Go Back   WirelessAdvisor.com Forums > Wireless Topics > GENERAL Wireless Discussion

GENERAL Wireless Discussion

|

802.11g, or super g? in Wireless Topics; "Theres a new fad out, better wireless internet connections, I'm ..."




Ad Links
T-Mobile Deals
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2005, 2:10 AM    #1
Fresh Member
 
compumat347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 24
Phone(s): Motorola c650, Motorola T722, Nokia 252c (vintage)
Provider(s): T-mobile To Go
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 802.11g, or super g?

Theres a new fad out, better wireless internet connections, I'm quite satusifes wiht my "wired" dsl connection, and find the wireless solutions too flashy and not as powerful. some companies released some better routers, but how do they increase the speed? it really boils down to your computer, your connection, and how much dough your willing to shell out.
compumat347 has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 10:15 AM    #2
I don't work here.
Shirt Winner! 
 
wgray8231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville, TN (SID 179)
Posts: 1,463
Phone(s): Motorola W755
Provider(s): VZW
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 54
54 Images
Default Re: 802.11g, or super g?

Compare these max speeds:

802.3 (Ethernet): 100 Mbps
802.11b (WiFi): 11 Mbps (Runs in 2.4 GHz range--can interfere with cordless phones)
802.11g: 54 Mbps (Runs in 2.4 GHz range)
802.11a: 54 Mbps (Runns in 5 GHz range--better security, less range)

What kind of speed do you get on DSL? Services range anywhere from .25 to 3 Mbps. What type of network you use in the house won't matter for the Internet connection speed; only within your home network. Ethernet is still going to be the fastest, most reliable, and most secure.
wgray8231 has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 1:54 PM    #3
Iowa Cellular Guru
Mug Winner! 
 
agentHibby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SID 150 or 1214
Posts: 3,472
Phone(s): Nokia 6256i, (retired) Motorola V120c, Timeport 270c, Nokia 252 (Airtouch)
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 802.11g, or super g?

The only difference with super G is if you go peer to peer in your home it will be faster for data transfer. If not G or Super G is fine. Really makes no difference.
__________________
If Verizon can buy out their affiliates they would be better off.
agentHibby has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 3:41 PM    #4

 
Bugwart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 951
Phone(s): Samsung SCH i760,, Samsung M600, SGH-R220,, Moto SLVR L7, many retired
Provider(s): SKT, Verizon, China Mobile, EPlus
Devices: Nuvi 855
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 802.11g, or super g?

Any of the current wireless networks are faster than your broadband connection. I have a 3 mbps cable modem (Charter Pipeline). Either my old notebook with a 802.11b card (11 mbps) or my new notebook with its built in 802.11g (54 mbps) module is much faster than the broadband link. The wireless router can handle up to 100 mbps wired. Anywhere in my house where I sit down with my notebook, the bottleneck is the connection to the internet.

Public wireless access access points are slower than my connection. When I have measured them, there are generally in the range of 300 to 700 kbps.
Bugwart has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 5:25 PM    #5
Chopin's humble servant
Shirt Winner! 
 
Scrumhalf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 1,027
Phone(s): iPhone 3GS 32GB, RAZR V3, V600, V557
Provider(s): AT&T
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: 802.11g, or super g?

Agreed.... I wired my whole house with Ethernet cable in 2000 when it was being built - took about 3 days of solid work. I can usually get anywhere from 40-80 Mbps sustained speed between the 6 computers in my house - probably kinked some of the slower runs.

I'm not sure how fast real life wireless connections work - for example, can g really give sustained 54Mbps performance in ideal circumstances, for examples, between computers in line-of-sight in the same room?

At any rate, it is only a problem if you routinely move movie files between computers.....
__________________
"If I don't practice the way I should, then I won't play the way that I know I can." - Ivan Lendl
Scrumhalf has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2005, 1:09 AM Original Poster Original Poster    #6
Fresh Member
 
compumat347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 24
Phone(s): Motorola c650, Motorola T722, Nokia 252c (vintage)
Provider(s): T-mobile To Go
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 802.11g, or super g?

thats just it, its just a sales pitch, designed and proved in some research facility, which can never be duplicated in a real-life setting
compumat347 has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads for: 802.11g, or super g?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Super 3G coming soon? Fire14 Wireless News 1 02-15-2006 8:32 AM
Super Bowtorola MOTOhooligan GENERAL Wireless Discussion 1 02-04-2005 3:15 PM
Super Small NEC Phone Jrapp Wireless News 14 02-05-2004 11:24 PM
Using my super old GSM phone Jerboy GENERAL Wireless Discussion 1 09-13-2003 12:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:42 AM.