Go Back   WirelessAdvisor.com Forums > Regional Wireless Forums [Archive] > U.S. Wireless Forums [Archive] > Western US Wireless Forum

Western US Wireless Forum | Subject: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report in U.S. Wireless Forums [Archive]; Well I'm back home is Southern California. Had a great time in Arizona, especially meeting Wiggy! Now for the coverage ...

Western US Wireless Forum Wireless phone services in the Western US (States: AK,AZ,CA,CO,HI,ID,MT,NV,NM,OR,UT,WA,WY)


Ad Links
T-Mobile Deals
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2005, 2:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
Long Term Evolution 4G
 
Mobile Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,743
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T
Thanks: 46
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Default Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Well I'm back home is Southern California. Had a great time in Arizona, especially meeting Wiggy!

Now for the coverage report. As I alluded to in a different thread, there were some big surprises in the coverage levels of the different carriers in the Phoenix area. I was specifically in the Gilbert/Higley, Queen Creek, and Chandler areas. This area can be a black hole for some carriers. Here is what I discovered:

Verizon Wireless - Coverage was good to great depending on where I was. While staying at relative's houses in Higley/Queen Creek I had about 1 to 2 bars. Good enough to make calls, but there was a dropped call. It happened to be when I was talking to Wiggy. In other areas, the signal was full bars. This was seen in Ahwatukee/South Mountain, Downtown Phoenix, Glendale/Peoria, and Tempe. Most of Gilbert and Chandler were very strong as well. Overall a 4 out of 5.

T-Mobile - This was the biggest surprise. T-Mobile was the ONLY carrier with FULL SERVICE everywhere I travelled. Yes, there were signal fluctuations, but is was always very strong. Apparently the T-Mobile network is excellent in the Southeast Phoenix area. Inside my realtive's home, service was always full bars. When Wiggy and I drove through the different communities (those I mentioned in the VZW review), the signal was always full. I was stunned!! . Overall a 5 out of 5. Wow! I didn't expect this. EDGE service was up in SE Phoenix, but not at the airport.

Cingular - I don't have Cingular service, but my relatives did. Signal was weak. Mostly 1 to 2 bars at their house. Only when we forced their phones to the T-Mobile network did we see full service. Cingular is particularly weak in Higley/Queen Creek. Overall 2 out of 5 (this was how my relatives with Cingular felt, not me).

Sprint - One cousin of mine has Sprint, and it suffered the same as Verizon. One to two bars. I don't have Sprint, so I cannot give a more detailed review.

Alltel is an incumbant carrier in the Phoenix area, but no one I know has their service. I was able to purchase a V710 case at an Alltel store, so that worked out well.

No one I know has Nextel either, so I cannot give a coverage report for them either.

So there you go. This is what I experienced while in Phoenix. T-Mobile was the biggest, and most pleasant, surprise. WiggyFife can concur with a majority of my experiences considering he was a witness to the phone's readings. I had a great time even though it was over 100 degrees every day I was there. I plan on going back soon, maybe permanently...
__________________
(1994-Present) LG Voyager
at&t (2004-2005, 2006-Present) Nokia 6555 3G

Mobile Mike no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-28-2005, 3:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
still knows nothing!!!
 
WiggyFife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 4,318
Phone(s): LG VX8700
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless
Devices: HP Laptop, Palm T|X, iPod, Toyota Camry BT.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Awesome write-up, lbMike!!! I concur w/ all you said, & I did see it for myself.

That call that dropped that lb was referring to was sincerely a fluke though!!! For those who care, it was at the intersection of Alma School & Queen Creek, outside the Target Store. It really never happened before. It just figures it would hapeen whilst 1 cell phone aficianado talks to another cell phone aficianado from a Wireless forum!!!

It musta been rigged, I tell you!!!
WiggyFife no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-28-2005, 3:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
Go Angels!
 
larry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 12,949
Phone(s): LG Rumor
Provider(s): Sprint
Thanks: 17
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Images: 146
146 Images


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Remember that you can't go by just how many signal bars were showing. Each phone and manufacturer calibrates differently. One phone might continue to show full bars until -90 dbs while another might only show full bars until -75 dbs. Other factors such as EC/IO can be more important.
larry no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-28-2005, 3:49 AM   #4 (permalink)
Long Term Evolution 4G
 
Mobile Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,743
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T
Thanks: 46
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by larry
Remember that you can't go by just how many signal bars were showing. Each phone and manufacturer calibrates differently. One phone might continue to show full bars until -90 dbs while another might only show full bars until -75 dbs. Other factors such as EC/IO can be more important.
Larry, I can't disagree with you. I've never gone into the actual signal parameter mode on any of my phones. Also, I've never gotten into the super techical aspect of signal flux and dbs levels.

What I can say is that for the average "joe" who bases coverage on how many bars he sees on his phone, it was evident who was the strongest. My report, though, is not meant to be the authority on who is the best in the Phoenix area, just what I experienced when I was out there.
__________________
(1994-Present) LG Voyager
at&t (2004-2005, 2006-Present) Nokia 6555 3G

Mobile Mike no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-29-2005, 5:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
The Cell Phone Junkie
 
azcellphonejunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cave Creek, AZ
Posts: 2,828
Phone(s): Treo 750, HTC Diamond, BB Pearl, iPhone
Provider(s): ATT|Prior: SPCS, Alltel, T-Mble, Nextel, Verizon
Devices: Acura GPS, iPAQ rx3100, Bluetooth
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbmike212
Well I'm back home is Southern California. Had a great time in Arizona, especially meeting Wiggy!

Now for the coverage report. As I alluded to in a different thread, there were some big surprises in the coverage levels of the different carriers in the Phoenix area. I was specifically in the Gilbert/Higley, Queen Creek, and Chandler areas. This area can be a black hole for some carriers. Here is what I discovered:

Verizon Wireless - Coverage was good to great depending on where I was. While staying at relative's houses in Higley/Queen Creek I had about 1 to 2 bars. Good enough to make calls, but there was a dropped call. It happened to be when I was talking to Wiggy. In other areas, the signal was full bars. This was seen in Ahwatukee/South Mountain, Downtown Phoenix, Glendale/Peoria, and Tempe. Most of Gilbert and Chandler were very strong as well. Overall a 4 out of 5.

T-Mobile - This was the biggest surprise. T-Mobile was the ONLY carrier with FULL SERVICE everywhere I travelled. Yes, there were signal fluctuations, but is was always very strong. Apparently the T-Mobile network is excellent in the Southeast Phoenix area. Inside my realtive's home, service was always full bars. When Wiggy and I drove through the different communities (those I mentioned in the VZW review), the signal was always full. I was stunned!! . Overall a 5 out of 5. Wow! I didn't expect this. EDGE service was up in SE Phoenix, but not at the airport.

Cingular - I don't have Cingular service, but my relatives did. Signal was weak. Mostly 1 to 2 bars at their house. Only when we forced their phones to the T-Mobile network did we see full service. Cingular is particularly weak in Higley/Queen Creek. Overall 2 out of 5 (this was how my relatives with Cingular felt, not me).

Sprint - One cousin of mine has Sprint, and it suffered the same as Verizon. One to two bars. I don't have Sprint, so I cannot give a more detailed review.

Alltel is an incumbant carrier in the Phoenix area, but no one I know has their service. I was able to purchase a V710 case at an Alltel store, so that worked out well.

No one I know has Nextel either, so I cannot give a coverage report for them either.

So there you go. This is what I experienced while in Phoenix. T-Mobile was the biggest, and most pleasant, surprise. WiggyFife can concur with a majority of my experiences considering he was a witness to the phone's readings. I had a great time even though it was over 100 degrees every day I was there. I plan on going back soon, maybe permanently...
Great report, very infromative. Thanks!

On cingular's behalf, I can tell you that I don't have any issues with them here in Phoenix. I love the service, one of the best, most reliable ones I have used to date...
azcellphonejunkie no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-29-2005, 6:00 PM   #6 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Campione, Italy
Posts: 10,285
Phone(s): HTC 6900 Touch, Motorola RAZR V3i
Provider(s): VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 130
130 Images
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbmike212
Larry, I can't disagree with you. I've never gone into the actual signal parameter mode on any of my phones. Also, I've never gotten into the super techical aspect of signal flux and dbs levels.

What I can say is that for the average "joe" who bases coverage on how many bars he sees on his phone, it was evident who was the strongest. My report, though, is not meant to be the authority on who is the best in the Phoenix area, just what I experienced when I was out there.

So say the average Joe has a Sprint LG and Samsung phone. The Samsung will show full service when the LG has no bars. Which one is more accurate? The LG, but the average Joe will think the Samsung phone either works much better, or if they are comparing a Samsung Sprint against, say a Verizon, that Sprint is much better. I have personal experiences with Samsung vs. LG on Sprint.
Andy no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 12:31 AM   #7 (permalink)

 
jimwayda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 255
Phone(s): Sanyo MM-7400
Provider(s): Sprint
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Signal Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

One or two Sprint bars on one of the newer Sprint phones is as good as four to five over-inflated Verizon bars. Verizon is very liberal with the bar displays on the phones that they sell. You really cannot go by the bars and need to put the phone into test mode and read the DB level. I have done this test with a Sanyo 7400 on Sprint and a LG 6100 on Verizon and came to the aforementioned conclusion. YMMV may vary with different phones, but typically Verizon LG and Motorola phones have inflated signal meters. Notice all of the Verizon bars on the title of my message.

-jim


Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy84094
So say the average Joe has a Sprint LG and Samsung phone. The Samsung will show full service when the LG has no bars. Which one is more accurate? The LG, but the average Joe will think the Samsung phone either works much better, or if they are comparing a Samsung Sprint against, say a Verizon, that Sprint is much better. I have personal experiences with Samsung vs. LG on Sprint.
jimwayda no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 12:40 AM   #8 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Campione, Italy
Posts: 10,285
Phone(s): HTC 6900 Touch, Motorola RAZR V3i
Provider(s): VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 130
130 Images
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimwayda
One or two Sprint bars on one of the newer Sprint phones is as good as four to five over-inflated Verizon bars. Verizon is very liberal with the bar displays on the phones that they sell. You really cannot go by the bars and need to put the phone into test mode and read the DB level. I have done this test with a Sanyo 7400 on Sprint and a LG 6100 on Verizon and came to the aforementioned conclusion. YMMV may vary with different phones, but typically Verizon LG and Motorola phones have inflated signal meters. Notice all of the Verizon bars on the title of my message.

-jim
Jim,
If it's your opinion that Verizon oferinflates their phones to overstate signals, then that's your opinion and it's fine. I have not experienced that, especially with Motorolas on Verizon, which I think are rather conservative, and Nokias are especially conservative, but if that's your opinion I'm not going to argue against that.
Andy no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 1:39 AM   #9 (permalink)
Long Term Evolution 4G
 
Mobile Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,743
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T
Thanks: 46
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by azcellphonejunkie
Great report, very infromative. Thanks!

On cingular's behalf, I can tell you that I don't have any issues with them here in Phoenix. I love the service, one of the best, most reliable ones I have used to date...
I think it is just in the area my relatives live since neither Wiggy nor I had a Cingular phone to check signal as we drove around.
__________________
(1994-Present) LG Voyager
at&t (2004-2005, 2006-Present) Nokia 6555 3G

Mobile Mike no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 1:49 AM   #10 (permalink)

 
jimwayda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Posts: 255
Phone(s): Sanyo MM-7400
Provider(s): Sprint
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Andy,

Please understand that I am not trying to dis Verizon. The conclusion that I came to was a result of an experiment with two phones. I have much respect for Verizon as I was with them for over 10 years. (initially Pac Bell, Airtouch, and then Verizon). I was extremely satisfied with their service and would have stayed with them except that I purchased a new home in Laguna Niguel and they could not provide service there. Much to their credit, they sent a technician to check the signal level at my home and determined that it is unusable because they do not have a cell site in the area. As a result, they terminated my contract and I did not have to pay ETF. I was blown-away by the level of service!! Verizon cared enough about one customer to send a technician to check out the problem. No wonder they are rated #1 for customer service/tech support! They are a very professional organization with excellent coverage and service. I highly recommend them reglardless of the bar callibration of the signal meters.

Best Regards,

-jim



Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy84094
Jim,
If it's your opinion that Verizon oferinflates their phones to overstate signals, then that's your opinion and it's fine. I have not experienced that, especially with Motorolas on Verizon, which I think are rather conservative, and Nokias are especially conservative, but if that's your opinion I'm not going to argue against that.
jimwayda no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 1:55 AM   #11 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Campione, Italy
Posts: 10,285
Phone(s): HTC 6900 Touch, Motorola RAZR V3i
Provider(s): VZW, Vodafone D2, Solomo, Swisscom Mobile
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 130
130 Images
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimwayda
Andy,

Please understand that I am not trying to dis Verizon. The conclusion that I came to was a result of an experiment with two phones. I have much respect for Verizon as I was with them for over 10 years. (initially Pac Bell, Airtouch, and then Verizon). I was extremely satisfied with their service and would have stayed with them except that I purchased a new home in Laguna Niguel and they could not provide service there. Much to their credit, they sent a technician to check the signal level at my home and determined that it is unusable because they do not have a cell site in the area. As a result, they terminated my contract and I did not have to pay ETF. I was blown-away by the level of service!! Verizon cared enough about one customer to send a technician to check out the problem. No wonder they are rated #1 for customer service/tech support! They are a very professional organization with excellent coverage and service. I highly recommend them reglardless of the bar callibration of the signal meters.

Best Regards,

-jim
Oh I totally understand and I'm glad that Verizon did at least provide you with great customer service and let you out of your contract for free. I was just a little amazed at your comment about Verizon overstating the signal. You can argue that for some phones for every carrier; I gave a Samsung example for Sprint that would show full bars with -100dBm signal strength...
Bars don't mean a thing Cingular phones here have bars but don't work or are garbled all the time.
Andy no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 2:10 AM   #12 (permalink)
Long Term Evolution 4G
 
Mobile Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,743
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T
Thanks: 46
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy84094
Oh I totally understand and I'm glad that Verizon did at least provide you with great customer service and let you out of your contract for free. I was just a little amazed at your comment about Verizon overstating the signal. You can argue that for some phones for every carrier; I gave a Samsung example for Sprint that would show full bars with -100dBm signal strength...
Bars don't mean a thing Cingular phones here have bars but don't work or are garbled all the time.
True, but the illusion of a strong signal is oh-so appealing( ). Gotta love those signal bars.
Mobile Mike no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 2:13 AM   #13 (permalink)
still knows nothing!!!
 
WiggyFife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 4,318
Phone(s): LG VX8700
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless
Devices: HP Laptop, Palm T|X, iPod, Toyota Camry BT.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbmike212
True, but the illusion of a strong signal is oh-so appealing( ). Gotta love those signal bars.
all this bars-speak!!! I'm feeling _______ic right about now!!! Lead me to your Bars!!!
WiggyFife no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 11:16 AM   #14 (permalink)
Long Term Evolution 4G
 
Mobile Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,743
Phone(s): LG Voyager, Nokia 6555
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless, AT&T
Thanks: 46
Thanked 19 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by WiggyFife
all this bars-speak!!! I'm feeling _______ic right about now!!! Lead me to your Bars!!!
Now, now, Wiggy, don't forget about those "12 steps"...
Mobile Mike no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 12:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
still knows nothing!!!
 
WiggyFife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 4,318
Phone(s): LG VX8700
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless
Devices: HP Laptop, Palm T|X, iPod, Toyota Camry BT.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbmike212
Now, now, Wiggy, don't forget about those "12 steps"...
"Hi!!! I'm the Wiggy... & I'm heavily addicted to Bars!!! I have a serious affliction!!!"
WiggyFife no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 2:22 PM   #16 (permalink)

 
jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by WiggyFife
all this bars-speak!!! I'm feeling _______ic right about now!!! Lead me to your Bars!!!
Singles Bar, Double Bars,
Three way or anything Goes Bar?
__________________
- 3 Billion GSM Users by 2009.
- 700 GSM Carriers in 220 Countries
- 82% of the Global Market
45,000 Cell Sites and Adding.
jones no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 09-30-2005, 10:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
still knows nothing!!!
 
WiggyFife's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 4,318
Phone(s): LG VX8700
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless
Devices: HP Laptop, Palm T|X, iPod, Toyota Camry BT.
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by jones
Singles Bar, Double Bars,
Three way or anything Goes Bar?
yayeah!!! Those all sound good about now!!! So does a Candy Bar too!!!
WiggyFife no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 10-01-2005, 1:54 AM   #18 (permalink)
The Cell Phone Junkie
 
azcellphonejunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cave Creek, AZ
Posts: 2,828
Phone(s): Treo 750, HTC Diamond, BB Pearl, iPhone
Provider(s): ATT|Prior: SPCS, Alltel, T-Mble, Nextel, Verizon
Devices: Acura GPS, iPAQ rx3100, Bluetooth
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by WiggyFife
yayeah!!! Those all sound good about now!!! So does a Candy Bar too!!!
I think we need to get you out more wiggy!
azcellphonejunkie no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 10-02-2005, 2:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
Tomorrow is another day.
 
josephd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA.
Posts: 1,395
Phone(s): 8G iphone 3G, SE W580i, Nokia 2610
Provider(s): AT&T
Devices: 2G ipod shuffle
Thanks: 17
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Images: 1
1 Images
Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by azcellphonejunkie
Great report, very infromative. Thanks!

On cingular's behalf, I can tell you that I don't have any issues with them here in Phoenix. I love the service, one of the best, most reliable ones I have used to date...
That's also due to the fact you have the infamous 6230 Too bad Cingular discontinued it I tried to get one but it had issues with firmware and the phone freezing up, but it was rated tops in RF, I am still trying to purchase one but do not like the cost.
josephd no ha iniciado sesión  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Old 10-02-2005, 3:25 PM   #20 (permalink)
The Cell Phone Junkie
 
azcellphonejunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cave Creek, AZ
Posts: 2,828
Phone(s): Treo 750, HTC Diamond, BB Pearl, iPhone
Provider(s): ATT|Prior: SPCS, Alltel, T-Mble, Nextel, Verizon
Devices: Acura GPS, iPAQ rx3100, Bluetooth
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts


Default Re: Southeast Phoenix Valley Coverage Report