| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Go Lakers! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,467 Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 29
Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts
Images: 156 |
Friday, July 6, 2007 By JOHN PETRICK STAFF WRITER Cingular Wireless will go to court Monday fighting to erect new cellphone antennas in Wayne to improve user reception – this after the township's Planning Board rejected the company's request to put up the equipment. Cingular, now solely owned by AT&T, applied to the board in December 2004 to install 12 wireless communication antennas atop an office building on property the company leased at 1445 Valley Road, according to the suit. "The property was determined to be a location which would service Cingular's needs in filling a gap which exists in its wireless telecommunications network in the township," the suit states. Following the presentation of testimony, evidence and public hearings in 2005 and 2006, the Planning Board denied Cingular's application on the basis that it did not satisfy conditions in a township ordinance regulating wireless telecommunications facilities, the suit states. Cingular wants state Superior Court Assignment Judge Robert Passero – who will hear the case in Paterson -- to set aside the Planning Board's decision as arbitrary and capricious. It also asks that the court strike down the township's so-called Wireless Ordinance for being so prohibitive to service providers that it violates the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The company argues that it satisfied the terms of the Wireless Ordinance – or, at least, all it could. Attorney Christopher John Stracco, representing Cingular, said that among the many "priorities" outlined in the ordinance is that a company use township land to erect such equipment. "The reasoning seemed to be that the town would get the rental money," he said. Yet, he said, when Wayne recently went out to bid to build a cell tower on municipally owned land, it rejected Cingular's bid in favor of Sprint. The plaintiff maintains that the township's bid requirements were unreasonable. "We believe that they are discriminating against us and are allowing Sprint to build on the township property, while denying us the chance to put a site up nearby. So they are discriminating against one carrier over another and preventing Cingular from serving the public in that area. ... We had a perfectly acceptable landlord willing to put this on a building that's already there. We're looking at an existing building, and we would camouflage the antennae." Calls this week to Wayne officials for comment were not returned. North Jersey Media Group providing local news, sports & classifieds for Northern New Jersey! |
| |
| | #2 |
| Easy,Cheap & Sleazy Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Union County NJ Posts: 8,457 Phone(s): EnV, V750 Provider(s): Verizon Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Images: 293 |
Welcome to NJ and the wonderful world of politics. It is amazing what these towns try to get away with & I hope the judge agrees that they are too restrictive & rules in favor of AT&T. I also hope Sprint gets their tower up & maybe in another location that may be cheaper for them. |
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tool fights wireless, wired worm outbreaks | MOTOhooligan | GENERAL Wireless Discussion | 0 | 11-15-2004 11:24 AM |
| AT&T Wireless also fights NIMBYs | bobolito | Wireless News | 0 | 05-12-2004 10:51 AM |
| Verizon Wireless Fights Effort by Companies to Kill Number Portability | KevinJames | Wireless News | 4 | 08-15-2003 4:32 PM |
| What is a good cellphone provider for Inland Empire? | Shannon | Western US Wireless Forum | 2 | 02-24-2003 11:29 PM |
| Best cellphone provider in tri-city capital district, NY | Northeastern US Wireless Forum | 14 | 05-28-2002 3:09 AM | |