Go Back   WirelessAdvisor.com Forums > Wireless Topics > Cell Tower Hunting Club

Cell Tower Hunting Club

|

Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line in Wireless Topics; "While you guys are out hunting towers, do you notice ..."




Ad Links
T-Mobile Deals
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2007, 9:24 AM    #1
Telecom Evangelist
Raffle Contest Winner! Shirt Winner! 
 
RadioRaiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Undisclosed
Posts: 1,360
Provider(s): GSM / WCDMA
Thanks: 36
Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts
Default Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

While you guys are out hunting towers, do you notice what % of sites use microwave radio for tansmission? (They would be small microwave dishes usually around 3-10 feet in diameter and pointing horizontally at another tower)

I was on the East Coast last year (between New York and Boston) and don't recall seing any microwave dishes on any cell towers.

I assume most operators used fixed-lines for their transport network then? Usually, microwave is cheaper, as it pays itself off in only a few years, compared to the recurring monthly costs of leased-lines. (However, if you are say ATT and own both the mobile AND fixed line networks, then maybe it's not much of an issue?)

Are there certain operators in the USA that prefer to use them, and other not? And what are their reasons?
RadioRaiders has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 5:17 PM    #2

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 713
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Signal Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

Quote:
Originally Posted by esto View Post
While you guys are out hunting towers, do you notice what % of sites use microwave radio for tansmission? (They would be small microwave dishes usually around 3-10 feet in diameter and pointing horizontally at another tower)

I was on the East Coast last year (between New York and Boston) and don't recall seing any microwave dishes on any cell towers.

I assume most operators used fixed-lines for their transport network then? Usually, microwave is cheaper, as it pays itself off in only a few years, compared to the recurring monthly costs of leased-lines. (However, if you are say ATT and own both the mobile AND fixed line networks, then maybe it's not much of an issue?)

Are there certain operators in the USA that prefer to use them, and other not? And what are their reasons?
One reason you don't see microwave used as the backhaul is the additional cost for tower space (can be more per month than a T-1). In the US carriers rent tower space from tower companies.
hillbilly44 has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 5:40 PM Original Poster Original Poster    #3
Telecom Evangelist
Raffle Contest Winner! Shirt Winner! 
 
RadioRaiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Undisclosed
Posts: 1,360
Provider(s): GSM / WCDMA
Thanks: 36
Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillbilly44 View Post
In the US carriers rent tower space from tower companies.
Is that true in all cases, or just some? I'd think the operator would want to build some of their own sites and not be totally dependant on coverage based on where a "tower company" decides to put their sites.
RadioRaiders has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 9:02 PM    #4

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Images: 245
245 Images
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

Quote:
Originally Posted by esto View Post
Is that true in all cases, or just some? I'd think the operator would want to build some of their own sites and not be totally dependant on coverage based on where a "tower company" decides to put their sites.
Often the carriers have operating agreements with tower companies. The carrier decides where the new site is needed and it does all the leasing, permitting and engineering for the tower. Then they sell the site to the tower company and become a tenant on the structure. It works out well for both parties because the tower company gets a tower with at least one tenant from the get-go, and the carrier gets the site where they want it while not having to tie up a bunch of capital in the structure.
chuikov has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2007, 11:14 PM    #5
Powered by HTC FUZE
Shirt Winner! 
 
RadioFoneGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Everywhere.
Posts: 1,263
Phone(s): Nokia 6103, 6010, 2260, HTC FUZE, HTC TILT, Nokia 6682, 6085, to many phones
Provider(s): The death star formally known as Cell One.
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 6
6 Images
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

It used to be cheaper to run a Microwave network, but not so much anymore. There are two primary unlicence freqs a carrier can use for a micro hop and they are 2.4 and 5.8. We have quite alot of both. Some of the companies we bought used microwave as the primary backhaul for both T-1 and DS3. Running a DS3 on unlicence 2.4 is a serious no no. Wi-Fi uses 2.4 and some of our microwave takes interference because of this.
RadioFoneGuy has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2007, 11:27 PM    #6
Bad Handoff Investigator
 
TelcomJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The 4145
Posts: 1,322
Provider(s): Big Brother
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Images: 149
149 Images
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

In our area microwave antennas are much harder to get approved by the city when T1's are a viable option. Less visual blight. That said, Verizon Wireless has quite an impressive microwave network in the Los Angeles area but most of it was built out in the mid-late 90's and even early 00's but the approval process was much easier than it's become recently.
__________________
-tj
TelcomJunkie has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 11:16 PM    #7
Powered by HTC FUZE
Shirt Winner! 
 
RadioFoneGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Everywhere.
Posts: 1,263
Phone(s): Nokia 6103, 6010, 2260, HTC FUZE, HTC TILT, Nokia 6682, 6085, to many phones
Provider(s): The death star formally known as Cell One.
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 6
6 Images
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

Verizon Wireless had a great commodity Verizon Business which has a great backhaul structure. Most of that micro was probably part of GTE's back haul and my have already been in place.

We dont do much new micro unless we cant get a T-1 to a tower.
RadioFoneGuy has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 11:32 PM    #8
Bad Handoff Investigator
 
TelcomJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The 4145
Posts: 1,322
Provider(s): Big Brother
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Images: 149
149 Images
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cellonetech View Post
Verizon Wireless had a great commodity Verizon Business which has a great backhaul structure. Most of that micro was probably part of GTE's back haul and my have already been in place.

We dont do much new micro unless we cant get a T-1 to a tower.
Well the Verizon Wireless network here was originally owned by PacTel Cellular (Run by Pacific Telesis). Which was then sold off to GTE/Airtouch.... (Not much later Pacific Telesis decided to try again and launched their GSM network which is became the ATT Orange Network) and GTE/Airtouch became Verizon Wireless around 1999.

The infrastructure that they're using is completely seperate than the Vz Business microwave, which is almost non-existent in this area.
__________________
-tj
TelcomJunkie has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2007, 3:38 AM    #9
Telecom Atty/RF Engr.
Mug Winner! Shirt Winner! 
 
Jonathan Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 631
Phone(s): Crackberry Curve, 2500, Earphones, Tin-cans-and-string
Provider(s): Verizon Wireless (as of 8/13/08)
Devices: BVSystems Drive Test Receiver
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Images: 265
265 Images


Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

Quote:
Originally Posted by TelcomJunkie View Post
In our area microwave antennas are much harder to get approved by the city when T1's are a viable option. Less visual blight. That said, Verizon Wireless has quite an impressive microwave network in the Los Angeles area but most of it was built out in the mid-late 90's and even early 00's but the approval process was much easier than it's become recently.
TJ is, as usual, correct. Microwave backhaul is a tough sell in the SoCal market where T1s are plentiful (and advisors like me know it).

jlk
__________________
Jonathan L. Kramer, Esq., BTS, BDS, BPS, CBT
1,000+ Wireless Site Photos & Blog: CellularPCS.com
Kramer Telecom Law Firm, PC: TelecomLawFirm.com
Jonathan Kramer has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 11:06 AM    #10
Powered by HTC FUZE
Shirt Winner! 
 
RadioFoneGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Everywhere.
Posts: 1,263
Phone(s): Nokia 6103, 6010, 2260, HTC FUZE, HTC TILT, Nokia 6682, 6085, to many phones
Provider(s): The death star formally known as Cell One.
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Images: 6
6 Images
Default Re: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line

I bet. SoCal was probably on the forefront of the Fiber revolution back in the day.

Speaking of Micro, I have to put in a new micro shot in the next month to a new site. The site in question is a raw land build that is in a bird sanctuary and a swampy area. The DNR is looking to make sure the tower wont interfere with the warbler. It would be a pain to get Telco out there so Micro it is.
RadioFoneGuy has left the building.  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads for: Tansmission: microwave or fixed-line
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird Microwave Tower nKrypteD1 Cell Tower Hunting Club 37 03-01-2007 6:05 PM
Microwave Antenna Question... marklar Cell Tower Hunting Club 17 09-30-2006 3:17 PM
Microwave Moto? MOTOhooligan GENERAL Wireless Discussion 30 09-30-2006 3:10 PM
microwave dishes?? Rollindown95 GENERAL Wireless Discussion 3 07-06-2006 10:57 PM
Cell Site or just Microwave antenna? 714tmobile Cell Tower Hunting Club 5 04-08-2006 3:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 AM.