| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 |
According to some news releases out today Nextel would not rebuild their network with a new technology. Instead they would piggy back on Sprint's network (similar to what Qwest did) which would save them billions of dollars. Nextel would then gradually prod it's customers to switch handsets for new ones with Sprint technology. I assume what would happen is that many of Nextel's towers/cell sites & equipment would be changed out to CDMA. Any areas where Nextel has service and Sprint doesn't (ie. Hwy 395 in California) would be transformed from Nextel coverage to Sprint coverage by changing out hardware and equipment. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: on the right coast Posts: 326 Phone(s): i95cl, R85.01.02, w/ SYN0547 Provider(s): Nextel Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry7510/3.7.2 UP.Browser/5.0.3.3 UP.Link/4.2.3.5h) Yeah, I could see that happening. I wouldn't be surprised to see dual mode phones being introduced either. And QChat might be launched for Sprint which works CDMA with iDEN networks. It will be interesting to see how this merger will be executed, and the impact for Nextel customers. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Signal Go Down De Hole... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Heim of Ana Posts: 3,237 Phone(s): BlackBerry 8830, LG KG800 (GSM Chocolate) Provider(s): Verizon(US) Rogers(CA) Vodafone(ES) 3(HK) Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Dual-mode phones doing iDEN and CDMA would be expensive; expensive to the point where Sprintel would lose millions in handset subsidies. I don't think that will happen. Nevertheless, Nextel's brand loyalty is sacred and they daren't degrade Nextel performance until their customers switch to Sprint-type phones. No, other than Sprint-to-Nextel and Nextel-to-Sprint calling being free, I don't see too many customer-facing improvements. Perhaps some coverage improvements due to ease of colocation (permits for Sprint towers could carry Nextel cells, for example), but this is obviously primarily a back-office merger. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Eastern Pennsylvania Posts: 951 Phone(s): Samsung SCH i760,, Samsung M600, SGH-R220,, Moto SLVR L7, many retired Provider(s): SKT, Verizon, China Mobile, EPlus Devices: Nuvi 855 Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
It does seem to answer the question as to how Nextel will offer high speed data service in the future. It looks like it will be via CDMA2000 rather than Flarion.
|
| | |
| | Original Poster
#5 | |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Easy,Cheap & Sleazy Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Union County NJ Posts: 8,457 Phone(s): EnV, V750 Provider(s): Verizon Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Images: 293 |
This may be part of there way to satisfy the FCC's requirement to get off the 800 band & switch to the 1900, with less cost then originally expected & Sprint would end up with more spectrum that Nextel is getting.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Monroe, Ohio Posts: 67 Phone(s): Motorola V325, Motorola RAZR V3m Provider(s): Verizon Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm thinking of actually upgrading my Nextel phone here in a few weeks, am I wasting my money b/c of the merger or should I go ahead and buy it? Also, are Nextel users going to lose out on this deal b/c of Sprint taking over their towers? |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#8 |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 |
No why would you think Nextel users might lose out? Nextel's towers along with Sprint's will ultimately be combined together (one way or another) so that coverage will be better for all of us.
|
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: San Diego Posts: 475 Phone(s): Treo 700P Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 10 | Quote:
As an aside, related to the integration of ATT/Cingular- my friend lost her phone and they won't let her get a new one (Razr) until her account is transferred to Cingular from ATT. But wait, they can't seem to get it transferred. She must also switch to a more expensive plan ($10) with fewer minutes (100). in order to go over to Cingular G. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| iPhone 3G 16GB (White) Join Date: May 2002 Location: in front of my computer Posts: 12,575 Phone(s): iPhone 3G, Sierra 875 3G Aircard Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: WiFi cards/Access points Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Images: 50 |
We are all speculating about combining Nextel/Sprint networks but we are ignoring one major problem: You can't put CDMA on Nextel's spectrum. The only spectrum Sprint will be able to take advantage of will be the G block 1900Mhz and even that's not a standard block. All existing SPCS equipment is not equipped to handle the G block. It isn't like as soon as the merger happens all Sprint has to do is convert Nextel towers to CDMA. It doesn't work that way. Sprint will have to install CDMA equipment using their OWN spectrum, not Nextel's, for the benefit of all Sprint/Virgin/Qwest/etc. customers. So they can do this even without the merger because it is an expansion, not a combination of networks. They can't combine networks because of the incompatibility in both the technology and spectrum. As I said, they can't put CDMA on SMR spectrum because it is against the FCC rules. And if Sprint begins to use the yet-to-be-awarded G block to Nextel, only after customers change to a new phone that is able to use the G block will they see some benefit. Nextel doesn't even have the G block yet. So whatever happens will be years away. So let's come back to reality guys. It's not going to be that easy.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: San Diego Posts: 475 Phone(s): Treo 700P Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 10 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#12 |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 |
Agreed. Sprint can easily co-locate their equipment on exsisting Nextel towers to provide coverage in areas that Sprint has either been struggling to gain approvals for due to NIMBY"s and new zoning restrictions or simply felt it wasn't in their budget in the past. One great example of this is Hwy 395 here in CA.
Last edited by larry; 12-14-2004 at 3:33 AM. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Busy chasing my son Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Lititz, Pa. Posts: 4,883 Phone(s): Motorola Cliq, BlackBerry 8820 Provider(s): T-Mobile Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Images: 2 | Quote:
__________________ Join the T-Mobile Group Forum (or any other!) ...a/k/a cheerioboy26 elsewhere on the net.... | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 445 Provider(s): AT&T Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
http://www.dailywireless.org/modules...ticle&sid=1605 Correction - it appears from the read there is another 10 Hz in the 800 band that isn't part of the swap, so they retain 16 total in the 800 band. | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 445 Provider(s): AT&T Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
In any case, why in the world would the FCC care whether the technology is CDMA, TDMA, IDEN, or AMPS? That is retarded (on the part of the FCC). There is nothing "incompatible" with CDMA at 800 MHz! | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| iPhone 3G 16GB (White) Join Date: May 2002 Location: in front of my computer Posts: 12,575 Phone(s): iPhone 3G, Sierra 875 3G Aircard Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: WiFi cards/Access points Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Images: 50 |
TKR, the problem is more complicated than it seems. First of all, the spectrum swap deal doesn't mean Nextel is giving up all its SMR spectrum as stated in the posts above. They will have some SMR spectrum and will get some PCS spectrum in the new G block. The problem is that all these frequencies are incompatible with current CDMA phones and base stations for several reasons. One is that current CDMA phones were designed to find towers only within the PCS A through F blocks and in the Cellular A and B blocks. Nextels SMR spectrum and the new G block are all outside those ranges and current phones cannot pick up any of those frequencies. So that means new phones will need to be put up for sale that will take advantage of these new frequencies. Secondly, the SMR spectrum is not licensed in blocks like Cellular and PCS. SMR is licensed per channel. So that means each channel of whatever transmitter you use has to be 25khz wide as per FCC rules. The problem is CDMA uses channels that are much more wider than that. So putting CDMA on SMR frequencies goes against FCC rules. Finally, even if the FCC allows CDMA in the SMR spectrum, new base station equipment will have to be redesigned so that it can transmit and receive in these new non-standard frequencies. Now, even though this rule doesn't apply to the PCS G block, the same goes for it because it is a non-standard PCS block. So basically, the entire structure has to be reworked. Now, this doesn't mean that CDMA cannot be put there. You can put CDMA in any frequency you like. However, as said previously, this means that none of the current phones can use those new frequencies because there are no CDMA phones that can scan in the G PCS block or in the SMR band because they were only designed to scan in the original Cellular and PCS frequencies to begin with. So unless those phones are changed so that they can receive and transmit in these new frequencies, millions of customers cannot use those new frequencies. So in all honesty, what I believe they will do is keep iDEN in the SMR band just for PTT service. One thing that is clear to me is that they cannot get rid of iDEN any time soon. Nextel is making a lot of money from it right now and high paying business clients want to have PTT especially when there is no rivaling technology at this time. ReadyLink, PoC and all these other PTT-wannabes are just jokes at this point when compared to iDEN's PTT. They can't match the reliability and robustness of iDEN at this time. Maybe in the future some rival technologies will come. But at this point there isn't any. The other thing I can see them doing is start selling broadband data service using the G block and keep voice service in standard Sprint PCS spectrum bands freeing up the SMR band for PTT traffic only through iDEN. That just what seems more realistic to me. Nonetheless, it's just my 2 cents. Given this scenario, the possibility of an iDEN/CDMA phone would not be too far off. I'm sure it would be in Motorola's best interest to come up with such a product if the plans turn out to be like that.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,425 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This is not like the AWE/Cingular where both are using the same Technology. The only advantage here besides Tower Co-location will be the free Network Calling between Sprint and Nextel.
__________________ - 3 Billion GSM Users by 2009. - 700 GSM Carriers in 220 Countries - 82% of the Global Market 45,000 Cell Sites and Adding. |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#18 | |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 | Quote:
Free network calling between 39 million people is also a lot better than only 23 million people. | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 445 Provider(s): AT&T Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for the feedback - that all makes sense. I'd like to think Sprint-Nextel would eventually want to migrate all spectrum to CDMA and grab some of that 800 spectrum for regular phone customers, not just PTT. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 | ||
| Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: US Virgin Islands Posts: 754 Phone(s): iPhone 3GS Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: iPod Touch 2G, WiFi gear Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #21 |
| Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 445 Provider(s): AT&T Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Interesting facts came out in the news conference. They will: 1) Maintain/improve IDEN for the near term. Migrate non-PTT voice to CDMA as quickly as possible. Maintain IDEN for "PTT centric" customers for medium term. 2) Quickly use Nextel 800 spectrum/sites for CDMA voice to improve overall coverage along with existing 1900 CDMA network. 3) Longer term, develop PTT on EVDO Rev A. Dual Mode handsets will be developed for market in about a year. Last edited by TKR; 12-15-2004 at 12:44 PM. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Pennsauken,NJ Posts: 762 Phone(s): Instinct Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Bottom line, this was the smartest and most cost effective move for both companies. You can dissect it all you want, but it sounds to me like Nextel and Sprint were planning this for a while, and together they will be quite the powerhouse.
__________________ "Make something fool-proof and someone will make a better fool." |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#23 | |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #24 |
| iPhone 3G 16GB (White) Join Date: May 2002 Location: in front of my computer Posts: 12,575 Phone(s): iPhone 3G, Sierra 875 3G Aircard Provider(s): AT&T Mobility Devices: WiFi cards/Access points Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Images: 50 |
Since this deal will add 800Mhz to Sprint's network, maybe this will silence those critics who claim there isn't any difference in building penetration between the two bands. However, as I said before in repeated occasions, there isn't going to be any IMMEDIATE improvements from this deal. Notice the word IMMEDIATE which means "in the short term." Once again, I said there won't be any immediate, prompt or quick coverage improvements, as in a few days following the merger. By the way, did I say there won't be any IMMEDIATE coverage improvements with this deal?
__________________ |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#25 |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Signal Go Down De Hole... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Heim of Ana Posts: 3,237 Phone(s): BlackBerry 8830, LG KG800 (GSM Chocolate) Provider(s): Verizon(US) Rogers(CA) Vodafone(ES) 3(HK) Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hm... "Sprint PCS" is no longer appropriate, since they'll have a little bit of 800 MHz.
|
| | |
| | Original Poster
#27 |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 |
True but I think the whole "PCS" thing is old anyway and it's time to drop that. In fact they already have dropped it for the most part.
|
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Busy chasing my son Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Lititz, Pa. Posts: 4,883 Phone(s): Motorola Cliq, BlackBerry 8820 Provider(s): T-Mobile Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Images: 2 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: on the right coast Posts: 326 Phone(s): i95cl, R85.01.02, w/ SYN0547 Provider(s): Nextel Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry7510/3.7.2 UP.Browser/5.0.3.3 UP.Link/4.2.3.5h) Duh, they announced the name change to Sprint Nextel Anyway a dual mode handset was probably in the works anyway as Nextel was going to ween people off the iDEN network anyway. In addition Nextel bought QChat a while ago and has used it for CDMA to iDEN PTT coversations from here to overseas. The MMDS spectrum the two will own for future data offerings hasn't been discussed, that will just add a new dimension of services down the road. |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Signal Go Down De Hole... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Heim of Ana Posts: 3,237 Phone(s): BlackBerry 8830, LG KG800 (GSM Chocolate) Provider(s): Verizon(US) Rogers(CA) Vodafone(ES) 3(HK) Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sprint's network in former HorizonPCS parts of SW Virginia | TKR | Southern US Wireless Forum | 15 | 03-18-2005 12:42 PM |
| Sprint And Nextel To Combine In Merger Of Equals | DandyDon | Wireless News | 126 | 02-02-2005 8:24 PM |
| Rivals Could Join Virgin Mobile in Renting Space on Sprint's Wireless Network | larry | Wireless News | 16 | 03-14-2004 9:01 AM |
| What phones support SMS on Sprint's network? | Tony E! | Western US Wireless Forum | 15 | 02-17-2004 8:02 PM |
| The Flaw in Sprint's Wireless Data Scheme;Insanely complex pricing could hobble its Vision network, an otherwise fine pr | Dukedog | GENERAL Wireless Discussion | 7 | 09-12-2002 5:21 PM |