Central US Wireless Forum|Rapid City Carriers? in U.S. Wireless Forums [Archive]; "I'm wondering who actually sells service in Rapid City. I ..." | |||||||
| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member |
I'm wondering who actually sells service in Rapid City. I know that Alltel and Verizon claim native coverage, but the ULS is not particularly helpful in knowing who actually offers service there. AT&T, Sprint, as well as T-Mobile appear to have licenses, but don't offer service there. Surely it can't be a two-horse area, is it? Anyone from RC have any info? Thanks in advance!
|
| |
| | #2 | |
| Celtics have got #17!!!!! Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 591
Phone(s): T-Mobile G1, Motorola KRZR K1, Samsung T339 Provider(s): T-Mobile Hotspot@Home Devices: Zune, Nav-U GPS, Sirius Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Images: 344 | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Original Poster
#3 |
| Junior Member |
Wow, that is really sad. Each area has the potential for nine carriers (not counting AWS). Why can an area with all licenses being licensed only actually have two serving carriers? Irregardless, Alltel would have been my choice by default unless there was a local outfit that could do it better, so I guess I'm safe. Moving there soon, so I wanted to know. Thanks. If anyone has any experience with the two there, I'd be interested. I'm sure Alltel does it best like they usually do when put up against VZW Cellular to Cellular license.
|
| |
| | #4 |
| Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Minnesota Posts: 364
Phone(s): Moto Razr Provider(s): Alltel/Verizon Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
This is not a slam on the Rapid City area, but the other carriers probably don't have plans to build out a network due to lack of revenue potential. AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile are trying to get the most bang for their buck in large metro areas and are spending dollars on 3G upgrades (ie. UMTS, WiMax, etc...). Thats not to say they won't someday install a native network in the area, just right now they irons in the fire elsewhere. These other carriers would rather engage in reasonable roaming agreements with Alltel to get both CDMA & GSM coverage for their customers when they are in that part of the country.
|
| |
| | Original Poster
#5 |
| Junior Member |
What's weirdest about the area is not the lack of national carriers, but rather the lack of any local carrier. Colorado has Union and Viaero, Nebraska has Indigo and Viaero, Iowa has Long Lines, Wyoming has Union, all covering smaller population bases. Apparently the bigger carriers take all the spectrum so that no one local can start, but don't use it. I just don't understand how build out requirements can really be so lax that with 9 licenses in the area, there are only two operating carriers. I could see four or five, but there is something seriously wrong when you end up with two. I really thought the FCC had provisions to stop exactly this from happening. EDIT: But, I do agree with what you're saying. There probably isn't much possibility for growth in that area, and with Alltel providing both CDMA and GSM, there really is no need for the other big three to try. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Minnesota Posts: 364
Phone(s): Moto Razr Provider(s): Alltel/Verizon Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
The FCC is a farce in regards to what they force carriers to provide when they own licenses. I think all AT&T or any other carrier would have to do is stick a transmitting omni antenna on a tower up as its "license saver" for that particular area and call it good.....meeting FCC requirements. You would think these other carriers would be required to eventually build some sort of network out?
|
| |
| | #7 |
| One more post and I'm... Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I too have been disappointed for quite some time about just how poor the options are in Rapid City, considering its population and the amount of tourist traffic the area gets. Qwest wireless had a pretty good buildout (though almost exclusively within the city limits), and I was hoping Sprint would take this when they bought Qwest's network assets, but no luck there. From personal experience, neither VZW nor Alltel are that great in some parts of RC, and especially through much of the Black Hills, though they have both recently improved very slightly. Personally, I'd probably go with Alltel if I lived there. It's a shame, because Viaero could do an excellent job building that area out with usable GSM if they could just pry a license away from somebody. One of the disadvantages of using Viaero, for those living in northern Nebraska, is that the GSM coverage pretty much ends at the South Dakota border as the Alltel roamer GSM coverage, I've heard, is extremely unreliable. |
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low signal causes rapid battery loss? | BrianG | Audiovox / UTStarcom | 4 | 12-06-2004 12:54 PM |
| vx4400 Rapid charger times | mrnyc01 | LG Electronics | 11 | 04-16-2003 11:18 AM |
| vx4400 rapid car chrgr- same as one for LG 510? | jnev | LG Electronics | 1 | 04-14-2003 10:26 AM |
| 3G Rapid Expansion to Continue | Kenster | Wireless News | 1 | 02-16-2003 9:22 PM |
| A500 Desktop Rapid Charger | mkelley | Samsung | 0 | 12-06-2002 9:22 AM |