3 days & $86.00 for the iPhone battery change

[Fire14]

iPhone’s battery swap: $86 and three days

Apple Inc. provided information on how the iPhone’s battery replacement will take place and how much it will cost. The iPhone vendor’s choice of a sealed-in battery—the same approach used in the iPod—has generated some criticism. The battery is estimated by Apple to handle several hundred charges before losing its ability to hold a charge.

The service fee for a new battery is $79.00, plus $7 for shipping.

“The repair process normally takes three business days,” according to Apple’s Web site, and users must backup their data prior to sending the device to Apple for a battery swap.

“It is important to sync your iPhone with iTunes to back up your contacts, photos, email account settings, text messages and more,” Apple said. “Apple is not responsible for the loss of information while servicing your iPhone and does not offer any data transfer service.”

The iPhone vendor mentioned that users may rent an “AppleCare Service Phone”—don’t freak, it’s an iPhone, for a $29 fee—while their own iPhone is being “repaired.”

Whether consumers will choose to send in their iPhone after their original battery loses its effectiveness is likely to be closely watched. Analyst Shiv Bakhshi at IDC said the replaceable battery “raises concerns.”

“Could this be a tool of planned obsolescence, designed into the device as a means of enticing consumers to upgrade to a new iPhone?” Bakhshi asked, rhetorically, in a recent report.

The result would be locking in consumers not just to Apple but to AT&T Mobility, the iPhone’s exclusive domestic carrier, the analyst said.

iPhone’s battery swap: $86 and three days :: RCR Wireless News

[Fire14]

Apple Issues Battery Replacement Program For iPhone



A consumer advocacy group has expressed outrage over Apple's battery replacement program for the iPhone, while developers and hackers are trying to figure out ways they could expand the capabilities of the hot new gadget.

The hybrid cell phone, iPod media player and wireless Web-browsing device launched to much fanfare on June 29. On the same day, the Foundation for Consumer and Taxpayer Rights fired off a letter to Apple and AT&T, the cell phone's exclusive carrier, complaining that customers were being left in the dark about the procedure and cost of replacing the gadget's battery.

The iPhone's battery is apparently soldered on inside the device and cannot be swapped out by the owner like most other cell phones.

Apple spokeswoman Jennifer Hakes said Thursday the company posted the battery replacement details on its Web site last Friday after the product went on sale.

Users would have to submit their iPhone to Apple for battery service. The service will cost users $79, plus $6.95 for shipping, and will take three business days.

The procedure is similar to the one it has for the company's best-selling iPod players, but because some users will not want to live without their cell phones, Apple is also offering a loaner iPhone for $29 while the gadget is under repair.

Harvey Rosenfield, founder of the Santa Monica, Calif.-based consumer watchdog group that wrote the letter last week, contends the iPhone's battery and repair costs should have been clearly disclosed earlier. The company outlined its cellular service rates and many other features of the iPhone in advance of its launch, which drew snaking lines around stores across the country.

"Some of them might be waking up now," Rosenfield said, "wondering who they got in bed with."

Apple did not have an immediate comment on the consumer group's concerns.

Rosenfield said he didn't detect the battery information, which is located under several layers of links on Apple's support page on its Web site, until earlier this week. Technology blogs also started reporting their discoveries of it this week while one of the questions Wall Street Journal tech columnist Walt Mossberg fielded Thursday from his readers was about what happens when the iPhone battery dies.

"The cell phone industry is notorious for not being consumer-friendly while Apple has a fairly good reputation, so for Apple to stand on a technicality of a hidden disclosure that's going to cost the user as much as 20% of the purchase price I think will prove to be a colossal mistake," Rosenfield said.

The iPhone costs $499 or $599, depending on the model, and requires a minimum two-year $60-a-month service plan with AT&T.

The consumer and taxpayer organization has gone to court over these kinds of issues in the past. It is embroiled in a pending lawsuit against Cingular, now part of AT&T, over its service termination fees, and is also one of the plaintiffs in a pending lawsuit against Apple over an early model iPod Nano that was allegedly defective because it scratched easily.

In addition, Rosenfield said, replacing the iPhone battery should be free to begin with while the product is under its one-year warranty.

He also questioned why Apple chose to go against the norm of what cell phone users are accustomed to - swapping out their own batteries and generally at a cost that is less than half of what Apple is charging now for the iPhone.

"I'm just surprised at Apple's decision to defy the common practice of allowing people to purchase replacement batteries," he said. "And the fact that the information is buried is just not appropriate."

Apple has not disclosed how many iPhones were available at launch, though analysts have speculated the amount was 500,000 or more. AT&T said the gadget had sold out at most of its stores on the night of the launch while many Apple stores ran out of stock by early this week. Those ordering the iPhone online through Apple's Web site on Thursday were being promised delivery would be in two to four weeks.

Meanwhile, software developers anxious to find ways they could introduce applications tailored for the iPhone's Web browser were preparing to get together in Silicon Valley this weekend at an ad hoc conference called iPhoneDevCamp.

Also, a tech-savvy audience cheered the latest work this week of a hacker known for cracking copy-protection technology and creating workarounds of Apple products. Jon Lech Johansen, also known as "DVD Jon," posted on his blog Tuesday a method for people to turn on the iPod and Wi-Fi features - but not the cell phone functions - of the iPhone without going through the required activation process and service fees of AT&T.

Johansen did not respond Thursday to emails seeking comment.

Apple Issues Battery Replacement Program For iPhone

[bobolito]

I can expect blogs posting detailed instructions on how to replace the iPhone's battery. Anyone with some basic soldering skills should be able to replace the battery themselves. And I bet you'll see after-market iPhone batteries on Ebay.

It seems odd to me that a company like Apple, who portrays their OS UI as so user friendly, but yet their hardware maintenance/replacement is so user UNfriendly. At least they could've used a micro-connector like some cordless phones use.

[Jerro]

Originally Posted by bobolito

I can expect blogs posting detailed instructions on how to replace the iPhone's battery. Anyone with some basic soldering skills should be able to replace the battery themselves. And I bet you'll see after-market iPhone batteries on Ebay.

It seems odd to me that a company like Apple, who portrays their OS UI as so user friendly, but yet their hardware maintenance/replacement is so user UNfriendly. At least they could've used a micro-connector like some cordless phones use.

Right, it is more than odd, it is not thoughtful at all. So what else did they forget? Next model perhaps will have a slide in battery like every other phone.

[bobolito]

Apple seems to forget that they have to give up some things when entering the wireless phone business. Having a non-removable battery is one thing that was inherited from the iPod and the wireless phone market is never going to be happy with that. The iPod market has learned to tolerate that, but I don't think the wireless phone market will. But we have to give time for Apple to learn how the wireless industry works. The lack of video capture and MMS are just lessons to be learned.

[RJB]

Originally Posted by bobolito

Apple seems to forget that they have to give up some things when entering the wireless phone business. Having a non-removable battery is one thing that was inherited from the iPod and the wireless phone market is never going to be happy with that. The iPod market has learned to tolerate that, but I don't think the wireless phone market will. But we have to give time for Apple to learn how the wireless industry works. The lack of video capture and MMS are just lessons to be learned.

I go agree with you bobo

[twopiece]

This was one of the main reasons I declined on the idea of getting the iphone. Whenever I purchase a new phone, I always pick up a second battery no matter what.

[hf1khal]

As many know it is pure greed for more money and if they are going to take their time on new introductions this would fill in the gap a bit. There will be some cosumer back lash and if a battery is to be replaced within 1 year and the phone is under warantee and since the phone battery is not accessable by the user then it is part of the whole phone and people will raise hell on them on a device of this cost. I know I would.