Go Back   WirelessAdvisor.com Forums > Wireless Topics > Wireless News

Wireless News

|

Triton PCS, AT&T May End Branding Agreement in Wireless Topics; "Tuesday June 25, 4:38 pm Eastern Time Reuters Market News ..."




Ad Links
T-Mobile Deals
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2002, 7:11 PM     #1


Mug Winner! Shirt Winner! 

 
ComicalMoodyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 6,084
Phone(s): Blackberry 8520
Provider(s): T-Mobile
Devices: T-Mobile @Home
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Default Triton PCS, AT&T May End Branding Agreement

Tuesday June 25, 4:38 pm Eastern Time
Reuters Market News
Triton PCS, AT&T May End Branding Agreement

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Wireless telephone company Triton PCS Holdings Inc. (NYSE:TPC - News) said on Tuesday its co-branding arrangement with AT&T Corp. (NYSE:T - News) is likely to end when the deal expires in February.



"More than likely we will operate as a stand-alone brand," Daniel Hopkins, senior vice president and treasurer of Triton PCS, said at Wachovia Securities' annual equity conference in Nantucket, Massachusetts.

The company's shares closed down 51 cents, or 11.26 percent, to $4.02 in New York Stock Exchange trading.

Triton PCS is an affiliate of AT&T Wireless Services Inc. (NYSE:AWE - News), which AT&T spun off last summer. A separate five-year agreement with AT&T Wireless' former parent allows Triton PCS to mention the affiliation and include the AT&T logo, along with its own SunCom brand, in its marketing materials.

A termination of the branding deal would not affect the AT&T Wireless affiliate agreement, which includes a preferred roaming arrangement. AT&T Wireless has also agreed not to compete in Triton PCS markets.

Hopkins said AT&T must notify Triton PCS 90 days before the Feb. 4 expiration date of the branding agreement if it intends not to renew the deal.

"We've had some preliminary conversations with (AT&T)," he said. "Honestly, I have been telling people we shouldn't expect them to renew in February."

Company spokeswoman Christine Davies said a decision on the renewal has not yet been reached.


STAND-ALONE BRAND HAS ADVANTAGES

Hopkins, however, said Triton PCS is well positioned to operate as a stand-alone brand due to its investment and positioning of the SunCom name. A stand-alone brand could clear up some confusion among the company's customers, he added.

Lehman Bros. analyst John Bensche said Hopkins may just be positioning himself for future negotiations.

"Triton has always been aware that this date was coming, and it's something that they've worked carefully to preserve their bargaining power on," Bensche said. Price may be an issue, he added.

According to William Blair & Co. analyst William Benton, Triton PCS has not had to pay for the AT&T brand until now, but AT&T was asking for some payment as a condition for renewing the deal.

"It would be more advantageous for (Triton) to have the AT&T brand," Benton said.

He said the brand name is stronger than SunCom, a factor that may become important in an increasingly competitive market.

Hopkins also told investors that Triton PCS continues to see good subscriber growth. It expects to have close to 775,000 subscribers at the end of the second quarter, compared with 720,000 at the end of the first quarter. It expects to have 840,000 to 850,000 customers at the end of 2002.

Previously, Triton PCS said it expected to add 40,000 to 45,000 net new subscribers in the quarter.

Hopkins said he expects about $570 million in revenue for the full year and operating cash flow of more than $150 million.

The company expects capital expenditures of $150 million in 2002 and $220 million in 2003.


Triton PCS, AT&T May End Branding Agreement
ComicalMoodyDan has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2002, 10:58 PM     #2
Banned
 
ILUVSOCAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Redwood Valley, CA
Posts: 2,485
Phone(s): Nokia 3600(me), SE T616(me),T226(mom), Samsung SGH-x426(me), Nokia 7210(dad)
Provider(s): AT&T(Me),Cingular(Me,Mom),Edge Wireless(Dad)
Devices: BlueTrek G2 Bluetooth Headset
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

Aren't they part owned by AT&T? Edge Wireless is 40% owned by AT&T.
ILUVSOCAL has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2002, 8:10 AM Original Poster Original Poster     #3


Mug Winner! Shirt Winner! 

 
ComicalMoodyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 6,084
Phone(s): Blackberry 8520
Provider(s): T-Mobile
Devices: T-Mobile @Home
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I'm not sure ILUVSOCAL, but I actually believe they are although I can't find anything about it on the net and I looked last night. One thing I have noticed lately since my mom and grandmother has signed up for SunCom also is while my phone on the screen says "SunCom AT&T" theres just says "SunCom".

It seems like to me that SunCom (Triton PCS) is slowly trying to pull away from the AT&T logo and do things more on there own.
ComicalMoodyDan has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2002, 3:40 PM     #4

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,455
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It's always good to be able to stand on your own two feet which I am very sure they can, but like the article says, the brand name thing could come into affect in a very competitive market.
aiwapro has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2002, 4:45 PM Original Poster Original Poster     #5


Mug Winner! Shirt Winner! 

 
ComicalMoodyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 6,084
Phone(s): Blackberry 8520
Provider(s): T-Mobile
Devices: T-Mobile @Home
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I'll agree with you there I think they can stand on there own but the AT&T logo does help. That was one thing that made me try SunCom. I thought to myself hey with that AT&T logo in there they have to be a good company. I'm sure other consumer's think like that too.

By the way is it just me or have I been agreeing with you a lot today? LOL isn't that different.
ComicalMoodyDan has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2002, 4:55 PM     #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well I have to agree as well...
I think the educated cell phone shopper will not care if the AT&T logo is there, its going to be the ones that have never had a cell phone or new to a Suncom area that might hurt them....
CDANMA has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2002, 10:53 AM     #7

 
cryogenic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,443
Phone(s): Samsung A990
Provider(s): Verizon
Devices: iriver H10 6GB mp3 player
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

From the way I understand it, AT&T does not own Triton at all, it's just a marketing agreement that, as a result of their affiliation, Suncom is allowed to put the AT&T logo on their signs stating that they're a member of the AT&T network. If the agreement is not renewed, it looks like they'll still be a member of the AT&T network, but will not be able to use the name.
__________________
Firefox
My blog/pic gallery/etc
cryogenic has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2002, 11:39 AM Original Poster Original Poster     #8


Mug Winner! Shirt Winner! 

 
ComicalMoodyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 6,084
Phone(s): Blackberry 8520
Provider(s): T-Mobile
Devices: T-Mobile @Home
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I thought I read somewhere that AT&T did have a stake in Triton PCS but I can't find a damn thing on the net about it and I'm not sure at all.

You could very well be right though cryogenic as what you just said does sound right.
ComicalMoodyDan has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usGoogle BookmarksStumbleUponShare on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads for: Triton PCS, AT&T May End Branding Agreement
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T-Mobile and Triton? ACIUSRGuy Southern US Wireless Forum 7 01-28-2005 11:20 PM
Cingular and Triton get their act together bobolito Wireless News 0 09-22-2004 10:18 AM
Cingular, AT&T Settle Branding Deal jones GENERAL Wireless Discussion 17 08-25-2004 1:21 AM
Danger Announces Agreement with Triton PCS to Deliver Wireless Data Services to Consumers in the Southeast ComicalMoodyDan Wireless News 1 03-17-2003 10:47 PM
VoiceStream Continues Re-Branding Effort, Cuts Staff ComicalMoodyDan GENERAL Wireless Discussion 0 04-04-2002 3:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:09 PM.