| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Go Angels! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,379
Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 29
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Images: 154 |
Council approves construction of 2 100-foot towers By Aaron Burgin, The Porterville Recorder Despite opposition from one of the city's prominent business owners and a level of reluctance from the City Council about two 100-foot cell phone towers emerging inside city limits, council members approved the erection of the towers by separate 3-2 votes Tuesday. The votes capped a three-month debate surrounding the appropriate placement of cell phone towers in the community, which nearly resulted in a moratorium on tower construction in September. “For a second there, I didn't know what was going to happen,” said Jamie Strachan, a site acquisition specialist for Sprint affiliate UbiquiTel. “There were some nervous moments, but now we have to get to work.” The 102-foot UbiquiTel tower will be erected behind Clevenger Ford, just west of Main Street. Ridge Communications, affiliated with Verizon Wireless, will construct its 100-foot tower behind Fire Station No. 2 east of Newcomb Street. The narrow approval was preceded by a 30-minute debate among council members as to what type of precedent they would set by allowing a 102-foot, co-locatable communication tower in the heart of the city, and was the cell phone tower worth potentially souring relations with local business stalwart Truman “Tex” Clevenger, who threatened to move the Clevenger Ford dealership outside of the city limits if the council allowed construction of the tower behind his business. Clevenger, whose dealership has operated in the city for 35 years, expressed concerns that a cell phone tower might interfere with his company's satellite connection with Ford Motor Co. in Detroit, which sends the dealership daily sales statistics each morning. He also argued that his business, which generates sales tax revenue each year for the city, meant more to the city than a “big, ugly tower” that doesn't generate revenue. “I spend a lot of money and taxes in the city,” Clevenger said. “How much does a tower pay a city in taxes? “I have a friend in the county, who would buy me out and move my business to the county in a heartbeat,” he said as he returned to his seat in the audience. Mayor Pro-tem Cameron Hamilton and Councilman Ron Irish, who cast dissenting votes for both projects, said they were concerned that UbiquiTel's application left no room for aesthetic improvements, including natural or artificial camouflage that has become increasingly popular nationwide. Strachan said since the tower was 102-feet tall, and able to service three additional carriers as a result, very little could be done to disguise it from plain view. He also said that because of Federal Communication Commission regulations, interference with Clevenger's satellite would be “highly unlikely, if not impossible.” Also, the project, Strachan said, was time sensitive: construction on the tower needed to begin prior to January 2006, or the company would lose project funding for the second time in almost three years. At least one council member said he wanted to attract new business to the city, but not at the expense of a business that helped “build the city.” City Attorney Julia Lew quickly interjected that council members were traversing shaky ground if they were to deny an application based on preference to another business. Lew said during a council recess that council decisions cannot be made because a business has strong ties to the community, because the same rationale would have to be applied to all businesses. Mayor Kelly West admonished the other council members that UbiquiTel had “jumped through every hoop” to get to this point in the process, and their business - which would provide better cell phone reception within the city limits - should not be denied based on Clevenger's legacy in the city. “It just wouldn't be fair for us to deny them after all they had been through,” West said. UbiquiTel's first attempt to bring the tower to the city was approved by a different council in January 2003, but their conditional use permit elapsed while waiting for the necessary funding. After a short break, the council quickly approved Ridge Communications' application with little conversation, by the same 3-2 margin. But council members said the debate is not over: the Community Development Department is currently drafting an ordinance that would regulate cell phone tower construction citywide, Hamilton said. “We need to come up with an idea of what we want to do,” Hamilton said. “Do we want to have a lot of shorter towers, like in Los Angeles, or a few tall ones. “I think the most important thing is appearance of the tower,” Hamilton said. Contact Aaron Burgin at 784-5000, Ext. 1047, or aburgin@portervillerecorder.com. This story was published in The Porterville Recorder on Nov. 5, 2005 The Porterville Recorder • P.O. Box 151 • Porterville, CA 93258 • 559-784-5000 http://www.portervillerecorder.com/a...tate/news5.txt |
| |
| | #2 |
| Join Date: May 2003 Location: Campione, Italy Posts: 10,290
Phone(s): Blackberry Tour, Motorola RAZR V3i Provider(s): VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 130 |
Wow, I'm surprised this was passed/approved!
|
| |
| | #3 |
| \/\/ireless /\dvisor Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: City of /\ngels CA. Posts: 10,102
Phone(s): KR/\ZR K1·/\/\OTO i880, BBCURVE 8350i Provider(s): ·T···Mobile·Sprint/Nextel Devices: /\/\otoH12·/\/\otoH690 Thanks: 3
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Images: 19 |
Sprint usually gets their towers approved....
|
| |
| | Original Poster
#4 | |
| Go Angels! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,379
Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 29
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Images: 154 | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #5 |
| Fresh Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Fresno, CA Posts: 18
Phone(s): Treo650, Sanyo MM-5600 Provider(s): Sprint Devices: PDA Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well, from what I am hearing, Ubiquitel will be out of the area by sometime early next year. I have heard, from a source, that the court date for Ubiquitel Vs. Sprint Nextel is December 19th, and on or near that date, Sprint Nextel will announce they are buying all of the Ubiquitel Market. Guess we will all be corporate market before we know it! JT |
| |
| | Original Poster
#6 | |
| Go Angels! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,379
Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 29
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Images: 154 | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Original Poster
#7 |
| Go Angels! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,379
Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 29
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Images: 154 |
Just an update. The Sprint/Ubiquitel tower is just about finished and should be on in a couple of weeks. I'm hoping to get up there and take some pics.
|
| |
| | #8 | |
| Sprint is the BOMB! Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Laguna Niguel, CA Posts: 283
Phone(s): Blackberry 8830, Sanyo Katana Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Sprint RULES and provides the best service, plans, and phones! Quote:
| |
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LONG Delay/Problems | Shizam76 | The WirelessAdvisor Community | 23 | 09-17-2004 3:17 AM |
| How most towers look like on Long Island, NY | Yankees368 | Northeastern US Wireless Forum | 10 | 06-24-2004 4:34 PM |
| (very long)Conclusion to the I need a new phone for my sprint plan. It long but wanted to give everyone the complete sto | 62Fuelie | Northeastern US Wireless Forum | 4 | 02-16-2004 9:42 PM |
| Verizon or Sprint in Long Island Nassau area? | Kennyxnyc | Northeastern US Wireless Forum | 11 | 09-17-2003 11:49 AM |
| 3G technology sprint is using is approved! | IdiOTeQnoLogY | GENERAL Wireless Discussion | 0 | 06-05-2002 6:20 PM |