What Is the Magic Number of Wireless Carriers?

[ComicalMoodyDan]

What Is the Magic Number of Wireless Carriers?


By Brian McDonough
Wireless NewsFactor
June 18, 2002

"The elimination of spectrum caps is a very good thing, leaving carriers with more options and room for rolling out high-end, enhanced services," said Frost & Sullivan's K____ij Moghe.



In the next few years, the current six carriers in the U.S. wireless industry most likely will consolidate, and the effect on consumers probably will be small, but positive.

Giga Group senior research fellow Lisa Pierce says it is unlikely the number will dwindle to as few as two, but three is possible. "I'm hoping for four," she told Wireless NewsFactor. "We need three for there to be real competition, and four would kind of keep everything more off-balance."

Off-balance, she says, as in having to work hard to keep consumers happy. "From the customer perspective, four is the minimally acceptable carrier number."

In the coming years, Frost & Sullivan analyst K____ij Moghe agrees, strategic consolidation will be the order of the day, "leaving the market with three to four large national carriers by the 2004 to 2005 timeframe." No way will six survive unchanged, he told Wireless NewsFactor. "This number is twice what the market can support today."



Choosing Sides

A driving force behind the move toward consolidation, Openwave director of technology Kevin Wagner says, is the rollout of next-generation data services, which his company enables for many leading carriers in the United States and abroad. With voice revenues plateauing, carriers need to roll out new services, and that is expensive. Also, there is less time to rest on laurels -- the rate of technological innovation is increasing, he says.

"To get from 2G to 2.5G took 10 years, and we're already looking at 3G in the next few years," he told Wireless NewsFactor. "That's a pretty large capital deployment for someone looking to cover big areas, and the time between writing those big checks is decreasing."

Having five or six carriers all trying to run next-generation networks across the nation is a lot more expensive than having only three or four companies do it.

"I think [consolidation is] inevitable, at some point," Wagner said. "Technology-wise and business-wise, it just makes sense."

Come Together

A strong sign, not of corporate consolidation, but of a recognition that sharing the load is valuable, came in January, when Cingular and AT&T Wireless (NYSE: AWE) partnered to shoulder the burden of deploying GPRS (general packet radio service) networks in the Midwest.

Wagner says it makes sense for companies rolling out networks on the same standards to look at joint deployments or roaming agreements to cut costs.

Pierce says actual consolidation probably will follow technology lines, with GSM/GPRS (global system for mobile communication/GPRS) carriers finding easier and more attractive merging possibilities with each other than with the CDMA-committed (code division multiple access) carriers, and vice versa.

"Sort of like roaming agreements," Pierce says. "They'll learn to make love, not war."

Wide Spectrum

John Lodenius, senior vice president of marketing for CDMA champion Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) , would not predict how much the field is likely to shrink in North America. Echoing Openwave's Wagner, Lodenius said Qualcomm is ready to serve whoever is left -- CDMA or not.

"We're developing chips with both CDMA 1x and GPRS in the same chip. From a technolgy perspective, we can support any combination of carriers," Lodenius told Wireless NewsFactor. "Whatever consolidation the carriers end up in, we'll have solutions."

While fiscal and practical needs may drive the urge to consolidate, the government is providing the ability to do so. By 2003, the FCC will have removed the spectrum caps that have kept carriers from growing too big in certain markets. Without that limitation, it will be easier for carriers to merge into ever-bigger networks, says Frost & Sullivan's Moghe.

"The elimination of spectrum caps is a very good thing, leaving carriers with more options and room for rolling out high-end, enhanced services," he says. "And, yes, the market will lead to consolidation."

What Consolidation?

For consumers, losing a couple of carriers might not make much difference, according to Giga's Pierce. "Right now, the No. 1 factor in picking a carrier is coverage," she explained, "and there's usually not more than three providers with strong coverage in any one market."

So the idea that consumers ever had six carriers to choose from is pretty much an illusion. However, if consolidation saves carriers money and lets them roll out services faster -- and if not, why would they consolidate? -- consumers may benefit from a shrinking field.

Larger, merged companies with bigger subscriber bases will find it more affordable to expand and upgrade networks, resulting in savings they may pass on to their customers. And what is more affordable can often be done more quickly.

Openwave's Wagner agrees, noting that it is not a matter of getting the services on the network, but getting the networks to the people, that is the real challenge. But he makes a cautionary observation: Networks might be rolling out faster than the public is prepared for, already, because next-gen handsets are not available in high quantity and at reasonable prices.

"Traditionally, the network has preceded the handset by a significant amount of time," he noted. Thus, the time advantage of faster rollouts may be lost as masses of consumers wait for more and cheaper phone choices.

Waiting for First Moves

So consolidation is widely expected, but who is going to be bought? Who will merge with whom? That is the part that no one is sure of. Pierce says she has heard rumors of a Cingular-AT&T Wireless alliance, but has seen no sign that the talk is anything more than idle speculation.

"Last fall I predicted that Cingular and Voicestream would merge," Pierce said. Needless to say, that has not happened. "I fail to understand how Voicestream, with its small market share, can continue to provide services."

The other relatively small carrier, Nextel (Nasdaq: NXTL) , also should be headed for change, she said. "They've got a single-digit market share, a business-customer base, and they need to upgrade their technology."

Next-Gen Puzzle

Of course, no carrier has announced anything remotely indicative of buyout or merger plans, and none is likely to, unless and until it is ready to move.

"There is much speculation, and only time will tell what happens," said Andrea Linskey, Verizon's executive director of communications for data services. "From Verizon's perspective, we feel we are well positioned in the industry, and there is no gun to our heads to merge."

It is not an easy game to play -- predicting who will go where, Pierce says, because there are too many factors. Customer acquisition and voice revenues have peaked, churn is at 20 to 30 percent, and data services and next-generation networks are still around the corner. "There are so many pieces to the puzzle."

A lot of pieces, yes. But one thing seems sure: In the next couple of years, there will be fewer of them.



What Is the Magic Number of Wireless Carriers?

[Matt]

<< "Last fall I predicted that Cingular and Voicestream would merge," Pierce said. Needless to say, that has not happened. "I fail to understand how Voicestream, with its small market share, can continue to provide services."
>>



Well, that's because their parent company DT is the 3nd largest mobile carrier in the world (behind Vodafone and China Mobile), and overpaid so they have to make it work. T-Mobile US by September everywhere [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

[ILUVSOCAL]

Here in California, we have 16 different cellular companies. Go to www.mountainwireless.com and click on California for all of them.

[ComicalMoodyDan]

Tennessee spreaded through out the state has at least 14 from what I have counted and there is proabely more then that. Of course there is never that many in one given area. Knoxville has 7 providers from what I heard, and the Tri-Cities TN/VA area has 6 to choose from.

For a smaller state we have a lot of providers to choose from. There are some places in this state where there is as many as 8 providers to choose from in an area.

[ILUVSOCAL]

It depends on the area here as well. Where I live, there are 3 carriers(Edge(AT&T), Verizon, and US Cellular). There are also areas with as few as one carrier(ie.parts of El Dorado County)and areas with as many as 8(LA, Sacramento, SF to name a few) . Until Edge came here last year, we had only the same two carriers(Verizon, who used to be GTE, and before that, Contel Cellular, and US Cellular)that had been here since cell service was first built out in this area. A little sidenote about Edge, they are operating in areas that AT&T did not want to mess with(though they had the licenses to do it)like Ukiah, CA and Pocatello, Idaho. They are 60% privately owned, and 40% owned by AT&T Wireless.