Western US Wireless Forum|GSM or CDMA in Alaska? in U.S. Wireless Forums [Archive]; "Hi All, I'm brand new here, just trying to learn ..." | |||||||
| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Posting up a storm! Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: South Central Alaska Posts: 4 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi All, I'm brand new here, just trying to learn something because we are going to try wireless internet. As such, I have a question that I hope someone who knows something about wireless can help me with. We live on the Kenai Peninsula, south of Anchorage. We currently have cell phone service with ACS, have had for several years. We live out of town, so we don't use our cell phones very much. Around here, as soon as you get out of town, the signal goes down, and if you get even a mile or two off the main highway, the signal is usually gone completely. Standing in an upstairs window, we get reasonable cell reception on a Motorola V323i (3 bars). Start driving to town, and you lose it on the first downhill. We also have ACS dialup internet, and it's slow, very slow. 26-28 kbps. Getting kicked offline is common. So we're looking into wireless internet. We talked to both ACS and GCI ( they use Cellular One), and tried out the Sierra Wireless 860 aircard with GCI's Cellular One network. It worked pretty well, again, upstairs, and should I mention we have metal siding? Cross country, we're about 2.5 miles from the highway, which is where everybody concentrates their cell coverage, as far as I know. Question: given these circumstances, any ideas on which would be better, GCI/Cellular One's GSM system, or ACS's CDMA system? Thanks for any help on this! |
| |
| | #2 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: California Posts: 91 Phone(s): Vertu Ascent Ti Knurled, Samsung A795, Iridium 9505A Provider(s): VZW, T-Mobile, Iridium Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ACS's CDMA system is better in my opinion. I have visited Alaska a few times going as far north as Prudhoe Bay down to Kennicott, southwest to Katmai and places in between. From my experience I would say that the CDMA system is more mature and provides more comprehensive coverage as limited as it is in Alaska. I only tried using the data side in Anchorage and Copper Center and for the most part it was pretty good for checking email and a little web surfing. |
| |
| | #3 |
| Join Date: May 2003 Location: Old San Juan, Puerto Rico Posts: 10,290 Phone(s): Motorola Droid, BlackBerry Tour, Samsung Omnia II Provider(s): VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 130 |
I agree. I have heard that ACS is the way to go up there. I would suggest looking at a repeater option or external antenna, that could increase your signal tremendously and even make the wireless internet faster and more reliable as well as give you cell coverage throughout your home.
|
| |
| | #4 |
| Software Architect Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 1,611 Phone(s): Blackberry Pearl, Samsung Katalyst Provider(s): Verizon Devices: Moto H700, Dell Inspirion 1521, LT-20 GPS Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 4 |
I would hold off changing, GCI right now is scrambling now that AT&T is buying CellularOne. As a former GCI employee, I can say with all honesty, ACS is a bit more prevalent in the Kenai/Soldotna area, but I honestly believe that GCI's scramble will be a big thing and soon. Also keep in mind GCI owns majority of Alaska DigiTel, which would be another CDMA alternative. If GCI cable service is available for you (and I know it's all over the peninsula so there's a chance) then you have Internet and cheap long distance phone there, keep that in mind. Good Luck, Shawn
__________________ Heav'n has no Rage like Love to Hatred turn'd, Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd. ![]() |
| |
| | #5 |
| Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Phila area Posts: 1,569 Phone(s): LG 6100, LG 5200, LG vx 10 Provider(s): VZw Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
Given the weather potential and wilderness coverage (out of town) did you ever consider trying Iridium for a back up.
__________________ Phones before cellular existed ( IMTS) car phones; 1977, Motorola Pulsar 1, (with a dial) 1982 Motorola Pulsar 2. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Software Architect Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 1,611 Phone(s): Blackberry Pearl, Samsung Katalyst Provider(s): Verizon Devices: Moto H700, Dell Inspirion 1521, LT-20 GPS Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 4 |
The kenai peninsula (where the OP resides) isn't that "out" of town for alaska, at least not to where they should need a sat phone. I'm willing to guarantee that the op has a landline either through GCI or ACS (GCI leases traditional copper lines from acs to provide the state with local phone service when it's own coax network isn't available.) You know, come to think of it, a repeater/signal amplifier should work for the OP in home for cellular service. That maybe an option to look into, the wireless amplifiers aren't that expensive and they could pick up the signal upstairs and rebroadcast throughout the house, they're fairly expensive in comparison to the phones 200 - 500 dollars, but it might be a decent investment if you're looking into getting a wireless internet access card through CellOne/AT&T (if you're going that route, trust me, keep GCI out of it, makes for less headaches if something goes wrong)
__________________ Heav'n has no Rage like Love to Hatred turn'd, Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd. ![]() |
| |
| | #7 | |
| Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Phila area Posts: 1,569 Phone(s): LG 6100, LG 5200, LG vx 10 Provider(s): VZw Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
__________________ Phones before cellular existed ( IMTS) car phones; 1977, Motorola Pulsar 1, (with a dial) 1982 Motorola Pulsar 2. | |
| |
| | #8 |
| Gearhead/Gadget freak Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Bye Bye MN, Hello Cali Posts: 890 Phone(s): BB 9550, LG enV2, Retired: BB Curve, Moto Z6tv, E815,V710, Nokia 3285, Nokia 6185 Provider(s): Verizon on both phones Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 1 |
Something I haven't seen brought up here, but what types of data does each network have available? I'm assuming the CDMA is 1X, which will give about 90 to 100K download speeds. What about the GSM, is it EDGE? if not, isn't GSM data 14.4K speeds?
__________________ Cars became my job, so phones became my hobby. |
| |
| | #9 | |
| .:|Always Covered|:. Join Date: May 2005 Location: BVR Posts: 1,796 Phone(s): Blackberry 8230, KRZR K1m, SLVR L6, v710, E815, E816(ampd), LG 380, 8600 Provider(s): Alltel, T-Mobile, Sprint, Centennial Devices: Garmin eTrex Vista Cx, Bluetooth headset Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
qnc is the same for gsm and original cdma at 14.4.........
__________________ www.ALLTELLIVES.com My words of wisdom and random thoughts....Doesn't matter how many people are on a network, you can only use one phone at a time...ok maybe two... Last edited by strunke; 10-21-2007 at 6:21 PM. | |
| |
| | #10 | |
| Powered by HTC FUZE Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Everywhere. Posts: 1,263 Phone(s): Nokia 6103, 6010, 2260, HTC FUZE, HTC TILT, Nokia 6682, 6085, to many phones Provider(s): The death star formally known as Cell One. Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 6 | Quote:
They both peak out around 300K. GSM uses bursting technology so your not always at 300K and only peaks when the subscriber needs it and it is like Cable the more people the slower it is. CDMA 1X is more efficient with its backhaul so more people can be on it. GPRS is slow and will make you mad. Its faster than dial up thou at a max of a guestimated 128K (similiar to ISDN). If you just web browse its not bad. I cant speak from experience but from reading around the net Cellone in Alaska has the largest Network assests (towers) from buying a few companies and traded the old AT&T all of its Alaska towers for the small market Cell One used to have in California. Cell One may have more towers but that doesnt mean the coverage is where you need it. CDMA 1X is easier to update than that of UMTS which a completely different network technology. Last edited by RadioFoneGuy; 10-21-2007 at 9:56 PM. Reason: addition | |
| |
| | #11 | |
| Software Architect Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 1,611 Phone(s): Blackberry Pearl, Samsung Katalyst Provider(s): Verizon Devices: Moto H700, Dell Inspirion 1521, LT-20 GPS Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 4 | Quote:
But I know form experience cellone and the other carriers in AK are sparse at best when it comes to the peninsula, keep in mind at least 90% of the subs are clustered in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau, and the North Slope.
__________________ Heav'n has no Rage like Love to Hatred turn'd, Nor Hell a Fury, like a Woman scorn'd. ![]() | |
| |
| | Original Poster
#12 |
| Posting up a storm! Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: South Central Alaska Posts: 4 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Wow, thanks for all the responses, everybody! I have to say, you guys are a wealth of information. Just to clarify, cell phone coverage is not really the issue, what we're looking for is faster internet at home. We're trying out the cards in our laptop but it's our home computers we wanted faster. We have ACS landline phone service (and cell service), but I would say the chances of getting cable right here are low. There are scattered houses, 1/4 mile or so apart. We live about 15 miles out of Soldotna and get good cell reception outside the house and upstairs by a window, but zero inside, on the first floor. (We have considered Iridium for extended backcountry hiking and hunting, but haven't checked in to it yet. It's expensive, isn't it?) We had tried out GCI's (GSM)card for a week. (both companies let you do this for minimal cost, so we're planning on trying out ACS's card this week) Here's how the GSM card did: It definitely works in "bursts". Here at the house, performance really depended on where we had the laptop. In the living room= nothing. Upstairs, by a window= pretty good, generally 50-100 kbps, sometimes higher. We took the laptop to Anchorage with us, and the burst tech is really obvious, even there. We didn't know that was how it worked, and wondered why the rate fluctuated so much ( we spent a lot of time just watching the "Statistics" page of the software) so thank you for that info. In Anchorage we got speeds up to 200 kbps. Coming south out of Anchorage it worked pretty well until sometime up around Turnagain Arm. Then it went to zippo. We also took the laptop on a drive down to Homer, at the southern tip of the Kenai Peninsula. On the way down, it worked almost all the way, much better on the hills, and going down when you went down in a low spot. I think it gave out completely about 10-15 miles north of Homer. I t worked again in Homer, and out on the Homer Spit, but the rate fluctuated a lot. Overall, compared to our dial-up landline, it was fast !!! Regarding cell phones, we have ACS service. We got a new phone this summer, about when they went to CDMA. I don't know if it's the CDMA or the new phone, but reception is a whole lot better than it used to be. I checked it constantly the last week, as I drove around. In town (Soldotna and Kenai) it's great. Along the highway towards Anchorage, it's still good, and even off away from the hiway a couple miles, it's much better than it was last year. I got 2-3- bars in places I got no service before. I did run out of service when I was driving through the mountains, but FYI, there's great reception in Cooper Landing, which is right down in the mountains, because there's a cell site right there somewhere. A couple years ago, when I got my Nokia, I ran the battery completely down on it multiple times in the first week, just because I'd leave it on, and when I was out of digital, it'd switch to analog, and the battery would drop like a rock. That's when I got in the habit of only turning it on in town..... with CDMA and a Motorola, I can leave it on all the way home. |
| |
| | Original Poster
#13 |
| Posting up a storm! Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: South Central Alaska Posts: 4 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Also, as a sidenote. It's difficult getting information about wireless internet around here, even in Anchorage. ESPECIALLY in Anchorage. We were just looking for info on antennae and an adapter for the desktop PC, and only found two guys, (one on the Geek Squad at Best Buy, the other at Comp USA) who even knew what we were talking about. The others had absolutely no clue; even at Frigid North if you know of them, they're an electronics place that generally has just what you need! No place in Anchorage had a PCMCIA- PCI adapter. Frigid North (isn't that a GREAT name!) had antenna equipment, but the guy didn't know if they even work for this application. |
| |
| | Original Poster
#14 |
| Posting up a storm! Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: South Central Alaska Posts: 4 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
: |
| |
| | #15 |
| Gearhead/Gadget freak Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Bye Bye MN, Hello Cali Posts: 890 Phone(s): BB 9550, LG enV2, Retired: BB Curve, Moto Z6tv, E815,V710, Nokia 3285, Nokia 6185 Provider(s): Verizon on both phones Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 1 | That's what it used to be down here, now all the carriers are $60 per month. One thing you might want to look at is the kind of device I have, a USB modem instead of a PCMCIA card. That way you can easily attach it to a notebook or a desktop. Plus, with a USB cradle or extension cord you can move it around if reception is an issue. Looking at ACS's website they don't even list what devices they sell for mobile internet, so I don't know if that will be an option for you or not.
__________________ Cars became my job, so phones became my hobby. |
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Alaska Communications shutting down TDMA on September 30th going CDMA | Fire14 | Western US Wireless Forum | 1 | 09-07-2007 8:16 PM |
| Alaska gets expanded CDMA coverage | Fire14 | Wireless News | 0 | 09-26-2006 8:36 AM |
| Alaska Cdma | agentHibby | Western US Wireless Forum | 8 | 12-16-2005 9:07 PM |
| Alaska gets CDMA network | ShoresGuy | Wireless News | 10 | 03-29-2004 11:04 PM |
| Alaska DigiTel CDMA coverage - Anchorage/Mat-Su/Fairbanks | TProphet | Western US Wireless Forum | 4 | 07-12-2003 1:22 AM |