)
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    Devices
    MP3, GPS & PDA
    Likes
    54
    Images
    1

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    I in all honesty would opt for AT&Ticon to get asI am not a fan of private equity investors. They seem to always mess things up.

  7. #7
    Super Moderator M in LA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    7,899
    Phone(s)
    HTC Droid DNA
    Provider(s)
    Verizon Wireless (since 1994)
    Likes
    208

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    I'm hoping smaller CDMA carriers like US Cellular, MetroPCSicon, and Leap get all or most of the divested areas.
    PacTel Cellular (1994) became AIRTOUCH (1994-2000) which became verizonwireless (2000-Present)

  8. #8
    Go Lakers! larry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    13,715
    Phone(s)
    LG Optimus G
    Provider(s)
    Sprint
    Likes
    45
    Images
    166

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    I agree Mike. Spread the goods around a little to help the smaller CDMA carriers.

  9. #9
    Resident Spamslayer Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    12,286
    Phone(s)
    HTC Vivid LTE
    Moto V551, iPAQ 6515
    Western Electric 302, 500
    Ericsson Ericophone
    Provider(s)
    AT&Tingular 310-410
    Devices
    Zune 30gb & way too many BT devices to list
    Likes
    276
    Images
    158

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobile Mike View Post
    I'm hoping smaller CDMA carriers like US Cellular, MetroPCSicon, and Leap get all or most of the divested areas.
    LOL, in my area there were never any "small" CDMA Carriers. Alltel was the closest thing, and even they didn't have native service until you got 20 or 30 miles from here.
    http://www.speedtest.net/android/256739406.png

  10. #10
    Go Lakers! larry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    13,715
    Phone(s)
    LG Optimus G
    Provider(s)
    Sprint
    Likes
    45
    Images
    166

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Just give it all to AT&Ticon and further reduce competition in the wireless market. Nobody seems to mind paying the higher prices these days anyway.

  11. #11
    Who am I to judge hf1khal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ashburn VA
    Posts
    2,269
    Phone(s)
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Provider(s)
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    Devices
    MP3, GPS & PDA
    Likes
    54
    Images
    1

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Here is the problem, the smaller providers are not really looked at as competition so their lower price does not matter to the big 4. What I really like to see is 4 nationwide providers with at least some equal footing and then let the games begin. I think that once the market has saturated and not many new potential clients available the big 4 would have to compete to steal the others clients.

  12. #12
    Resident Spamslayer Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    12,286
    Phone(s)
    HTC Vivid LTE
    Moto V551, iPAQ 6515
    Western Electric 302, 500
    Ericsson Ericophone
    Provider(s)
    AT&Tingular 310-410
    Devices
    Zune 30gb & way too many BT devices to list
    Likes
    276
    Images
    158

    Arrow Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by hf1khal View Post
    Here is the problem, the smaller providers are not really looked at as competition so their lower price does not matter to the big 4. What I really like to see is 4 nationwide providers with at least some equal footing and then let the games begin. I think that once the market has saturated and not many new potential clients available the big 4 would have to compete to steal the others clients.
    Isn't that what the iPhone was all about? Having an exclusive device that "everyone" wanted?
    http://www.speedtest.net/android/256739406.png

  13. #13
    Who am I to judge hf1khal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ashburn VA
    Posts
    2,269
    Phone(s)
    iphone 4, 3G S, BB 9700
    Provider(s)
    AT&T Mobility, MTC Touch
    Devices
    MP3, GPS & PDA
    Likes
    54
    Images
    1

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Yes but that is not enough to do the job. It did help AT&Ticon but how long could that go on with the industry now taking aim on the iphone

  14. #14

    bobolito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    in front of my computer
    Posts
    12,726
    Phone(s)
    iPhone 5
    BlackberryTorch 9850
    Provider(s)
    T-Mobile
    Devices
    WiFi cards/Access points
    Likes
    41
    Images
    50

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by larry View Post
    I agree Mike. Spread the goods around a little to help the smaller CDMA carriers.
    Do you honestly believe that helps competition? All those small CDMA carriers will eventually end up on Verizonicon's shopping list, so what's the difference? At least selling those assets to T-Mobile or AT&Ticon will help balance the inconsistency in coverage.
    "Jobs was brave enough to think differently, bold enough to believe he could change the world, and talented enough to do it."
    -Barack Obama

  15. #15
    Woot Woot, Splat !!! KyleAndMelissa22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Gaffney/Spartanburg,SC
    Posts
    1,377
    Phone(s)
    LG AX4270 (x2)
    LG AX390 (backup)
    Pantech PN-218
    Provider(s)
    Allied Wireless d/b/a ALLTEL (SID 114, NID 7)
    Devices
    Grundig S350DL~ Kodak EasyShare~Seagate 500GB
    Likes
    36
    Images
    400

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by bobolito View Post
    Do you honestly believe that helps competition? All those small CDMA carriers will eventually end up on Verizonicon's shopping list, so what's the difference? At least selling those assets to T-Mobile or AT&Ticon will help balance the inconsistency in coverage.
    From Verizonicon's point of view, it would be smart to sell to the smaller carriers,
    because you're right, Verizon may eventually buy them out too.

    Selling to AT&Ticon, Verizon would never get those properties back.

    CDMA....Coming soon to a tower near you!

    Alltel user since September 5, 2006 - I'm proud to still be with them !!!

  16. #16
    Junior Member chokaay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    115
    Phone(s)
    Palm Centro
    Provider(s)
    Sprint
    Likes
    5

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by TNDan21 View Post
    I actually hope AT&Ticon or T-Mobileicon end up with the divested Alltel markets in Virginia. There is little to any GSM coverage in those areas up for divesture in SW VA.

    Too bad T-Mobileicon doesn't seem to be in on it (at least according to the article). I would rather T-Mobile get it than AT&Ticon... at least that would level the playing field a little more than it is now. At the rate mergers/buyouts are going for AT&T, pretty soon there won't be any "serious" nationwide GSM competition anymore (not that there seems to be now anyway... especially with all the terminated roaming agreements between AT&T and T-Mobile).

  17. #17
    Junior Member chokaay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    115
    Phone(s)
    Palm Centro
    Provider(s)
    Sprint
    Likes
    5

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleAndMelissa22 View Post
    From Verizonicon's point of view, it would be smart to sell to the smaller carriers,
    because you're right, Verizonicon may eventually buy them out too.

    Selling to AT&Ticon, Verizon would never get those properties back.

    And I also agree that it's probably within Verizon's interest to favor small carriers than major direct competitors. However, the question is... can the smaller carriers afford the price that Verizon/Altel wants? And if they can, is there any restrictions/limitation to selling to a lower bidder?

  18. #18
    Woot Woot, Splat !!! KyleAndMelissa22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Gaffney/Spartanburg,SC
    Posts
    1,377
    Phone(s)
    LG AX4270 (x2)
    LG AX390 (backup)
    Pantech PN-218
    Provider(s)
    Allied Wireless d/b/a ALLTEL (SID 114, NID 7)
    Devices
    Grundig S350DL~ Kodak EasyShare~Seagate 500GB
    Likes
    36
    Images
    400

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by chokaay View Post
    And I also agree that it's probably within Verizonicon's interest to favor small carriers than major direct competitors.
    However, the question is... can the smaller carriers afford the price that Verizonicon/Altel wants?
    And if they can, is there any restrictions/limitation to selling to a lower bidder?
    Like a give and take scenerio it seems (if they're smart),
    They'll practically give up properties to a small carrier dirt cheap, and then turn around and buy that company out.

    If Verizon could get the spectrum back by buying the smaller carrier out one day,
    then it seems like a better choice to sell to USCC or Cricket, rather than AT&Ticon or Sprint.

    My guess is that the are allowed to sell to whoever they want, because it's theirs to give away.
    As long as they get rid of it, thats all the FCC cares about.
    Last edited by KyleAndMelissa22; 02-07-2009 at 9:31 AM.

    CDMA....Coming soon to a tower near you!

    Alltel user since September 5, 2006 - I'm proud to still be with them !!!

  19. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    159

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by WumpusVA View Post
    I agree 100%. GSM is a joke compared to CDMA.

    Its such a joke, Verizonicon is committing to it. Duh. 4G gsm is still in the gsm family...

  20. #20
    Tool
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Middle GA
    Posts
    805
    Phone(s)
    iPhone 5 VZW
    iPhone 4S (wife)
    Provider(s)
    Verizon Wireless
    Likes
    36
    Images
    18

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullstrength View Post
    Its such a joke, Verizonicon is committing to it. Duh. 4G gsm is still in the gsm family...
    I generally accept GSM = "2G GSM" which at its heart is TDMA. Especially since 3G "GSM" is actually UMTS, which is on the "GSM Path", but is not "GSM". 4G would also happen to be UMTS of the LTE variety. Duh.

  21. #21
    Tool
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Middle GA
    Posts
    805
    Phone(s)
    iPhone 5 VZW
    iPhone 4S (wife)
    Provider(s)
    Verizon Wireless
    Likes
    36
    Images
    18

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by chokaay View Post
    And I also agree that it's probably within Verizonicon's interest to favor small carriers than major direct competitors. However, the question is... can the smaller carriers afford the price that Verizonicon/Altel wants? And if they can, is there any restrictions/limitation to selling to a lower bidder?
    Good point. It will probably come down to what dollar value VZW can place on NOT letting AT&Ticon have a particular market. There's probably very few places that VZW can keep AT&Ticon out of, or keep them in a spectrum starved position. So it will probably just come down to whoever is willing to pay more for the market--meaning AT&T most likely.

    I'm not aware of any restrictions on who they can sell the divestitures to. However, VZW will most likely be unable to reacquire any of these markets for a length of time without a judge's ruling. However, they did just get approval for a reacquisition of some of Alltel's markets, so that won't be a major stopping point.

  22. #22

    blsemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Powdersville, South Carolina
    Posts
    376
    Phone(s)
    Nokia 900
    Provider(s)
    at&t

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleAndMelissa22 View Post
    From Verizonicon's point of view, it would be smart to sell to the smaller carriers,
    because you're right, Verizonicon may eventually buy them out too.

    Selling to AT&Ticon, Verizon would never get those properties back.
    I don't think Vz is really worried about it. They have been swapping properties with T after acquisitions for a long time.

  23. #23
    .:|Always Covered|:. strunke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    BVR
    Posts
    1,805
    Phone(s)
    Blackberry 8230, KRZR K1m
    SLVR L6, v710
    E815, E816(ampd)
    LG 380, 8600
    Provider(s)
    Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial
    Devices
    Garmin eTrex Vista Cx, Bluetooth headset
    Likes
    6

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullstrength View Post
    Its such a joke, Verizonicon is committing to it. Duh. 4G gsm is still in the gsm family...
    GSM is not the 4G you speak of. In fact the 3G used by ATTicon, etc is not really gsm it is WCDMA or UMTS.
    www.ALLTELLIVES.com
    My words of wisdom and random thoughts....Doesn't matter how many people are on a network, you can only use one phone at a time...ok maybe two...

  24. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    159

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by strunke View Post
    GSM is not the 4G you speak of. In fact the 3G used by ATTicon, etc is not really gsm it is WCDMA or UMTS.

    3GPP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    It is . Its part of 3gpp or the gsm family. LTE is umts rev 8.

  25. #25
    .:|Always Covered|:. strunke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    BVR
    Posts
    1,805
    Phone(s)
    Blackberry 8230, KRZR K1m
    SLVR L6, v710
    E815, E816(ampd)
    LG 380, 8600
    Provider(s)
    Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial
    Devices
    Garmin eTrex Vista Cx, Bluetooth headset
    Likes
    6

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullstrength View Post
    3GPP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    It is . Its part of 3gpp or the gsm family. LTE is umts rev 8.
    But it is not GSM. The "family" is mostly irrelevant. The 3g and 4g choices by ATTicon and T-Mobile have more to do with cdma then gsm in their very nature. GSM is an antiquated technology as will be cdma, however the principles of cdma (which is what umts uses that is why it is also called wcdma) is not. They are not identical of course, but overall gsm the 2g interface option based off tdma has less to do with umts then cdma does. That is what WumpusVA and spleck was/were referring to. And I and most others agree with them. GSM will not exist in the modern countries in probably 5-8 years (guesstimate), while cdma will more then likely last longer yet, especially in principle given the fact that umts uses cdma variant as an air interface. With umts taking gsm's place as a entirely new technology separate from gsm. You see, the way GSM uses it's spectrum is less efficient overall then cdma does. That's why all things equal for example one tower in the desert with both panels on it at the same height, etc. CDMA will hold more calls and what not. There are variations with cdma such as cell "breathing" however in the same way that GSM networks have made up for their disadvantage with numbers and placement so really no one can tell the differences (because it's cheaper, "economies of scale" as it were, gsm is used more worldwide and cheaper in general to operate). Overall the concept of cdma is more efficient and the way of the near future (rather the variant it). If qualcomm hadn't made it so expensive and the carriers had adopted rium cards I honestly don't think GSM would have been chosen by cingular/ATTicon for their network. But, qualcomm will be getting some big royalty checks from LTE, though less of a percentage then with regular cdma.
    www.ALLTELLIVES.com
    My words of wisdom and random thoughts....Doesn't matter how many people are on a network, you can only use one phone at a time...ok maybe two...

  26. #26
    Gearhead/Gadget freak Buickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Bye Bye MN, Hello Cali
    Posts
    901
    Phone(s)
    BB 9550, Moto Droid
    Retired: BB Curve, LG9100
    Moto Z6tv, E815,V710
    Nokia 3285, Nokia 6185
    Provider(s)
    Verizon on both phones
    Likes
    9
    Images
    1

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    OK guys, let's skip the whole CDMA vs GSM debate here. Back on topic, VZW can't sell the spectrum to someone based on who it would be easier to acquire it from, because they can't have it, period! If they sold it to US Cellular, and then bought them 6 months later, they would just have to resell it again. There could also be some benefits to selling the CDMA properties to AT&Ticon. Not only would VZW get some of their money, but than AT&Ticon would have to devote time, money, and resources to converting the network to GSM. Now it isn't exactly a secret that AT&T is already way behind VZW in network deployment (about 3 years behind in 3G coverage), so giving them more work to do could be a good defensive move.
    Cars became my job, so phones became my hobby. Car's are not my job anymore, but phones are still a fun hobby.

  27. #27
    Iphone Hater tmobileman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    At my house
    Posts
    658
    Phone(s)
    G1v1.5, Dash, Touch Pro 2
    BB Pearl 8100, Curve 8320
    Razor V3t, V3, HD2
    Moto ROKR E8,SamsungD415
    Provider(s)
    Tmobile
    Devices
    Linksys WRTU54G Router, Moto H500 BT Headset
    Likes
    46

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by Buickman View Post
    OK guys, let's skip the whole CDMA vs GSM debate here. Back on topic, VZW can't sell the spectrum to someone based on who it would be easier to acquire it from, because they can't have it, period! If they sold it to US Cellular, and then bought them 6 months later, they would just have to resell it again. There could also be some benefits to selling the CDMA properties to AT&Ticon. Not only would VZW get some of their money, but than AT&Ticon would have to devote time, money, and resources to converting the network to GSM. Now it isn't exactly a secret that AT&T is already way behind VZW in network deployment (about 3 years behind in 3G coverage), so giving them more work to do could be a good defensive move.
    I think one of the reasons why vzw may not want to pick up the metro pcs or cricket type providers is because half the time these providers are pure profit for them already due to reselling of airtime and tower sharing, its the old principle of why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free.

  28. #28
    I have arrived!
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2
    Phone(s)
    iPhone
    HTC Tilt
    Motorola Q9h
    Provider(s)
    AT&T

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by WumpusVA View Post
    I agree 100%. GSM is a joke compared to CDMA.
    GSM is actually the world standard, CDMA is secondary. Used mostly in the US due to the low cost of building out a CDMA network from the ground up.

  29. #29
    Super Moderator M in LA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    7,899
    Phone(s)
    HTC Droid DNA
    Provider(s)
    Verizon Wireless (since 1994)
    Likes
    208

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by tiguemon View Post
    GSM is actually the world standard, CDMA is secondary. Used mostly in the US due to the low cost of building out a CDMA network from the ground up.
    With all due respect to you as a new member, this is a well-known detail here. The CDMA/GSM battle on this site has gotten long in the tooth.

    As was said in an earlier post, it's time to move on. Although the thought of Verizonicon/Alltel divestitures ending up in AT&Ticon's hands can bleed into the CDMA/GSM debate, it's better left out of this discussion as it leads to this thread getting way off topic, as earlier posts can attest.

    Welcome to Wireless Advisor, by the way.
    PacTel Cellular (1994) became AIRTOUCH (1994-2000) which became verizonwireless (2000-Present)

  30. #30
    .:|Always Covered|:. strunke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    BVR
    Posts
    1,805
    Phone(s)
    Blackberry 8230, KRZR K1m
    SLVR L6, v710
    E815, E816(ampd)
    LG 380, 8600
    Provider(s)
    Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial
    Devices
    Garmin eTrex Vista Cx, Bluetooth headset
    Likes
    6

    Default Re: AT&T and others drooling for VZW/Alltel divested markets

    Quote Originally Posted by tiguemon View Post
    GSM is actually the world standard, CDMA is secondary. Used mostly in the US due to the low cost of building out a CDMA network from the ground up.
    I could argue all day how that is incorrect. "World" standard doesn't= superior. But I'm not going to argue this and agree with Mobile Mike.

    Hey larry, any chance of Sprinticon finally breaking from their crazy policy of PCS and picking up some cellular markets?
    www.ALLTELLIVES.com
    My words of wisdom and random thoughts....Doesn't matter how many people are on a network, you can only use one phone at a time...ok maybe two...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Map and list of Markets to be divested by Verizon
    By ComicalMoodyDan in forum Verizon Wireless Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-12-2009, 4:05 PM
  2. Non Divested Alltel Numbers Now "IN"
    By racquetballer in forum Verizon Wireless Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 12:30 PM
  3. Alltel Swaps Markets with USC
    By MOTOhooligan in forum Wireless News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-14-2005, 12:40 PM
  4. ALLTEL BUYING CINGULAR/ATT MARKETS IN W. KY. What does this mean?
    By BG1811 in forum Central US Wireless Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-29-2004, 1:36 PM
  5. Jackson, MS and other Alltel Markets
    By DemoMan in forum Southern US Wireless Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-17-2003, 7:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Us | Advertising | Privacy Statement | Legal | Press | Feedback/Contact


Forum feeds:         Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Copyright 1997-2014 Wireless Advisor, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.