AT&T Wireless Users|International billing error in Wireless Carrier Users Forums; "Can anyone advise me what to do in the following ..." | |||||||
| Forums | Active Topics | [Click to Join Our Forums] | Cell Tower Pictures | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| I have a weird title! Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Can anyone advise me what to do in the following situation? I am being charged $100 for a call from Quito, Ecuador, back to the US. AT&T claims that the call lasted 50 minutes; I know it was no more than a few minutes. I made about 15 calls during the same trip varying in length between 1 and 6 minutes, with an average duration of 2 minutes. AT&T refuses to take me (and my mother in law who received the call) at my word that there is no way I would have talked that long; they flatly deny that there could have been a malfunction (e.g., in the switching equipment) that led to this error. They've offered to reduce the cost by half, but I refused. Any advice will be most welcome. |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#2 |
| I have a weird title! Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Can anyone advise me what to do in the following situation? I am being charged $100 for a call from Quito, Ecuador, back to the US. AT&T claims that the call lasted 50 minutes; I know it was no more than a few minutes. I made about 15 calls during the same trip varying in length between 1 and 6 minutes, with an average duration of 2 minutes. AT&T refuses to take me (and my mother in law who received the call) at my word that there is no way I would have talked that long; they flatly deny that there could have been a malfunction (e.g., in the switching equipment) that led to this error. They've offered to reduce the cost by half, but I refused. Any advice will be most welcome. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: in my own house Posts: 1,404
Phone(s): crackberry's Devices: my home wi-fi router and laptop Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Images: 49 |
i suggest you pay your bill. you realize that even if your on the phone for 1second that is 1minute right? or for instance, 2mins and 10 seconds is still 3 mins. the billing that occured is probably valid and you should just pay it and not stress. using your phone internationally you knew it would cost you, so why fight it?
|
| | |
| | Original Poster
#4 |
| I have a weird title! Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Why fight it? Well, for one thing because we're not talking about rounding up to the next minute, and $100 is not the same as $2 (the cost of one extra minute). More importantly, if you multiply this by the number of people making international calls, and even if only 1 in 10,000 calls has an error, you're talking about $millions. And there is no way to check! |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Luv My Treo !!!!! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: SE Wisconsin Posts: 6,235
Phone(s): Treo Pro, Nokia 6131, Moto i325 IS Provider(s): at&t/at&t/Nextel Devices: Assorted handheld & installed GPS Thanks: 67
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
Images: 168 | Quote:
I have some questions: 1. Do all the other calls show the right duration? 2. What does OLAM show for duration? 3. Does either your phone or you MIL's phone's call log show details of calls made from Equador and their duration? If they do, since these cannot be altered manually, you may have some ammunation to fight this.
__________________ The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made. Jean Giraudoux (1882-1944) | |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#6 |
| I have a weird title! Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Excellent points! 1. Yes, as far as I can tell all other calls were billed correctly 2. Sorry, I'm a newbie. How do I check OLAM for duration? 3. That would be great, but both phones only retain the last 20 calls, and this call took place on January 1 '08; I didn't find out until I checked the bill, last week. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Luv My Treo !!!!! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: SE Wisconsin Posts: 6,235
Phone(s): Treo Pro, Nokia 6131, Moto i325 IS Provider(s): at&t/at&t/Nextel Devices: Assorted handheld & installed GPS Thanks: 67
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
Images: 168 | Quote:
OLAM=On Line Account Management. I am presuming you are not signed up for it but you can now and it will hopefully show your prior calls. Here is the link for you to sign up for it or sign in if you already are. Unfortunately, the chances are OLAM will also show the call as 50 mins since that is what the system logged it in as. PS: I am not sure if at&t can do much more than give you a discount at this pont, since they are getting their information from whoever you were roaming with in Equador.
__________________ The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made. Jean Giraudoux (1882-1944) | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| coverage is king Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Herndon, VA Posts: 1,102
Phone(s): The latest and greatest. Provider(s): All of them. Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Images: 4 | Quote:
Using cellular systems abroad, especially in the developing world, can often prove to be a major pain. Charges can be erratic and inaccurate. (At least this is what my personal experiences have led me to believe, others may not agree with me on that). I know you aren't going to like me saying this, but I would take AT&T's offer and just pay the rest. It might not be worth all of your time to try and fight this. My recommendation is to try calling back and see if they'll shave off a little more money. This is why, if I have the opportunity to do so, I use prepaid cellular systems abroad. That way I know I'm less likely to see surprises. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: in my own house Posts: 1,404
Phone(s): crackberry's Devices: my home wi-fi router and laptop Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Images: 49 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Telecom Evangelist Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Undisclosed Posts: 1,360
Provider(s): GSM / WCDMA Thanks: 36
Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts
| Quote:
One other thought: is it possible you thought you hung the phone up but didn't, and the call really did stay active that long? Just a thought...
__________________ Understand communications. Visit Radio Raiders Plot your own cellular coverage maps at Cellumap | |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#11 | |
| I have a weird title! Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
MIL's phone is also AT&T, and it shows a 51 minute call (go figure how the receving call could be longer than the originating one, which takes extra airtime to dial and establish the connection). It's possible that one party didn't press the off button correctly when we ended the call, but AT&T confirms that this would not be enough to maintain the connection. Both phones had to be on to get a valid call duration. I know this doesn't look strong, but both MIL and I are pretty ____ about hanging up the phone properly, and we never talk for more than a few minutes. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Telecom Evangelist Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Undisclosed Posts: 1,360
Provider(s): GSM / WCDMA Thanks: 36
Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts
| Then ATT should be able to check their call records to verify that it wasn't an error from the Ecuador operator. However, given that the call is over 40 days old, they may just have a "too bad, too late" attitude since ATT probably has to pay the Ecuador operaotor anyway. I'd take Wumps advice and pay (half) the bill, chalk it up as a loss, and get a pre-paid next time.
__________________ Understand communications. Visit Radio Raiders Plot your own cellular coverage maps at Cellumap |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Luv My Treo !!!!! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: SE Wisconsin Posts: 6,235
Phone(s): Treo Pro, Nokia 6131, Moto i325 IS Provider(s): at&t/at&t/Nextel Devices: Assorted handheld & installed GPS Thanks: 67
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
Images: 168 | The one problem I have with a pre-paid local SIM is that unless I carry two phones or keep switching SIMS to make phone calls, anyone calling me from the US in an emergency or otherwise, incurs long distance charges.
__________________ The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made. Jean Giraudoux (1882-1944) |
| | |
| | Original Poster
#14 |
| I have a weird title! Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Again, thanks for the good comments. I'll wait to hear back from the BBB before deciding whether to take the 50% offer. And I'll probably carry a separate phone (with local SIM) for outgoing calls from now on. That will still keep me within reach for calls from the US. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Fresh Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Chicago Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Since, the other phone showed 51 mins, and If it's showing 50 mins on your January bill or OLAM there is a good chance both phones forgot to hang up. If I were you, I would go ahead and take the AT&T offer and consider this "lesson learnt". It's best not to roam at all if you can, if you are going to be making more than a couple of calls. I always take more than 1 phone with me. I will have my AT&T phone alread forwarded unconditionally to an international sim(Directly or inderectly via a 3rd party such as voicestick), and then leave my AT&T sim in my phone, and the international sim in another phone. That way I will not be charged for any roaming calls, except if I make out going calls from my AT&T phone. And I can still receive my texts and use the AT&T phone to check email briefly if I need to.
|
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Telecom Evangelist Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Undisclosed Posts: 1,360
Provider(s): GSM / WCDMA Thanks: 36
Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts
| Quote:
Or sometimes the clearinghouse (the intermediary) has a mistake in the billing file. There can be alot of things that can go wrong. But operators may not bother to investigate if the error is only $100 (ok, it's alot to YOU, but they have bigger fish to fry). Maybe for "small" errors of $100 they just automatically offer to split the bill instead of investigating, which takes their time and resources. PS- If you really want to know the billing process for roaming, here's a good read: GSM World - Using GSM - Tapping the Potential of Roaming
__________________ Understand communications. Visit Radio Raiders Plot your own cellular coverage maps at Cellumap | |
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discovered major Suncom billing error - check your bill | ninjafly | Southern US Wireless Forum | 1 | 12-08-2007 4:10 PM |
| XV6700 connecting to laptop for internet access: Error codes 37 and RAS Error 720 | eljainc | Audiovox / UTStarcom | 0 | 06-01-2006 8:53 PM |
| Vtext International SMS map error | Andy | Verizon Wireless Users | 0 | 03-17-2005 1:27 PM |
| Help with ATT Billing!! | vrundmc | Northeastern US Wireless Forum | 11 | 12-31-2003 8:54 PM |
| Billing Error/Dispute w/T-Mobile falling on Deaf/Rude&Poorly trained staff of imbeciles!!! | Marti | Western US Wireless Forum | 7 | 02-07-2003 9:06 AM |