GENERAL Wireless Discussion|Has Verizon Already Taken Over Alltel? in Wireless Topics; "I am very confused. I have no sprint service in ..." | |||||||
| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Connecticut Posts: 179
Phone(s): Blackberry Curve 8330, Previous: Sanyo MM8300, Sanyo MM7400, Samsung SPH-M610 Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I am very confused. I have no sprint service in my house, for the longest time it has always roamed on Alltel 800mhz.. In litchfield country, CT, verizon has always had a 1900mhz pcs license while alltel had the 800. Now, however, i always roam on verizon, alltel is nowhere to be found, and verizon is replacing all of their 1900 equiptment with 800 equiptment. Connecticut keeps all of its information about cell towers and whatnot on a government website. It says for the tower nearest my house, "remove 9 alltel antennas, remove 12 verizon pcs antennas, add 6 verizon pcs antennas and 6 verizon cellular antennas. All of the other areas around me where verizon had antennas also say remove pcs, add cellular antennas. So clearly verizon has somehow gotten the 800 mhz license from alltel? How is this possible when the merger hasnt even gone through yet??? This all just may cause me to switch to verizon someday since if they're putting 800mhz up all over the place now they are going to beat the crap out of sprint as far as coverage goes. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Go Angels! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 13,379
Phone(s): LG Rumor 2, Sanyo Katana II Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 29
Thanked 25 Times in 24 Posts
Images: 154 |
No. The FCC has not made a final determination on the deal and even when they do it will still be a while before the merger becomes final.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| I made my first post! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York Posts: 1
Phone(s): Nokia Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have heard all kinds of news flying around, however it is still not made public. Maybe day after tomorrow there will be some improvement of this issue.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Western MA Posts: 267
Phone(s): AT&T Tilt (8925), Moto V330, Moto E816, Nokia 3590 Provider(s): AT&T, Alltel U Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
Verizon bought the Litchfield County CT market from Alltel, late last year. It was unrelated to the (pending) total Alltel purchase, this year.
|
| | |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mframe For This Useful Post: |
| | #5 |
| Soylent Green is People Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Hilton Head Island, SC Posts: 2,804
Phone(s): HTC Touch Pro Provider(s): Alltel Wireless Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Wirelessly posted (Opera Mini on Alltel HTC 6800: Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.1.11355/786; U; en)) Yes Verizon owns that market now, they usually don't allow roaming on their networks for carriers that have licenses to cover that market. Which is why many smaller carriers oppose the Alltel merger. |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#6 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Connecticut Posts: 179
Phone(s): Blackberry Curve 8330, Previous: Sanyo MM8300, Sanyo MM7400, Samsung SPH-M610 Provider(s): Sprint Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Well, VZW is going to dominate the litchfield hills. Alltel was 800, but they didnt have very many towers. Sprint is 1900, and has a lot of towers all over the place(considering how rural it is) so they always had better coverage than anyone. VZW just started adding pcs here last year, they had almost the same amount of sites as sprint, so coverage was between the two was almost the same, sprint was a lil better. But now vzw is gonna be tops because they're gonna have 800 on a good number of sites. They have already switched most of them out.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hutchinson, KS Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Alltel has a habit of inundating their native areas with towers. I'm not surprised at this.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Midwest Posts: 175
Phone(s): BlackBerry 9630 Provider(s): Verizon Wireless Devices: iMac G5, iPod Touch 2G 16gb, Slacker G2 Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
I am curious to see if and how long it will be before this happens.
__________________ I made the switch from GSM back to CDMA. I am happy with the service, but not the phone selection. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hutchinson, KS Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Probably January. Frankly this waiting game is getting old.
|
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATT vs Alltel/Verizon | cukoz | AT&T Wireless Users | 0 | 12-22-2007 12:02 PM |
| AIM for Verizon & Alltel can now be done via SMS | Fire14 | Wireless News | 5 | 10-27-2007 9:06 PM |
| Alltel Simple freedom? Alltel? VERIZON! | jayc | Southern US Wireless Forum | 13 | 08-03-2003 3:45 PM |
| Alltel vs. Verizon in AZ | Shoo | Western US Wireless Forum | 26 | 09-25-2002 12:18 AM |
| Verizon-Alltel | BarMitch | Southern US Wireless Forum | 25 | 12-31-1969 8:00 PM |