Results 1 to 9 of 9

Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

I need to know if anyone has any ideas for the SE MN rural areas is Sprint or Verizon is better. ...

  1. #1
    I made my first post!
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    1

    Default Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    I need to know if anyone has any ideas for the SE MN rural areas is Sprint or Verizonicon is better. I need the data plans that either of these companies offer so I really want/need to stay wit one of these two companies. Sprint is really bad about roaming in smaller populated areas. I am curious if anyone who has Verizonicon could give me some information about their signal and if Verizonicon roams down by Wabasha MN or Harmony MN or Spring Grove MN. Any information please let me know.

  2. #2


    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Southern US; Born a Brit!
    Posts
    318
    Phone(s)
    PPC-6700 w/ WM6
    Provider(s)
    Sprint PCS - happily holding crystal clear calls!

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    If you are looking for data Sprint would be your best option. The reason I say this is that they DO NOT cap data (like VZW does). Sprint's unlimited data is truely unlimited - where as Verizon caps theirs at 5KB (right?).

    Also, the thing about Sprint roaming is not true. The reason is that Sprint allows you to force roam on your handset, so if you don't have a good Sprint signal then you can force roam to Verizon - even when in market.

    Verizon does not allow you to force roam. Another thing is that Verizon negs some PRLs therefore this means that even though a roaming provider might be present Verizon says you can't use it - but Sprint lets you use whoever is available.

    I think looking at your needs Sprint would be better - no cap on data, you can force roam, and they don't block roaming either. Also bluetooth is NOT crippled on Sprint (VZW cripples bluetooth). Also Sprint does not have the UI that VZW has.

    And if you like downloading applications Sprint is better beacuse they allow you to download JAVA apps which from 3rd parties are free - there as VZW makes you pay for their more restricted BREW apps.

    Another point I just want to make real fast is that when downloading ringtones VZW takes it and remakes it into a .qcp file which make the sound quality poor. Sprint does not do this - with Sprint you can download .mp3 ringtones, and what not.

    Any questions just ask.
    I am here to soley offer any and all knowledge I may posses. As well as my opinions, which are own opinions and are not to be thought of anything other than a personal opinion. And within my power I will attempt to be as unbiased as possible. Your WA nieghbour, PCSuser.

  3. #3
    UFO
    UFO has left the building.

    UFO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hampton Roads, VA
    Posts
    848
    Phone(s)
    Palm Centro
    LG Rumor
    Moto E815
    Provider(s)
    Sprint and alltel
    Likes
    1

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    I would agree that Verizonicon would probably not be the best choice for you for data. If you compare the data service, Verizonicon caps data, doesn't allow their customers nearly the data roaming capabilites of others, and charges the most for their service. Between Verizonicon and Sprint, I would go with Sprint. However, even with Sprint, you'll be in the rural areas that you mentioned and Sprint may be a hassle. Sprint's PCS signal doesn't do that well in rural areas. There will probably be many areas where, before you switch over to a roaming partner, your phone will have too weak of a signal to use but too strong to switch over, requiring you to manually go in and switch the phone over which is either a hassle to do or something something that you won't think about or fool with many times, and you'll just hang onto a bad Sprint signal. Sprint is probably not the best choice for coverage, but a better overall data choice compared to Verizon.

    But for the areas you mentioned, you really should also look at Alltel. They just took over the Midwest network in Minnesota and the rural areas you mentioned look like they were Midwest strongholds. Nobody else is even close. Overall, I'm about sure they would have the best covered network in Rural Minnesota in the areas you described. Sprint and Verizon both fall back on Alltel/Midwest in some of those rural areas, but if you're with Alltel, you won't have to go through several miles of poor/bad signal before switching over. You also won't have to worry about any problems that some people sometimes experience trying to roam on a data network. For the best quality service, it's usually best to be a customer of the company who's signal you're actually using. For data plans for smartphones, Alltel also now has the Smart Choice Packs which are competitively priced, where you get unlimited data on your line and nights at 7, unlimited texting, and My Circle on all lines on your account. I really think when it comes to the best service, from Rochester through SE MN, Alltel would be the natural choice and very hard to beat for quality of service and they have some good data plans also.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    145
    Phone(s)
    AT&T i phone
    VZW Moto-Q
    Provider(s)
    AT&T, VZW
    Likes
    1

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    I have friends with Sprint. As of the last 1-2 years, the quality seems quite good in MN. Yes, they love the unlimited data and force roaming option. I have used VZW on two seperate occasions and have been displeased with the way they govern the phones to not being able to use available cell systems in poor quality areas. Also, VZW may be more $$. The best luck I have experienced has been Alltel, but watching others with Sprint in these areas has been a pleasant surprise. Good Luck. Try to personally speak with many people that use different cell companies in the specific areas you are questioning. And let us know your results, if you can.

  5. #5

    Dogma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    364
    Phone(s)
    Moto Razr
    Provider(s)
    Alltel/Verizon
    Likes
    1

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    Quote Originally Posted by kerryrey View Post
    Sprint is really bad about roaming in smaller populated areas. I am curious if anyone who has Verizonicon could give me some information about their signal and if Verizonicon roams down by Wabasha MN or Harmony MN or Spring Grove MN. Any information please let me know.
    I am not sure how Alltel's data plans rate against the other two mentioned providers. But on shear coverage alone in these few rural areas you specify, I can tell you right now Alltel will have the superior coverage. These small towns you listed are in historic Midwest Wireless markets, which are now under the Alltel flag due to the purchase. Anyone who tells you Sprint or Verizonicon is just as good in the more rural areas is plain wrong in that aspect. I know that the Midwest Wireless stores in Rochester are being transformed into Alltel stores as we speak....sounds like they will be done end of July sometime. You may want to research Alltel's data plans to see if they are comparable to the others. Even if the Alltel plan turns out to be a little less economical, you may want to pay the difference in order to have the radio waves to use your PDA/phone! Just my two cents.

  6. #6


    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Southern US; Born a Brit!
    Posts
    318
    Phone(s)
    PPC-6700 w/ WM6
    Provider(s)
    Sprint PCS - happily holding crystal clear calls!

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogma View Post
    I am not sure how Alltel's data plans rate against the other two mentioned providers. But on shear coverage alone in these few rural areas you specify, I can tell you right now Alltel will have the superior coverage. These small towns you listed are in historic Midwest Wireless markets, which are now under the Alltel flag due to the purchase. Anyone who tells you Sprinticon or Verizonicon is just as good in the more rural areas is plain wrong in that aspect. I know that the Midwest Wireless stores in Rochester are being transformed into Alltel stores as we speak....sounds like they will be done end of July sometime. You may want to research Alltel's data plans to see if they are comparable to the others. Even if the Alltel plan turns out to be a little less economical, you may want to pay the difference in order to have the radio waves to use your PDA/phone! Just my two cents.
    Well, while Alltel is the king in rural coverage, they don't beat Sprinticon's data prices. Therefore, I would suggest signing up with Sprinticon - and this way you get Sprint's pricing, but you can free/unlimited roam on Alltel's EvDo network.

    That is what I would suggest. And no one bring up the 'ToS says no excessive off-network roaming'. Well Sprint has yet, to date kick anyone off even for 100% roaming...

    So yes, I would go with Sprint.
    I am here to soley offer any and all knowledge I may posses. As well as my opinions, which are own opinions and are not to be thought of anything other than a personal opinion. And within my power I will attempt to be as unbiased as possible. Your WA nieghbour, PCSuser.

  7. #7
    Gearhead/Gadget freak Buickman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Bye Bye MN, Hello Cali
    Posts
    902
    Phone(s)
    BB 9550, Moto Droid
    Retired: BB Curve, LG9100
    Moto Z6tv, E815,V710
    Nokia 3285, Nokia 6185
    Provider(s)
    Verizon on both phones
    Likes
    9
    Images
    1

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    Quote Originally Posted by kerryrey View Post
    I am curious if anyone who has Verizonicon could give me some information about their signal and if Verizonicon roams down by Wabasha MN or Harmony MN or Spring Grove MN.

    It wouldn't make any difference if you went with Sprint or VZW, because they both will be roaming on Alltel (the old Midwest Wireless system) in that area. Like Dogma said, I would just go right to the source for your service. I never get that far south, but in the past I've found the Midwest Wireless system to be very good in southern MN.
    Cars became my job, so phones became my hobby. Car's are not my job anymore, but phones are still a fun hobby.

  8. #8

    Dogma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    364
    Phone(s)
    Moto Razr
    Provider(s)
    Alltel/Verizon
    Likes
    1

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    Quote Originally Posted by PCSuser View Post
    Well, while Alltel is the king in rural coverage, they don't beat Sprinticon's data prices. Therefore, I would suggest signing up with Sprinticon - and this way you get Sprinticon's pricing, but you can free/unlimited roam on Alltel's EvDo network.
    If Sprints data package is more than a few dollars on the better side of the deal it may be worth going with them. But if its only a couple bucks, you may be better off with Alltel...as you will never have to roam or experience the inherent problems that can come with roaming when both providers offer service in the same market. For instance, your phone with Sprint could pull a weak signal from a Sprint cell tower (and drop data packets over EVDO) when an Alltel tower closer with better signal maybe near by for you to roam on. This can also cause issues with voice as your mobile may monitor a weak paging channel from your native provider and cause poor call quality (low signal) when the #1 roamer on the PRL has a better serving tower nearby. That is just the nature of the beast when competitors serve in the same markets and at the same time are also roaming partners.

    On the other hand if you had Alltel and went to Minneapolis for business, you would most certainly roam on Sprint due to the fact Alltel doesn't have the license for serving that market, hence no performance problems.

    Are these roaming issues rampant network wide, no. But they are known to occur.

  9. #9
    Easy,Cheap & Sleazy Fire14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Union County NJ
    Posts
    8,456
    Phone(s)
    EnV
    V750
    Provider(s)
    Verizon
    Likes
    1
    Images
    293

    Default Re: Sprint Vs. Verizon SE MN

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogma View Post
    If Sprints data package is more than a few dollars on the better side of the deal it may be worth going with them. But if its only a couple bucks, you may be better off with Alltel...as you will never have to roam or experience the inherent problems that can come with roaming when both providers offer service in the same market. For instance, your phone with Sprinticon could pull a weak signal from a Sprinticon cell tower (and drop data packets over EVDO) when an Alltel tower closer with better signal maybe near by for you to roam on. This can also cause issues with voice as your mobile may monitor a weak paging channel from your native provider and cause poor call quality (low signal) when the #1 roamer on the PRL has a better serving tower nearby. That is just the nature of the beast when competitors serve in the same markets and at the same time are also roaming partners.

    On the other hand if you had Alltel and went to Minneapolis for business, you would most certainly roam on Sprinticon due to the fact Alltel doesn't have the license for serving that market, hence no performance problems.

    Are these roaming issues rampant network wide, no. But they are known to occur.

    I also agree, you do not hear very many people complain about Alltel on service & CS as well as coverage. At least with them you would not have to worry about roaming or force roaming your phone in bordeline areas.

    Plus they have some good plans from my understanding, I know if they were available here in NJ, I would choose them from everything I hear about them & how well my parents talk about their coverage. (The only place I heard of coverage problems was in the Williamsburg VA area)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-19-2008, 11:42 PM
  2. Verizon or Sprint?
    By Valli59 in forum Northeastern US Wireless Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 07-08-2003, 12:39 AM
  3. Sprint vs. Verizon
    By SSB in forum Southern US Wireless Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-26-2002, 11:26 AM
  4. Sprint vs. Verizon
    By BigBroni in forum Western US Wireless Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-21-2002, 4:06 PM
  5. Best Sprint Phones? ATT vs Sprint vs Verizon
    By JimC in forum Southern US Wireless Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-31-1969, 7:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Us | Advertising | Privacy Statement | Legal | Press | Feedback/Contact


Forum feeds:         Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Copyright 1997-2013 Wireless Advisor, LLC. All rights reserved. All registered and unregistered trademarks are the property of their respective holders.
WirelessAdvisor.com is not associated by ownership or membership with any cellular, PCS or wireless service provider companies and is not meant to be an endorsement of any company or service. Some links on these pages may be paid advertising or paid affiliate programs.


Copyscape Protected  WAP Site for WirelessAdvisor.com  Visit the WirelessAdvisor page on facebook.com