Wireless News | Subject: Qwest Now Talking to AT&T in Wireless Topics; I think Qwest is confused as to which way they want to go. Now they are talking to AT&T about ... | |||||||
| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Sites Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Wireless News Post and discuss the latest wireless news items in this forum. |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 757
Phone(s): Apple iPhone 3G 8GB, Motorola V3xx (PLT) Provider(s): at&t Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think Qwest is confused as to which way they want to go. Now they are talking to AT&T about possibly selling AT&T wireless service instead of Verizon Wireless. I also went to Qwest's cell phone section and the links talking about the transition to VZW are now gone. Qwest Talking to AT&T for Wireless
__________________ More Bars In More Places |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Maryland Posts: 256
Phone(s): Samsung Blackjack, Motorola RAZR V3, V3r, SW Aircard 875, Nokia 6010, Motorola V400 Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: iPod Video 30GB, Acer Aspire 5610-4648 Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Images: 7 |
Interesting. AT&T does have that golden key to the iPhone, maybe Qwest wants in on it.
|
| |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 757
Phone(s): Apple iPhone 3G 8GB, Motorola V3xx (PLT) Provider(s): at&t Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Yeah, the article mentioned that but, the article made it seem like it was iPhone was the only highlight of a relationship with AT&T. They mentioned that VZW has extensive bundling opportunities, same technology (CDMA), easier transition with VZW instead of AT&T. Honestly, given the choices, I would choose VZW if that were the case but, we'll just have to wait and see.
__________________ More Bars In More Places |
| |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| 4 years and counting... Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 4,635
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555, 6263 Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T, T-Mobile Thanks: 40
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
|
I thought Qwest made an official announcement about their partnership with Verizon months ago. So now they're changing their mind? You've got to be kidding me!!! It's going to be a drama enough to transition them to Verizon. Now they want to change it and possibly go with AT&T? Qwest wireless customers won't be amused. What a
__________________ (1994-Present) LG Voyagerat&t (2004-2005, 2006-Present) Nokia 6555 3G -T---Mobile- (2004-Present) Nokia 6263 3G |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Resident Headbanger Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Tardville Posts: 4,430
Phone(s): Katana II, HTC Vogue (Touch), Moto Q Provider(s): Sprint Devices: 30GB Zune & 1GB Zen Stone Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Images: 14 | IMHO that pretty much sums up Qwest. I had to deal with them when I lived in Oregon, never again.
__________________ Thanks Sprint for turning on EV in Bullhead & Laughlin, just hurry it up with Ft. Mohave!!! |
| |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 757
Phone(s): Apple iPhone 3G 8GB, Motorola V3xx (PLT) Provider(s): at&t Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well, I have my home phone, DSL and DirecTV all together bundled with Qwest. Qwest in terms of my service has been fine but, with this cell phone thing, they are screwing up. You can't release official statements saying an agreement with VZW has been reached and will start in the summer and post info about it on the site and then say "oh wait, we're talking to AT&T" and take the VZW transition information down off the site. I agree that current Qwest Wireless customers will not be happy.
|
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Go Angels! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 12,846
Phone(s): LG Rumor Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 11
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Images: 144 |
I'm just happy that Sprint was able to acquire a whole bunch of Qwest's cell sites 4 years ago. It really helped beef up their coverage in the Pacific Northwest, Phoenix, Denver, etc. In fact I believe they picked up 76 sites in the Phoenix market alone from Qwest the last time I counted.
|
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 757
Phone(s): Apple iPhone 3G 8GB, Motorola V3xx (PLT) Provider(s): at&t Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I will fess up and say it looks like I made an error everyone. If you look at the article, it was dated March 6 of this year. O_O I didn't even catch that until someone pointed that out. So it looks like this article is old and not new as I thought it was. I apologize everyone, if I would've cought that, I wouldn't have wasted everyone's time by posting this thread. Its strange though, the timing was just right of certain things for this to appear new. After I read the article, I checked Qwest's website and they took down the links for the information on transitioning to VZW which would make it seem like they changed their mind. Also DSLReports just posted the link to the article yesterday which is also why I thought it was new. I notified the site about the date on the article. LOL Anyway, sorry everyone, my mistake in not catching the date on the article. |
| |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: in my own house Posts: 1,404
Phone(s): crackberry's Devices: my home wi-fi router and laptop Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Images: 49 | vzw is greedy and the deal with qwest probably came out only to the benfit of vzw and not both partys. att probably brought a nice counter offer and now everything is back to square one. also this would be a great deal for ATT. it would basically mean that they would finally have some rural licenses for much of the west and midwest |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Seattle, Washington USA Posts: 1,220
Phone(s): Nokia 8801, Nokia 6310i,, Nokia 6030, Nokia 6010,, Nokia 3510i, Nokia 8310, Provider(s): T-Mobile-US, Fido (CA), T-Mobile NL, Orange IL Devices: iPod Nano Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #12 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Memphis, TN Posts: 823
Phone(s): HTC Tilt 8925, NEC 525 HDM, Nokia 6340i GAIT, Motorola Select 2000e Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: MP3 players, WWVB wristwatch Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Qwest sold off its PCS licenses initially to Sprint, and the remainder to VZW. All it has left are wireless customers, with no facilities. COtech
__________________ A SLA gets the trouble away! | |
| |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| iPhone 3G 16GB (White) Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Sanfrakota Posts: 12,364
Phone(s): iPhone 3G, RAZR V9, Sierra 875 3G Aircard, HP iPaq Classic 110 Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: WiFi cards/Access points Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Images: 50 |
Ok, since everything has been clarified in post #8, I'm going to close this thread. So make sure you check post #8 before you think of anything else. By the way, did I mention you should all go and read post #8?
__________________ |
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V3M Talking phone settings | hopinpop | RAZR Phones | 2 | 01-02-2007 12:36 PM |
| Does Michigan have a law against talking while driving? | michiganeric | Wireless News | 9 | 10-29-2003 4:47 PM |
| talking quietly | joes | Southern US Wireless Forum | 4 | 09-02-2003 2:19 PM |
| 8100 backlight when talking? | markv83 | Sanyo | 7 | 06-02-2003 10:59 AM |