WirelessAdvisor.com

larry · 08-03-2005, 6:16 PM

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005...6_478_2_05.txt

ZaphodB · 08-03-2005, 7:11 PM

ing

heads.

Since their so-precious NIMBY law got struck down, now all of a sudden they need to think about this? I think Sprint is right -- this is retaliation.

larry · 08-03-2005, 8:34 PM

This is war and Sprint has never backed down from anyone. Here's a few notable cases Sprint has won in the past 5 years:

Westminster
Rancho Palos Verdes
Laguna Beach
Del Mar
La Mesa
Berkeley
Malibu
La Canada Flintridge

They've lost:

San Marcos
Rancho Santa Fe

Gman · 08-03-2005, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larry

This is war and Sprint has never backed down from anyone. Here's a few notable cases Sprint has won in the past 5 years:

Westminster
Rancho Palos Verdes
Laguna Beach
Del Mar
La Mesa
Berkeley
Malibu
La Canada Flintridge

They've lost:

San Marcos
Rancho Santa Fe

I'm sure the county's lawyers will advise the county government to tread carefully in this matter or risk further litigation.

CellGeek · 08-05-2005, 1:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larry

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005...6_478_2_05.txt

The same damn NIMBYs probably call customer support wondering why their cell phones drop calls and do not provide good service.

larry · 08-05-2005, 2:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimwayda

The same damn NIMBYs probably call customer support wondering why their cell phones drop calls and do not provide good service.

Of course they do.

BKKloppenborg · 08-08-2005, 4:00 AM

damn i remember when Sprint tired to get a Tower in La Mesa i live here and it was ugly Damn La mesa City councial is a pain in the

belive me i had to deal with them more then once i was happy when Sprint won...

Gman · 08-09-2005, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BKKloppenborg

damn i remember when Sprint tired to get a Tower in La Mesa i live here and it was ugly Damn La mesa City councial is a pain in the

belive me i had to deal with them more then once i was happy when Sprint won...

The interesting thing here now will be watching for site consolidation/optimization with the Nextel locations. I'd imagine there will be alot of permits being applied for but they should be reasonably fast (as far as government permits go) because I think colocations are a shorter process.

G.

larry · 08-09-2005, 1:52 AM

Yes co-locations are often a shorter process but not always. Believe it or not some cities have the same process for co-location as they do for new sites.

cryogenic · 08-09-2005, 6:59 AM

jerks... I totally agree that they're the same idiots that whine to their carrier about bad coverage and dropped calls, yet refuse to allow more towers to be built in their town because they're an "eyesore". I don't consider them to be an eyesore at all. Heck, I love seeing a cell tower since it means that my chances of getting good signal are better. We have towers strewn about the countryside here and nobody complains in the least. It's great.

08-03-2005, 6:16 PM	#1
larry Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30 Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts Images: 156 My Auctions	San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005...6_478_2_05.txt

08-03-2005, 7:11 PM	#2
ZaphodB Signal Go Down De Hole... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Heim of Ana Posts: 3,237 Phone(s): BlackBerry 8830, LG KG800 (GSM Chocolate) Provider(s): Verizon(US) Rogers(CA) Vodafone(ES) 3(HK) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium ing heads. Since their so-precious NIMBY law got struck down, now all of a sudden they need to think about this? I think Sprint is right -- this is retaliation.

08-03-2005, 8:34 PM	Original Poster #3
larry Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30 Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts Images: 156 My Auctions	Re: San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium This is war and Sprint has never backed down from anyone. Here's a few notable cases Sprint has won in the past 5 years: Westminster Rancho Palos Verdes Laguna Beach Del Mar La Mesa Berkeley Malibu La Canada Flintridge They've lost: San Marcos Rancho Santa Fe

08-08-2005, 4:00 AM	#7
BKKloppenborg Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: La Mesa, Ca Posts: 233 Phone(s): LG F9100, LG 8100 (Verizon) Provider(s): Cingular GSM (1 yr), Verizon wireless Devices: 4 GB iPOD mini.. 12" Apple Powerbook(New toy) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts My Auctions	Re: San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium damn i remember when Sprint tired to get a Tower in La Mesa i live here and it was ugly Damn La mesa City councial is a pain in the belive me i had to deal with them more then once i was happy when Sprint won... __________________ Present Providers: Cingular GSM (Nokia 6620), Virgin Mobile... PAST: Verizon wireless (5+ years), AT&T TDMA (2 months quit) Motorola i90 ( Nextel sucks where i live) Soon to return Sprint PCS!!!

08-09-2005, 1:52 AM	Original Poster #9
larry Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,470 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 30 Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts Images: 156 My Auctions	Re: San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium Yes co-locations are often a shorter process but not always. Believe it or not some cities have the same process for co-location as they do for new sites.

WirelessAdvisor.com

Western US Wireless Forum

San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium in U.S. Wireless Forums [Archive]; "http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005...6_478_2_05.txt..."

WirelessAdvisor.com

08-09-2005, 6:59 AM	#10
cryogenic Join Date: May 2002 Location: Knoxville, TN Posts: 1,443 Phone(s): Samsung A990 Provider(s): Verizon Devices: iriver H10 6GB mp3 player Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium jerks... I totally agree that they're the same idiots that whine to their carrier about bad coverage and dropped calls, yet refuse to allow more towers to be built in their town because they're an "eyesore". I don't consider them to be an eyesore at all. Heck, I love seeing a cell tower since it means that my chances of getting good signal are better. We have towers strewn about the countryside here and nobody complains in the least. It's great. __________________ Firefox My blog/pic gallery/etc

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads for: San Diego County Supervisors order cell-tower moratorium
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Los Osos cell phone tower plan goes to county board	larry	Western US Wireless Forum	10	09-20-2005 8:23 PM
Sprint, Cingular sue San Diego county over cell tower rule	larry	Western US Wireless Forum	0	08-02-2003 8:50 PM
Another San Diego County Sprint tower might be shot down in Bonsall	larry	Western US Wireless Forum	3	11-02-2002 11:31 AM
Cell coverage, sales practices under scrutiny - consumers complain about 'dead zones' in San Diego County	larry	Wireless News	9	08-15-2002 6:08 AM
COUNTY'S TOWER MORATORIUM LIKELY TO FALL	Rich	Southern US Wireless Forum	0	03-20-2002 6:15 PM