| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Sites Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Wireless News Post and discuss the latest wireless news items in this forum. |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #121 (permalink) | |
| In LV Dec 3, In NJ Dec 10 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: GAFFNEY, SC (FORMERLY NJ) Posts: 992
Phone(s): LG AX4270 Provider(s): ALLTEL - SID 114 (Near 116 Border). Devices: Grundig S350DL, Nikon CoolPix, PRO-89 Scanner Thanks: 27
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Images: 231 | Quote:
Roaming agreements keep prices low for consumers, and also, it literally does make your potential coverage area larger. Native footprints are good, but native footprints with roaming agreements are alot better. Even the best native footprint will still have many many weak areas, this is where roaming agreements will save you in many cases.
__________________ ![]() CDMA....Coming Soon To A Tower Near You! Alltel User Since September 2006 - Now I'm Good Until August 2010 !!! | |
| | |
| | #122 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: U.S.A. legally Posts: 436
Phone(s): obama won, america lost Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
the fcc monday also , so i'll just kill his vote for support. | |
| | |
| | #123 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Hampton Roads, VA Posts: 823
Phone(s): Palm Centro, LG Wave, Moto E815 Provider(s): Sprint and alltel Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
It's real easy to forget, but carriers compete in terms of having the best coverage, as well as the best price, until they're satisfied with their customer base or coverage in an area. So less competition will lead to a poorer quality of service. Even in areas where alltel, or Dobson, or SunCom didn't compete. Verizon and at&t having to compete against those providers in other areas led to competetive rates, and standards of service. And once Verizon and/or At&t does reach the point where they don't need roaming agreements, that may be a huge blow, and perhaps an eventual downfall of Sprint and T-Mobile. But then, maybe we'll see gov't regulation of the industry or even the wireless baby bell breakup. And it may not happen. This may be a great thing for VZW customers and the industry in general. When you combine the best Verizon networks and the best alltel networks, nobody is going to touch this provider in terms of coverage in many, many markets across the nation. The airwaves probably do only support 4-5 national carriers. I'm sure the people that ran alltel will cash out with millions. In fact, they actually did several months ago by selling to TPG and GS. The main people I feel sorry for, are the ones who had alltel service, or even Dobson or SunCom, and were satisfied with coverage, but will now have to pay more for the same thing. And I'm also just concerned because using history as a guide, consolidation in the wireless industry has not been good for customers or employees, and I fear that Verizon may not show many rural customers the same commitment to coverage and data in the future that alltel did. But given the fact that alltel was looking for a way out of the game it appeared, and being saddled with 22 billion in debt from the last buyout, a transition to Verizon is probably the best thing. I know that many would be furious with the level of customer support, and coverage in some places given by Sprint. Then there'd be some iPCS lawsuit over it. At&t and T-Mobile would also present far more complications that would probably be worse off for most customers. Last edited by UFO; 06-08-2008 at 2:31 AM. Reason: Few more thoughts |
| | |
| | #124 (permalink) | ||||
| Banned | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I just feel if someone is for this then they are getting shot down please have respect. I think the assumption of higher prices and this and that being taken away are valid although nothing is set in stone until the final t is crossed and i is dotted. | ||||
| | |
| | #125 (permalink) |
| 4 years and counting... Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 4,635
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555, 6263 Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T, T-Mobile Thanks: 40
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
|
Why is everyone surprised that this "private equity group" sold out so quickly?. I'm betting a deal like this was planned from the start. I wouldn't be surprised if they were secretly looking for a buyout suitor as soon as the ink was dry on their deal for Alltel. Why is it also a surprise that this deal happened? Alltel certainly holds more worthy cards than US Cellular or any other smaller carrier. I bet if Sprint wasn't in the morass they are right now, they probably would have made a play for Alltel themselves. Would everyone be complaining the same way if this had happened? I wonder... I agree with everyone that the loss of competition is not a good thing, but sadly mergers of this type are common business these days. I have little faith things will change any time soon. I shouldn't be surprise how much rancor I've read here and on HoFo from people who dislike Verizon, but they aren't the devil incarnate for everybody. For all of the complaining people do about them, they continually grow with subscriber additions, they have a low churn rate, etc. Verizon is not perfect by any means, but they work for many people, myself included. Though I'm not always thrilled with the things they do, I can't complain after more than a decade of solid service. Frankly AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, Alltel, USCellular, MetroPCS, Cricket, and every other MVNO/Cell company out there SUCK!! NO carrier is perfect. So Verizon has just bought Alltel. Deal with it. Unless you can come up with some major billions to buy them out, there isn't much anyone can do about it now.
__________________ (1994-Present) LG Voyagerat&t (2004-2005, 2006-Present) Nokia 6555 3G -T---Mobile- (2004-Present) Nokia 6263 3G |
| | |
| | #126 (permalink) |
| Big Meanie Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Mesa, AZ Posts: 8,306
Phone(s): Moto V950 Provider(s): Sprint + Airave Devices: ipod 80gb, MacBook pro Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Images: 1 |
I think that is well said Mike.
|
| | |
| | #127 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The only real solution to competition in the US is a realistic system for managing spectrum. The FCC pretends that it wants competition but than encourages massive consolidation. If we want real competition than the FCC needs to setup five (or so) national licenses and include a rule limiting you to just one of them. This would acknowledge the way the market is really going and ensure that there'd still be a realistic level of competition and less spectrum hoarding. It'll never happen though. |
| | |
| | #128 (permalink) |
| Get me out of Newbieville! Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm not surprised that this happened at all. VZW has had its eyes on Alltel for a long time. For me, I would finally get to be on "The Network" and talk to those that have VZW (many of my buddies are using them). I currently cannot get a local number with Verizon, but if the merger is approved (which is expected to go through), that should change in the future. So, I kinda look forward to that. I know it's not going to be positive news for everyone, and hopefully, the negative impact will be minimal. 50-100% increase in the bills? I seriously doubt that much. |
| | |
| | #129 (permalink) | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Minneapolis/Area Code 612 Posts: 100
Phone(s): BlackBerry Curve Provider(s): Verizon Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #130 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Minneapolis/Area Code 612 Posts: 100
Phone(s): BlackBerry Curve Provider(s): Verizon Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Do you really think that the FCC cares what any of us have to say anyway? This deal will be approved with some divestitures but there is no way in this econmic climate it will be killed. Aside from the ramifications from cellular users, the assumption of $27 billlion debt by a high quality company like Verizon will aid the credit markets and is certainly another factor that may be considered.
|
| | |
| | #131 (permalink) | |
| .:|Always Covered|:. Join Date: May 2005 Location: BVR Posts: 1,699
Phone(s): KRZR K1m, SLVR L6, v710, E815, E816(ampd), LG 380, 8600 Provider(s): Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial Devices: Garmin eTrex Vista Cx, Bluetooth headset Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
The merger in the end is good for coverage. Good for vzw customers. Bad for Alltel customers money wise most likley. But there is a potential for Verizon to implement some of Alltel's good aspects. It's free market and capitalism and I love that. I just hate the fact that my prices will be going up and my circle most likely disappearing.
__________________ www.ALLTELLIVES.com My words of wisdom and random thoughts....Doesn't matter how many people are on a network, you can only use one phone at a time...ok maybe two... | |
| | |
| | #132 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: SoCali Posts: 1,116
Phone(s): BlackBerry Pearl 8120, Moto S9 StereoBT Headset Provider(s): T-Mobile USA Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Besides, you'll be able to keep your current plan most likely since it'll be grandfathered. | |
| | |
| | #133 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Middle GA Posts: 498
Phone(s): iPhone 3G, T-Mobile Wing Provider(s): AT&T, T-Mobile Devices: Garmin GPSMAP 76CSx, Canon EOS Rebel XTi Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 18 |
I haven't been able to get Alltel service anywhere I've ever lived, so I've never considered them competition. This is just more native coverage for me like all the other mergers and acquisitions. Through them all, my service has gone from $35 for 250 minutes regional coverage with no roaming, no M2M to $40 for 450 minutes national coverage with roaming and M2M. So not only has my service greatly improved, but the cost has risen slower than inflation. If you had Alltel and are now faced with higher costs, then consider the idea that those low costs are why your carrier couldn't stand on its own and was sold off. To everyone calling the FCC: its not American Idol--you don't get a "vote". You can express your concerns, but unless they have some legal basis, your carrier preference is not going to sway the FCC. This merger will reduce costs for VZW more than it will decrease competition. Towers are EXPENSIVE--and they're not free to maintain once you put them up. When AT&T wants to buy T-Mobile, or VZW thinks they can buy a nationwide competitor like Sprint, then I'll take issue. |
| | |
| | #134 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Middle GA Posts: 498
Phone(s): iPhone 3G, T-Mobile Wing Provider(s): AT&T, T-Mobile Devices: Garmin GPSMAP 76CSx, Canon EOS Rebel XTi Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 18 |
What plan are most of you Alltel subscribers on that your prices will go up? I understand that anyone extensively using My Circle will probably face a larger usage of anytime minutes, I'm just curious. I glanced at the Alltel rates and it seems like My Circle wasn't available on the $40 plan. I don't talk on the phone a lot and neither does anyone I know, but I also know that we're all lower than the ARPU.
|
| | |
| | #135 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: U.S.A. legally Posts: 436
Phone(s): obama won, america lost Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
per line (2) 10 my circle,kb;s are paid for by min. not $, i just entered a 2 yr. contract 2 month's ago, vzw WILL honor this contract as is,or i'll cancel and pay no etf. | |
| | |
| | #136 (permalink) | |
| In LV Dec 3, In NJ Dec 10 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: GAFFNEY, SC (FORMERLY NJ) Posts: 992
Phone(s): LG AX4270 Provider(s): ALLTEL - SID 114 (Near 116 Border). Devices: Grundig S350DL, Nikon CoolPix, PRO-89 Scanner Thanks: 27
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Images: 231 | Quote:
One is the Nat'l Freedom 900 and the other is Nat'l Freedom 1400, each one has a line added for $10. (total of 4 people on the 2 accounts) Each account gets 10 My Circle numbers, and one line on the 1400 gets unlimited text/pix/video for $20 more. My Nat'l 900 plan on one account, advertised at $69.98 totals an average of about $82.00 per month, and my other account, the Nat'l 1400, advertised at $89.98 totals an average of about $115.00 per month. So I pay about $50 per person, per month, or about $200 per month, which isn't that bad per person. My contract expires in mid-September of this year, so hopefully I'll renew it (and get 2 My Circle Bonus Numbers) before this deal closes.
__________________ ![]() CDMA....Coming Soon To A Tower Near You! Alltel User Since September 2006 - Now I'm Good Until August 2010 !!! | |
| | |
| | #137 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Alltel was doing well when it was taken private. It not a matter of being unable to compete. The shareholders decided they wanted their money quickly rather than over the long haul. The private equity firms who took it private couldn't afford the purchase price and had to sell.
|
| | |
| | #139 (permalink) |
| iPhone 3G 16GB (White) Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Sanfrakota Posts: 12,360
Phone(s): iPhone 3G, RAZR V9, Sierra 875 3G Aircard, HP iPaq Classic 110 Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: WiFi cards/Access points Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Images: 50 |
One thing I see happening is that FCC will require divestiture of one of the 850Mhz blocks in rural markets where Verizon would own both 850Mhz blocks. The same thing was required of AT&T/Cingular merger in a few areas.
__________________ |
| | |