Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix
I was messing around with T-Mobile 's coverage locator and I found a weird mess of coverage west of Phoenix. Its ...
- 10-28-2005, 12:53 PM #1Quase Três Anos Com WA!
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Higienópolis, São Paulo
- Posts
- 2,233
- Phone(s)
- Motorola E398
- Provider(s)
- TIM Brasil
- Devices
- Palm Tungsten E2, iPod, Presario V2311, HS850
Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix I was messing around with T-Mobile
's coverage locator and I found a weird mess of coverage west of Phoenix. Its like a big cicle with mixed amounts of coverage in it. Why is it like that? I attached a screen shot. Sem fronteiras... esse é como eu quero morar minha vida.
- 10-28-2005, 5:03 PM #2
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 10,292
- Phone(s)
- HTC Thunderbolt
- HTC Droid Incredible 2
- Provider(s)
- VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
- Likes
- 7
- Images
- 130
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix It might be a boomer on top of a mountain spreading the signal like that?
This looks somewhat similar of my area.
- 10-28-2005, 5:18 PM #3Quase Três Anos Com WA!
Threadstarter
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Higienópolis, São Paulo
- Posts
- 2,233
- Phone(s)
- Motorola E398
- Provider(s)
- TIM Brasil
- Devices
- Palm Tungsten E2, iPod, Presario V2311, HS850
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Yea you have a couple of them dont ya? But why is the signal restricted to a circle?
Sem fronteiras... esse é como eu quero morar minha vida.
- 10-28-2005, 5:55 PM #4
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 10,292
- Phone(s)
- HTC Thunderbolt
- HTC Droid Incredible 2
- Provider(s)
- VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
- Likes
- 7
- Images
- 130
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix I have no idea. The only explanation I can come up with is that the signal is boosted into those directions from a very powerful tower that's high up in altitude.
- 10-29-2005, 12:03 AM #5Wireless Consultant
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Denver
- Posts
- 1,404
- Phone(s)
- Motorola
- Nokia
- Provider(s)
- Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint
- Likes
- 6
- Images
- 2
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix The circle may be the extent that the signal is reliable for that site, even if there is sufficient strength beyond. So far, the most impressive I have seen is the huge dark green half-circle radiating from what appears to be Pike's Peak. Enter "Fountain, CO" as your city, and behold. And the signal improves as you travel away from the mountain, typical of a very high site...14,200 feet!
Originally Posted by Andy84094
- 10-29-2005, 12:09 AM #6Go Lakers!
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Orange County, CA
- Posts
- 13,709
- Phone(s)
- LG Optimus G
- Provider(s)
- Sprint
- Likes
- 44
- Images
- 166
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix That circle of coverage is kind of odd. I noticed some weird things like that on T-Mobile
's So. cal maps as well. They have one rural part of Riverside County showing a huge amount of coverage in an unpopulated mountainous area that I know they can't really be covering that well. Last edited by larry; 10-29-2005 at 3:37 AM.
- 10-29-2005, 1:13 AM #7In Memoriam
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Sandy Springs, GA
- Posts
- 1,749
- Phone(s)
- Palm Treo 680
- Sierra AirCard 860
- Moto L2 & L6
- Nokia 6015i
- Provider(s)
- lots of orange, a little Little Rock blue
- Devices
- way too many :)
- Images
- 2
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix The map probably takes into account the 35 km distance limitation of GSM.
Originally Posted by Gideon H 
-SC"Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today. There might be a law against it by that time." -/usr/games/fortune
sticking it out at you...
- 10-29-2005, 12:53 PM #8Quase Três Anos Com WA!
Threadstarter
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Higienópolis, São Paulo
- Posts
- 2,233
- Phone(s)
- Motorola E398
- Provider(s)
- TIM Brasil
- Devices
- Palm Tungsten E2, iPod, Presario V2311, HS850
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Wow that's interesting. So I guess these are results of towers on top of mountains... I remember seeing them a lot in the distance when I lived in Phoenix so I guess that is why they show-up like that!
Originally Posted by BillRadio Sem fronteiras... esse é como eu quero morar minha vida.
- 10-29-2005, 8:20 PM #9The Cell Phone Junkie
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Cave Creek, AZ
- Posts
- 3,046
- Phone(s)
- iPhone 3GS
- Blackberry Curve 8530
- Treo Pro
- HTC Diamond
- Provider(s)
- ATT, Verizon, Sprint |Prior: Alltel, Nextel
- Devices
- Acura GPS, iPAQ rx3100, Bluetooth
- Likes
- 13
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Very cool! I have noticed that on a lot of the coverage map for T-Mobile
Originally Posted by BillRadio
in the western states. It would figure Bill's answer makes sense...
- 10-30-2005, 11:20 AM #10
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 10,292
- Phone(s)
- HTC Thunderbolt
- HTC Droid Incredible 2
- Provider(s)
- VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
- Likes
- 7
- Images
- 130
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Seems like T-Mobile
Originally Posted by BillRadio
leaves out the west sectors from that specific tower...is that just unpopulated backcountry then?
- 10-31-2005, 12:46 AM #11Wireless Consultant
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Denver
- Posts
- 1,404
- Phone(s)
- Motorola
- Nokia
- Provider(s)
- Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint
- Likes
- 6
- Images
- 2
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix If the site is on the top of this mountain, the western half of Colorado Springs would be in the shadow of the mountain and would not be able to see the site. Also, the signal would be directed toward the horizon which means locations a mile below the narrow beam width would not get a usuable signal. So, on the west side of town, normal cell sites fill in.
Originally Posted by Andy84094
The areas with no coverage are not populated enough to justify even adding an additional sector. You'll also notice there is no coverage spot for where the actual cell site would be located...it's hard to get there.
I concur with Roamer1 that the edge of these circles are at about the 35 km limit of useful GSM coverage. I was just astounded that the Colorado Springs coverage within this circle is all dark green.
Also, I am guessing that this T-Mobile
site is really on top of Cheyenne Mountain which has a slightly better "view" of Colorado Springs. That's where all the TV towers are, and good power
, mounting locations and access would be available. Still, a very high site, and yes, that is the mountain under which NORAD headquarters is buried.
- 11-01-2005, 8:25 PM #12
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 10,292
- Phone(s)
- HTC Thunderbolt
- HTC Droid Incredible 2
- Provider(s)
- VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
- Likes
- 7
- Images
- 130
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Is there a lot of outdoor activities held in the areas where there is no sector pointing to it? If so, then it would make a lot of people happy to have a usable signal in the area, and really wouldn't cost T-Mobile anything to add another sector(...it doesn't really cost a lot other than the equipment, correct?). That's one thing VZW
does on some sites in rural areas here. They do add that additional sector to give coverage to places where you usually don't find a lot of people, but if you go out there for outdoor activities, people are happy their phones work.
- 11-03-2005, 1:26 AM #13Wireless Consultant
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Denver
- Posts
- 1,404
- Phone(s)
- Motorola
- Nokia
- Provider(s)
- Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint
- Likes
- 6
- Images
- 2
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix No, there isn't much there, not even roads. If it is indeed on Cheyenne Mountain, which is just in front of Pike's Peak, the signal would just be directed into solid granite.
Originally Posted by Andy84094 Rural VerizonThat's one thing VZW does on some sites in rural areas here. They do add that additional sector to give coverage to places where you usually don't find a lot of people, but if you go out there for outdoor activities, people are happy their phones work.
sites, even those built here in the past year, have omni-directional, or only slightly-directional antennas (non-sectorized), so they cover all around the site...something T-Mobile can't do.
- 11-04-2005, 11:06 PM #14
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 10,292
- Phone(s)
- HTC Thunderbolt
- HTC Droid Incredible 2
- Provider(s)
- VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
- Likes
- 7
- Images
- 130
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Sorry if this is a dumb question...but why not?
Originally Posted by BillRadio
- 11-05-2005, 2:01 PM #15Wireless Consultant
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Denver
- Posts
- 1,404
- Phone(s)
- Motorola
- Nokia
- Provider(s)
- Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint
- Likes
- 6
- Images
- 2
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix The way PCS carriers can radiate a useful signal is to concentrate the signal with a directional antenna. Typically, a PCS transmitter radiates 8, and in some cases 16 watts, whereas a Cellular transmitter can have as much as 500 watts. To make such low PCS power
Originally Posted by Andy84094
levels work, the antenna must 'focus' the signal in both the horizontal and vertical planes, realizing as much as a 10- to 15-times virtual power 'increase'.
So, a PCS signal can be almost as powerful as a cellular signal, but only in a concentrated spot.
There are omnidirectional PCS antennas. They are used along roads where the only use of the signal is among drivers. Sprint
has dozens of them along the roads that cross the Santa Monica Mountains in CA. I can measure the range of each of these antennas at about .7 mile, maximum. That kind of range would not be worth the cost of a full site, but does offer a reasonably-priced alternative in areas where even a directional antenna would not cover a radius beyond a half mile due to line-of-sight limitations on those curvy roads. Last edited by BillRadio; 11-05-2005 at 2:29 PM.
- 11-06-2005, 1:20 AM #16
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 10,292
- Phone(s)
- HTC Thunderbolt
- HTC Droid Incredible 2
- Provider(s)
- VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
- Likes
- 7
- Images
- 130
Re: Odd coverage map: West of Phoenix Very interesting, Bill. I did not know that. So bottom line is that 800 carriers don't only have better penetration because of the lower frequency, but also because they are able to use more power
on their sites, correct?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report
By M in LA in forum Western US Wireless ForumReplies: 19Last Post: 10-02-2005, 2:25 PM -
Best Coverage for Phoenix Metro Area???
By WiggyFife in forum Western US Wireless ForumReplies: 29Last Post: 06-23-2003, 9:31 AM -
Phoenix Coverage--Sprint+Verizon
By Airb330 in forum Western US Wireless ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 02-24-2003, 1:11 AM -
AT&T GSM Coverage in Phoenix Metro Area???
By gpf590 in forum Western US Wireless ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 01-10-2003, 2:03 PM -
Sprint coverage report from LA to Phoenix on I-10
By larry in forum Western US Wireless ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 09-05-2002, 12:36 PM



Auctions


There are so many companies manufacturing smartphone......as a consumer i...
So many smart phones in the...